parabolas in Figure 7 and are listed in Table I. As can be seen from this table, the good agreement between the equilibrium constants determined separately by the computer simulation and those determined by the experimental approach stresses the validity of mechanism 1. This fact moreover supports the coordinate adsorption of the meta1,ions reported by McBride.13 Plots of e,'" and PTiP;t vs. the hydrolysis constant of M2+, Kh, are shown in Figure 8, showing the correlation between them. This correlation reveals that the surface complexes, -A10M(H20),,+ and -A10MOH(H20),2, result from the hydrolysis of the metal ion adsorbed, Le., surface hydrolysis.The applicability of the model proposed to the similar experimental results reported by Hohl and Stumm, where the concentration of metal ion is fairly dilute compared with the present experimental conditions,s was examined, and their results could be interpreted by mechanism I. On the other hand, Davis and Leckie have also explained by their model the results reported by Hohl and Stumm.]] In conclusion, both models can be applied to experimental results obtained at fairly dilute concentrations In aqueous y-A1203 suspensions containing divalent metal ions Cuz+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Co2+, and Pb2+, double relaxations were observed by using the pressure-jump technique with electric conductivity detection. For all y-A1203-metal ion systems, both fast and slow relaxation times decrease with the concentration of metal ions and increase with that of protons. From the kinetic results obtained, the fast and slow relaxations were attributed to simultaneous adsorption-desorption of metal ions on surface sites of the largest fraction and on the remaining sites existing on a y-A120, surfaae, respectively. It was found that the order of adsorption rate constants of metal ions corresponds to that of the rate constants for the release of a water molecule from the hydrated metal ions in homogeneous metal complex systems.