The use of IVIG plus corticosteroids is cost saving compared with treatment with immunosuppressant plus corticosteroids in Thai patients with steroid-refractory DM. Policy makers should consider using our findings in their decision-making process for adding IVIG to corticosteroids as the second-line therapy for steroid-refractory DM patients.
At a threshold of US$4672 per QALY gained, IVIG plus corticosteroids is considered a cost-effective treatment for steroid-resistant CIDP patients in Thailand.
Background: Thalassemia is a genetic blood disorder with high incidence in Thailand. Its treatment includes blood transfusion and iron chelating therapy for life long that lead to high cost. Therefore, effective screening processes are required to prevent the newborn with thalassemia.
Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of prenatal screening program for thalassemia between a semi-accelerated screening program and the current program.
Methods: Decision tree model was developed under provider perspective. Cost, effectiveness and probabilities data were from literature review. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to explore around inputs in the model.
Results: The expected costs of the semi-accelerated screening program and the current program were ฿609.29 and ฿462.44, respectively. The expected outcomes to detect a severe thalassemia in fetuses from the semi-accelerated program and the current program is 34 cases and 8 cases in 10 000 couples, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was ฿57 499.80 per case detected.
Conclusions: The expected costs of the semi-accelerated screening program was higher than the current programs, but the number of fetuses with thalassemia detected from the semi-accelerated screening program was more than the current programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.