Sensory thresholds are defined according to a criterion level of performance in a particular psychophysical task. Thus, thresholds are a function of both subject sensitivity and method. However, relatively few studies have directly compared methods using the same subjects and stimulus. In the current work, thresholds for amyl acetate were measured for 19 subjects using three different methods. Results from a modified method of constant stimuli, which directly measures full detection functions, served as a "gold standard" to establish validity. These results were compared to two less intensive "shortcut" methods, viz., a forced-choice ascending method of limits and a staircase procedure. Both rapid methods produced mean threshold values comparable to those from the method of constant stimuli. Thus, both methods provided a reasonable estimate of average threshold. For characterizing individual differences, the validity of both methods seemed largely limited by their reliability. The staircase procedure may outperform the ascending method of limits in characterizing individual differences, but neither method is exceptionally strong in this respect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.