BackgroundAlthough the combination of cyclophosphamide and rituximab has been utilized in case reports, there are no previous reports of the long term outcome of SLE treated systematically with this regimen. We report a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of a systematically administered course of rituximab and cyclophosphamide over an eighteen month period to provide sustained improvement in childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).FindingsTwelve patients with childhood onset lupus nephritis or corticosteroid resistant SLE received systematic treatment with a combination of rituximab (750 mg/M2 up to 1 gram) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/M2: no patient exceeded 1.8 M2). Two administrations of rituximab and cyclophosphamide, two weeks apart, were administered at the start of study, six months later, and eighteen months later. Clinical data were collected and analyzed after sixty months of follow up. There was sustained improvement in all clinical parameters with a dramatic reduction in both mean SLEDAI score (10.1 to 1 at one year and 0 at five years p<0.005) and mean daily prednisone dosage (29.7 mg/day to 12.7 by one year and 7.0 mg/day at five years p<0.005), with sustained improvement in mean C3 (55.5 mg/ml to 113 at one year and 107.5 at five years p<0.001) which was maintained through sixty months of follow up. Serum immunoglobulin levels were transiently depressed but mean values were within the normal range for both IgG and IgM at one and five years. Few complications were observed (two episodes of febrile neutropenia during the first year of treatment were the only serious adverse events) and patients routinely reported sustained wellbeing.ConclusionsThis pilot study demonstrates that a systematically administered course of rituximab and cyclophosphamide over an eighteen month period provided sustained relief for patients with childhood onset SLE which was maintained over a sixty month period, while minimizing the need for corticosteroids, without excessive toxicity.

Abstract. In India, treatment of acute, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria is becoming increasingly difficult due to resistance to chloroquine, thus there is a need for new antimalarial drugs. CGP 56697 (co-artemether), a new drug, is a combination of artemether and lumefantrine in a single oral formulation (one tablet ϭ 20 mg of artemether plus 120 mg of lumefantrine). In a double-blind study, 179 patients with acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to receive either CGP (n ϭ 89) given as a short course of 4 ϫ 4 tablets over a 48-hr period or chloroquine (n ϭ 90) given as four tablets (one tablet ϭ 150 mg of chloroquine base) initially, followed by two tablets each at 6-8, 24, and 48 hr. Due to a death in the chloroquine group and a decrease in the chloroquine cure rate to Ͻ 50% (based on the blinded overall cure rate at that time), recruitment was terminated prematurely. CGP 56697 showed a superior 28-day cure rate (95.4% versus 19.7%; P Ͻ 0.001), time to parasite clearance (median ϭ 36 versus 60 hr; P Ͻ 0.001), and resolution of fever (median ϭ 18 versus 27 hr; P ϭ 0.0456). This drug provides a safe, effective, and rapid therapy for the treatment of acute uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria.

Introduction: In 2015 the historic Jones criteria for the diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever (ARF) were revised introducing two different sets of criteria for low-risk and for moderate/high-risk populations (according to ARF incidence). In Italy the exact ARF incidence is unknown but small regional or local reports suggest an incidence of 2-5/100.000 per year, suggesting that our population might be considered at moderate risk for ARF. Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the revised Jones criteria in a retrospective population and to compare it with the performance of the previous version of Jones criteria. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 288 patients with ARF (108 female; median age 8.5 years, IQR 7.1-10.3) diagnosed from 2001 to 2015 in a Pediatric Rheumatology Division by pediatric rheumatologists, discharged with an ICD 9 code consistent with ARF. We retrospectively applied the two sets (for low-risk and for moderate/high-risk) of the 2015 revised Jones criteria and the 1992 version of the Jones criteria. Results: Of 288 patients, 253 (87.8%) met the 1992 version of the Jones criteria, 237 (82.3%) met the revised criteria for low-risk populations and 259 (89.9%) for moderate/high-risk populations. None of these differences was significant. Prevalence of major and minor criteria is shown in Table. With the exception of difference in arthritis, the 1992 version and the 2015 revised version did not show major differences. Of the 288 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARF 29 did not meet any version of the Jones criteria. Patients in this group presented with isolated chorea or silent carditis without other manifestations. Prevalence of the clinical characteristics and comparison among the 1992 version of Jones criteria and the 2015 revised Jones criteria (low risk and moderate-high risk populations): Values are expressed in Number (percentage). *p value (Fisher Exact test) Conclusion: The revised Jones criteria for low-risk populations are slightly more sensitive than the 1992 version of Jones criteria, while the revised Jones criteria for moderate/high populations are slightly less sensitive than the 1992 version. In this population, the revised criteria did not substantially modify the diagnosis of ARF. Approximately 10% of patients presented with isolated chorea or silent carditis.

No abstract