Objective To describe variations in genital dimensions of normal women.Design Observational cross-sectional study.Setting Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Hospital, University College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.Population Fifty premenopausal women having gynaecological procedures not involving the external genitalia under general anaesthetic. Methods A cross sectional study using digital photography and measurements of the external genitalia.Main outcome measures Clitoral size, labial length and width, colour and rugosity, vaginal length, distance from clitoris to urethral orifice, distance from posterior fourchette to anterior anal margin. Results A wide range of values were noted for each measurement. There was no statistically significant association with age, parity, ethnicity, hormonal use or history of sexual activity. Conclusion Women vary widely in genital dimensions. This information should be made available to women when considering surgical procedures on the genitals, decisions for which must be carefully considered between surgeon and woman.

SummaryOur knowledge of the experience of adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) as they pass through life is only now emerging. In this review we gather medical, surgical and psychological literature pertaining to adults with CAH and consider this alongside practical experience gained from a dedicated adult CAH clinic. There is increasing awareness for the need for multidisciplinary teams who have knowledge of CAH particularly with respect to gynaecological surgery and clinical psychology for women and testicular function in men.Routine management of CAH comprises adjustment of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid treatment according to individual needs balancing biochemical markers, compliance and long term risks. Bone density is one such long term concern and is not greatly reduced in most individuals with CAH. More recently, attention has turned to cardiovascular risk factors and catecholamine deficiency in adults with CAH.Women with CAH require access to an experienced gynaecologist, specialised pregnancy care and psychosexual support. The very low fertility rates for women with CAH previously reported appear to be improving with time. Men with CAH are often lost to follow up and therefore miss out on surveillance for hypogonadism either through the effect of adrenal rests of from suppression of gonadotrophins resulting in a high prevalence of oligospermia.

Genital sensitivity is impaired in areas where feminizing genital surgery had been done and impairment to sensitivity are linearly related to difficulties in sexual function. The new information may help inform clinicians and parents making difficult decisions about genital surgery for infants with ambiguous genitalia.

in the clitoris and vagina using a genitosensory analyser and Von Frey filaments. RESULTSAll six women had highly abnormal results for sensation in the clitoris. Only three of them had an introitus capable of admitting the vaginal probe, and the vaginal sensory data of all three were within the validated ranges. A self-administered sexual function assessment was completed by the five women who were sexually active. The scores indicated sexual difficulties, particularly in the areas of infrequency of intercourse and anorgasmia. CONCLUSIONSThe sensory data for all six women were outside the normal range for the clitoris. The results for the upper vagina, which had not had surgery, were within normal ranges. These findings suggest that genital surgery may disrupt sensory input. Sexual function also appears to be impaired and this may relate to the compromised sensitivity and restricted introitus. The possibility that women with CAH have deficient clitoral sensation ab initio cannot be excluded. These striking findings must be evaluated further in the light of the controversy about the issue of genital surgery in children with CAH.

Objective To assess clinical characteristics and expectations in well women requesting elective labial reduction surgery.Design Prospective study of women attending an outpatient gynaecology clinic.Setting General gynaecology clinic at a Central London teaching hospital.Sample Women requesting labial reduction surgery and referred by their general practitioner.Methods The labia minora width and length were measured for all participants for comparison with published normal values. The presenting complaint was recorded, along with demographic details, expectations of surgery and sources of information regarding appearance of the labia.Main outcome measures Labial measurements, reported symptoms and expectations of surgery.Results The labia of all participants were within normal published limits, with a mean (SD) of 26.9 (12.8) mm (right labia), and 24.8 (13.1) mm (left labia). The majority of complaints were regarding appearance or discomfort. Expectations were to alter the appearance with surgery.Conclusions All women seeking surgery had normal-sized labia minora. Clear guidance is needed for clinicians on how best to care for the worried well woman seeking surgery.

Reconstructive surgery has been the traditional treatment for the short vagina. Recently vaginal dilation has been recommended due to its low morbidity. Small retrospective studies have reported success rates of up to 80% but include neither clear definitions of "success" nor exploration of factors associated with compliance and outcome. The first 10 women prescribed vaginal dilation treatment at a specialist gynaecological clinic during the study period were interviewed and asked to complete the Multi-dimensional Sexuality Questionnaire (MSQ), with an assessment of perceived vaginal characteristics. The participants scored lower scores on sexual esteem, sexual assertiveness and sexual satisfaction and higher scores in sexual anxiety, sexual depression and fear of sexual relationships in comparison with the standardisation sample. Dilator treatment must be subject to the same scrutiny as any intervention. Vaginal dilation can have a negative emotional impact on women and psychological intervention may be needed to maximise efficacy.

It is paramount that any child or adolescent with a suspected difference or disorder of sex development (DSD) is assessed by an experienced clinician with adequate knowledge about the range of conditions associated with DSD and is discussed with the regional DSD service. In most cases, the paediatric endocrinologist within this service acts as the first point of contact but involvement of the regional multidisciplinary service will also ensure prompt access to specialist psychology and nursing care. The underlying pathophysiology of DSD and the process of delineating this should be discussed with the parents and affected young person with all diagnostic tests undertaken in a timely fashion. Finally, for rare conditions such as these, it is imperative that clinical experience is shared through national and international clinical and research collaborations.

Objective To quantify participants' experiences of obtaining and giving information about disorders of sex development (DSD).Design Cross-sectional survey study that asked people about their current and past experiences relating to DSD disclosure.Setting A large tertiary referral centre for DSD management in the UK.Population One hundred of 126 people with a confirmed diagnosis of DSD who were invited to participate in the study formed the usable sample.Methods All people who attended clinic for follow-up during the study period and members of a patient support group whose annual meeting fell within the study period were asked to complete the Middlesex Communication Survey.Main outcome measures The Middlesex Communication Survey.Results Younger participants were more likely to report having been appropriately informed about their diagnosis than older people. Nearly half of the former had been fully informed about their diagnosis by age 15 years, compared with 0% of the older age group. In terms of information sharing, mothers were most likely to be the person with whom the participant had shared (almost/all) DSD information (74%), followed by current partners (71%). Information relating to genital surgery, presence of testes and clitoral anomalies were the least likely aspects to have been unambiguously shared with even the most informed person.Conclusions Our results suggest that difficulties in obtaining DSD information from care providers were common, and that communication has improved for younger participants. The study also confirmed that many people with DSD continue to struggle with confiding, even in those closest to them, about aspects of their diagnosis. Care protocol needs to centralise psychological adaptation, which should also be a primary focus for future research.