Objective To determine how Japanese patients with lung cancer weigh potential survival, chemotherapy response rate, and symptom relief against the potential toxicity of different treatments in cancer chemotherapy. Methods and PatientsWe used a questionnaire describing a hypothetical situation about stage IV nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Seventy-three patients with lung cancer who had received chemotherapy and 120 patients with other respiratory disease as the control group were asked to rate the minimal benefit that would make two hypothetical treatments acceptable. For "chance of cure," "response but not cure," and "symptom relief," the subjects could give answers from 1% to 100% and for prolonging life could give answers from 1 to 60 months.Results Patients with lung cancer were significantly more likely than were patients with other respiratory diseases to accept either intensive or less-intensive treatments for a potentially small benefit for "chance of cure," "response but not cure," and "symptom relief". The degree of survival advantage that patients require before accepting cancer treatment with its associated toxicity varied widely. If their lives were prolonged 3 months, 19% and 21% of patients with lung cancer would choose to receive intensive and less-intensive treatment, respectively. When the chance of symptom relief was 70%, 73% of patients with lung cancer were willing to choose intensive chemotherapy. Factor associated with patients' choice of chemotherapy in both groups was age.Conclusion Oncologists must consider the substantial range of attitudes to chemotherapy among patients when making treatment decisions and they must give patients the opportunity to be included in this process. (Internal Medicine 44: 107-113, 2005)

No abstract

The pharmacokinetics of (glycolato-0,0')-diammine platinum (II) (254-S; NSC 375101D), one of the new platinum analogues, was examined in a phase I study of this drug and compared with that of cisplatin and carboplatin. All drugs were given in short-term (30-min) i.v. drip infusions; the doses of 254-S, cisplatin, and carboplatin were 100, 80, and 450 mg/m2, respectively. Platinum concentrations in whole plasma, plasma ultrafiltrate, and urine were determined by atomic absorption spectrometry. After the infusion, the plasma concentration of total platinum for the three agents decayed biphasically. Ultrafilterable platinum in plasma decreased in a biexponential mode after infusions of 254-S and carboplatin, whereas the free platinum of cisplatin showed a monoexponential disappearance. The peak plasma concentrations and AUC for free platinum were 5.31 micrograms/ml and 959 micrograms/min per ml for 254-S, 3.09 micrograms/ml and 208 micrograms/min per ml for cisplatin, and 19.90 micrograms/ml and 3446 micrograms/min per ml for carboplatin, respectively. The mean ratio of plasma ultrafilterable platinum to total platinum were calculated, and the results showed that the protein-binding abilities of 254-S and carboplatin were almost identical. More than 50% of the 254-S was excreted in the urine within the first 480 min after its administration. Thrombocytopenia was reported as a dose-limiting toxicity for both 254-S and carboplatin. This similarity in side effects may mainly be due to the comparable pharmacokinetic behavior of these two platinum compounds.

Tumor cells that have acquired resistance to gefitinib through continuous drug administration may complicate future treatment.

No abstract