The study found that approximately one in ten older adults used potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. Several predisposing, enabling and need factors were associated with the use of potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications. Concerted efforts are needed to optimize potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults.

SummaryBackgroundFactors associated with mortality and disease progression in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are poorly understood.AimsTo assess the impact of liver disease severity, demographics and comorbidities on all‐cause mortality and liver disease progression in a large, real‐world cohort of NAFLD patients.MethodsClaims data from the German Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung database between 2011 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Adult patients diagnosed with NAFLD and/or NASH were categorised as NAFLD, NAFLD non‐progressors, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, liver transplant or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The longitudinal probability of mortality and incidence of progression were calculated for disease severity cohorts and multivariable analyses performed for adjusted mortality.ResultsAmong 4 580 434 patients in the database, prevalence of NAFLD was 4.7% (n = 215 655). Of those, 36.8% were non‐progressors, 0.2% compensated cirrhosis, 9.6% decompensated cirrhosis, 0.0005% liver transplant and 0.2% HCC. Comorbidity rates were significantly higher in compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and HCC compared with non‐progressors. The longitudinal probability of mortality for non‐progressors, compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis and HCC was 3.6%, 18.7%, 28.8% and 68%, respectively. Independent predictors of mortality included cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity and renal impairment. The cumulative incidence of progression in NAFLD and compensated cirrhosis patients was 10.7% and 16.7%, respectively, over 5 years of follow‐up.ConclusionNAFLD patients were severely under‐diagnosed and had a high probability of mortality that increased with disease progression. Early identification and effective management to halt or reverse fibrosis are essential to prevent progression.

PurposeThis study examined real-world long-term use of guideline-recommended bone targeted agents (BTA) among patients with metastatic solid tumors.MethodsAdults with a solid tumor diagnosis followed by a bone metastasis diagnosis in 2012–2014 were identified from electronic medical records in the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. Patients initiated zoledronic acid (ZA) or denosumab on or after the bone metastasis diagnosis and were followed through last clinic visit by 30 June 2015. We describe time to BTA initiation, compliance (≥12 administrations in a year), switching, and non-persistence (switch or ≥90 day gap in therapy), by agent and follow-up period.ResultsThe majority of the 14,881 study patients (50% female, 65% age ≥65 years) had breast (33%), prostate (26%), or lung (26%) tumors. Half of all patients initiated on each agent, with denosumab initiations exceeding ZA initiations in 2014. Most (91% denosumab, 93% ZA) initiations occurred within 3 months of bone metastasis diagnosis. At 1, 2, and 3 years post-initiation, denosumab patients were less likely to switch agents (4, 3, and 1% versus 14, 12, and 11%) and more likely to be compliant (50, 37, and 31% versus 41, 26, and 6%). Median time to non-persistence was 25.9 months for denosumab and 17.2 months for ZA, p < 0.0001.ConclusionsThis is the first study reporting long-term treatment patterns for the two primary BTAs used in the USA. The greater compliance and longer persistence observed among denosumab patients may improve treatment effectiveness achieved in the real-world setting.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3583-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

The rising prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) presents many public health challenges, including a substantial impact on healthcare resource utilization and costs. There are important regional differences in the burden of NAFLD/NASH, and Spain-specific data are lacking. This retrospective, observational study examined the impact of liver disease severity, comorbidities, and demographics on healthcare resource utilization and costs in Spain. NAFLD/NASH patients in the Spanish National Health System's Hospital Discharge Records Database (1/1/2006 to 4/30/2017) were categorized into disease severity cohorts as NAFLD/NASH overall, NAFLD/NASH non-progressors, compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), liver transplant (LT), or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients were followed from index date until the earliest of 6 months, disease progression, end of coverage, death, or end of study. Within each cohort, pre- and post-index healthcare resource utilization and costs per patient per month (PPPM) were calculated. A total of 8,205 patients (mean age 58.4; 54% male) were identified; 5,984 (72.9%) were non-progressors, 139 (1.7%) progressed to CC, 2,028 (24.7%) to DCC, 115 (1.4%) to LT, and 61 (0.7%) to HCC. Pre-index comorbidity burden was high across disease cohorts, and the frequency of comorbidities increased with disease severity. From pre- to post-index, average length of stay (LOS) increased significantly (23%–41%) as did all-cause PPPM costs (44%–46%), with significantly longer LOS and costs in patients with increasing disease severity. Progression of NAFLD/NASH was associated with significantly higher costs and longer LOS. A coordinated approach is needed to manage resources and costs in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Selective antimuscarinics may offer a favorable safety profile over non-selective antimuscarinics for the management of overactive bladder (OAB) in patients with dementia. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that non-selective antimuscarinics are associated with increased risk of mortality compared to selective antimuscarinics in older adults with dementia and OAB. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched retrospective newuser cohort design among Medicare beneficiaries in community settings. PATIENTS: Older adults with dementia and OAB with incident antimuscarinic use. MAIN MEASURES: The primary exposure was antimuscarinic medications classified as non-selective (oxybutynin, tolterodine, trospium, fesoterodine) and selective (solifenacin, darifenacin) agents. All-cause mortality within 180 days of incident antimuscarinic use formed the outcome measure. New users of non-selective and selective antimuscarinics were matched on propensity scores using the Greedy 5 → 1 matching technique. Cox proportional-hazards model stratified on matched pairs was used to evaluate the risk of mortality associated with the use of non-selective versus selective antimuscarinics in the sample. KEY RESULTS: The study identified 16,955 (77.6%) nonselective antimuscarinic users and 4893 (22.4%) selective antimuscarinic users. Propensity score matching yielded 4862 patients in each group. The unadjusted mortality rate at 180 days was 2.6% (126) for non-selective and 1.6% (78) for selective antimuscarinic users in the matched cohort (p value < 0.01). The Cox model stratified on matched pairs found 50% higher risk of 180-day mortality with non-selective antimuscarinics as compared to selective ones (hazard ratio (HR) 1.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-2.16). The study findings remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Use of non-selective antimuscarinics was associated with a 50% increase in mortality risk among older adults with dementia and OAB. Given the safety concerns regarding non-selective antimuscarinic agents, there is a significant need to optimize their use in the management of OAB for older patients with dementia.

This study found that antimuscarinic medications are commonly prescribed for elderly patients with OAB and there is variation in antimuscarinic use across age and region.