EGFR and VEGFR-2 represent promising targets for cancer treatment as they are very important in tumor development as well as in angiogenesis and metastasis. In this work, 6-amino-4-(2-bromophenyl)-3-methyl-1,4-dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole-5-carbonitrile 1 and (E)-4-(2-Bromobenzylidene)-5-methyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-pyrazol-3-one 11 were selected as starting materials to synthesize different fused pyrazole derivatives; dihydropyrano[2,3-c]pyrazole 1, 2, 7-9, and 15, pyrazolo[4 ′ ,3 ′ :5,6]pyrano[2,3d]pyrimidine 3-6, pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine 12 and 13, and pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyrazole 14 derivatives were synthesized to evaluate their anticancer activity against HEPG2 human cancer cell lines compared to erlotinib and sorafenib as reference drugs. Seven compounds 1, 2, 4, 8, 11, 12, and 15 showed nearly 10 fold higher activity than erlotinib (10.6 µM) with IC 50 ranging from 0.31 to 0.71 µM. In vitro EGFR and VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity were performed for the synthesized compounds, and the results identified compound 3 as the most potent EGFR inhibitor (IC 50 = 0.06 µM) and compound 9 as the most potent VEGFR-2 inhibitor (IC 50 = 0.22 µM). Moreover, compounds 9 and 12 revealed potent dual EGFR and VEGFR-2 inhibition, and these results were supported by docking studies of these two compounds within the active sites of both enzymes.

No abstract

No abstract

Novel pyridine‐derived compounds (5–19) were designed and synthesized, and their anticancer activities were evaluated against HepG2 and MCF‐7 cells, targeting the VEGFR‐2 enzyme. Compounds 10, 9, 8, and 15 were found to be the most potent derivatives against the two cancer cell lines, HepG2 and MCF‐7, respectively, with IC50 = 4.25 and 6.08 µM, 4.68 and 11.06 µM, 4.34 and 10.29 µM, and 6.37 and 12.83 µM. Compound 10 displayed higher activity against HepG2 cells than sorafenib (IC50 = 9.18 and 5.47 µM, respectively) and doxorubicin (IC50 = 7.94 and 8.07 µM, respectively). It also showed higher activity than doxorubicin against MCF‐7 cells, but lower activity than sorafenib. Compounds 9, 8, and 15 displayed higher activities than sorafenib and doxorubicin against HepG2 cells but exhibited lower activities against MCF‐7 cells. Compound 10 potently inhibited VEGFR‐2 at an IC50 value of 0.12 µM, which is nearly equipotent to sorafenib (IC50 = 0.10 µM). Compounds 8 and 9 exhibited very good activity with the same IC50 value of 0.13 µM. The six most potent derivatives, 6, 9, 8, 10, 15, and 18, were tested for their cytotoxicity against normal Vero cells. Compounds 6, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 18 are, respectively, 1.13, 3.74, 4.18, 3.64, 2.81, and 2.00 times more toxic to HepG2 and 2.06, 1.58, 1.76, 2.54, 1.40, and 2.69 times more toxic to MCF‐7 breast cancer cells than in normal Vero cells.

No abstract

Newly designed thiazolidine-2,4-diones 3–7a–c were synthesized, and their anticancer activities were screened against three cancer lines. They showed potent activities against HepG2 compared to the other HCT116 and MCF-7 tumor cell lines. Compounds 7c and 6c were detected as highly effective derivatives against MCF-7 (IC50 = 7.78 and 8.15 µM), HCT116 (IC50 = 5.77 and 7.11 µM) and HepG2 (IC50 = 8.82 and 8.99 µM). The highly effective derivatives 6a–c and 7a–c were tested against VERO normal cell lines. All derivatives were evaluated for their VEGFR-2 inhibitory actions and demonstrated high to low activities, with IC50 values varying from 0.08 to 0.93 µM. Moreover, derivatives 5a–c, 6a–c and 7a–c were assessed to verify their in vitro binding affinities to PPARγ and insulin-secreting activities. Finally, docking studies were performed to explore their affinities and binding modes toward both VEGFR-2 and PPARγ receptors.

Novel heterocyclic derivatives (4–22) were designed, synthesized, and evaluated against hepatocellular carcinoma type (HepG2) and breast cancer (MCF‐7) cells, targeting the VEGFR‐2 enzyme. Compounds 18, 10, 13, 11, and 14 were found to be the most potent derivatives against both the HepG2 and MCF‐7 cancer cell lines, with GI50 = 2.11, 2.54 µM, 3.16, 3.64 µM, 3.24, 6.99 µM, 7.41, 6.49 µM and 8.08, 10.46 µM, respectively. Compounds 18 and 10 showed higher activities against both HepG2 and MCF‐7 cells than sorafenib (GI50 = 9.18, 5.47 µM, respectively) and doxorubicin (GI50 = 7.94, 8.07 µM, respectively). Compounds 13, 11, and 14 showed higher activities than sorafenib against HepG2 cancer cells, but lower activities against MCF‐7 cells. Compounds 18, 13, and 10 were more potent than sorafenib, inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐2 (VEGFR‐2) at GI50 values of 0.05, 0.06, and 0.08 µM, respectively. Compound 11 inhibited VEGFR‐2 at an IC50 value of 0.10 µM, which is equipotent to sorafenib. Compound 14 inhibited VEGFR‐2 at an IC50 value of 0.11 µM, which is nearly equipotent to sorafenib. The tested compounds have more selectivity against cancer cell lines. Compounds 18, 10, 13, 11, and 14 are, respectively, 16.76, 9.24, 6.06, 2.78, and 2.85 times more toxic in HePpG2 cancer cells than in VERO normal cells. Also, compounds 18, 10, 13, 11, and 14 are, respectively, 14.07, 8.02, 2.81, 3.18, and 2.20 times more toxic in MCF‐7 than in VERO normal cells. The most active compounds, 10, 13, and 18, showed a good ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) profile.

Herein, the biological activities including antibacterial, antifungal, and in-vitro cytotoxicity for some novel substituted pyrazolo [3,4-d]pyrimidinone, benzylidene dihydropyrimidine, pyrano [2,3-d]pyrimidine, hexahydropyrimido[4, 5-d]pyrimidinone, tetrahydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carbonitrile, and pyrido[2, 3-d:6,5-d'] dipyrimidinone derivatives were investigated. The synthesized novel compounds were achieved through the incorporation of the active moieties such as halo compound, pyrazolo, pyrano, pyrimido, pyrido-derivatives with active methylene group in thiobarbituric acid derivatives at C-5. Structures of all synthesized compounds were characterized by spectral techniques including IR, 1 H-NMR, MS, and 13 C-NMR. All synthesized compounds were screened for their antibacterial and antifungal activity, while the most promising compounds were selected to investigate their in-vitro cytotoxic efficacy against normal Vero cells and cancerous Caco-2 cells. Data showed that the biological activities were concentration-dependent. All novel pyrimidine derivatives exhibited broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity with a varied zone of inhibition ranging between 11.3 ± 0.6 and 25.3 ± 0.6 mm. The MIC values are different according to a pathogenic organism (ranging between 3.91 and 500 µg mL −1 ), whereas the MBC/ MFC were 2 × to 4 × MIC value. Data of in-vitro cytotoxicity confirm the efficiency of selected novel pyrimidine derivatives to target Caco-2 cancerous cells at low concentrations more Vero normal cells. Four selected compounds 4, 7b, 10, and