Background Thoracic epidural placement (TEP) using the conventional anatomic landmark-based technique is technically challenging, may require multiple attempts, and is associated with a high failure rate (12–40%). We hypothesized that real-time ultrasound guidance would be superior in the “first-pass” success rate of TEP, when compared with the conventional technique. Methods This prospective, randomized, superiority trial was conducted in a University hospital, and recruited 96 patients undergoing elective major abdominal or thoracic surgery and scheduled to receive a TEP for postoperative analgesia. Patients were randomly allocated to receive TEP using either the conventional technique (Gp-Conv, n = 48) or real-time ultrasound guidance (Gp-Usg, n = 48). The success of TEP was defined as eliciting loss of resistance technique and being able to insert the epidural catheter. The primary outcome variable was the “first-pass success rate” meaning the successful TEP at the first needle insertion without redirection or readvancement of the Tuohy needle. The secondary outcomes included the number of skin punctures, number of attempts, the overall success rate, TEP time, and total procedure time. Results The first-pass success rate of TEP was significantly higher (p = 0.002) in Gp-Usg (33/48 (68.8%); 95%CI 55.6 to 81.9) than in Gp-Conv (17/48 (35.4%); 95%CI 21.9 to 49.0). There was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.12) in the overall success rate of TEP between the 2 study groups (Gp-Usg; 48/48 (100%) vs. Gp-Conv; 44/48 (91.7%); 95%CI 83.9 to 99.5). Ultrasound guidance reduced the median number of skin punctures (Gp-Usg; 1 [1, 1] vs Gp-Conv; 2 [1, 2.2], p < 0.001) and attempts at TEP (Gp-Usg; 1 [1, 2] vs Gp-Conv; 3 [1, 7.2], p < 0.001) but the procedure took longer to perform (Gp-Usg; 15.5 [14, 20] min vs Gp-Conv; 10 [7, 14] min, p < 0.001). Conclusions This study indicates that real-time ultrasound guidance is superior to a conventional anatomic landmark-based technique for first-pass success during TEP although it is achieved at the expense of a marginally longer total procedure time. Future research is warranted to evaluate the role of real-time ultrasound guidance for TEP in other groups of patients. Trial registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry; http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/; Trial ID: TCTR20200522002, Registration date: 22/05/2020.
Purpose To assess improvements in the validity and reliability of novices’ skills in performing ultrasonography for airway assessment. Patients and Methods A learning cohort study was conducted with 20 anesthesiology residents and 10 volunteers in the Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University. The four parameters of airway assessment were soft tissue thickness at the level of 1) hyoid bone (STT-HY), 2) true vocal cords (STT-VC), 3) thyroid isthmus (STT-TI), and 4) suprasternal notch (STT-SN). The magnitude of discrepancies between the residents’ and experienced anesthesiologists’ measurements was evaluated over the sequence of measurements in the 10 volunteers. Results The mean ultrasonic measurements of STT-HY by the experienced anesthesiologists and residents were significantly different (11.09 ± 3.14 mm vs 8.53 ± 3.02 mm, respectively; P = 0.008), whereas measurements of STT-VC, STT-TI, and STT-SN were not (7.18 ± 1.70 vs 7.14 ± 1.93, P = 0.32; 7.81 ± 2.14 vs 7.73 ± 2.19, P = 0.62; and 11.32 ± 3.33 vs 10.30 ± 3.02, P = 0.35, respectively). The mean discrepancy between the residents’ and experienced anesthesiologists’ measurements was close to zero throughout the sequence of measurements of STT-TI and STT-VC. However, the residents’ measurements of STT-HY and STT-SN were considerably lower than those of anesthesiologists. The range of discrepancies between residents and experienced anesthesiologists in each sequential measurement was wide for all measurements, particularly for the measurement values of STT-HY, and the standard deviation of the discrepancies did not decrease over the sequence of measurements. Conclusion Over the sequence of measurements for airway assessment in 10 volunteers by 20 residents in this learning trial, we found no evidence of improvement in measurement accuracy. Discrepancies between the residents’ and anesthesiologists’ measurements and the variability in discrepancy across residents were greatest in the measurement of STT-HY.
Background: Emergence agitation is one of the unpleasant symptoms after general anesthesia, especially in pediatric patients. This study was designed to evaluate the correlation between emergence time and emergence agitation. The predictors associated with emergence agitation and behavioral changes in children was also determined as specific outcomes.Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in children undergoing anesthesia between 3 to 12 years. The preoperative unit nurse evaluated the child's baseline behaviors preoperatively. From pre to post anesthesia period, nurse anesthetist recorded anesthetic management data and clinical emergence time. Meanwhile, the investigator team recorded the Processed-EEG emergence time. At the Post-Anesthetic Care Unit (PACU), the well trained PACU nurse evaluated clinical emergence time and emergence symptoms. For the behavioral symptoms, the investigator team evaluated any changes by telephone interview at postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05. Results: Ninety-one pediatric patients were enrolled in the study. Preoperative baseline behaviors were not related to emergence agitation or behavioral changes. There were correlations between clinical emergence time and the incidences of emergence agitation and postoperative separation anxiety. There was no relationship found between processed-EEG emergence time and the incidence of emergence agitation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the significant predictors (ASA physical status, clinical emergence time, and pain) to predict Emergence agitation. (AUC=0.92, sensitivity = 0.89, specificity 0.81). Separation anxiety was significantly higher at postoperative days 1,3 and 7 in the children with emergence agitation (p-values = 0.020, 0.020, and 0.017, respectively).Conclusion: Clinical emergence time significantly related to emergence agitation and postoperative separation anxiety.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03358069. Registered 18 January 2017 - Retrospectively registered, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S0007IOW&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0001FGB&ts=2&cx=-7ofx36
O bj e cti ve : O bj e cti ve : To determinethe effect-site concentration (Cp50) of propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) for second-generation of four different types of supraglottic airway device insertion. Me thods: Me thods: This prospective randomized double blinded trial study was conducted in June 2012 after approved by the ethics committee of Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. Fourty patients were randomly allocated into four groups. The first patient of each group received a propofol TCI effect-site concentration of 4 µg/ml. Propofol targets were determined by means of the modified Dixon's up-and-down method. After equilibration was established between the plasma and effect-site concentrations, the I-gel™, Supreme™, ProSeal™ and Laryngeal Tube Suction II™ were inserted in each group. The Cp50 of propofol was recorded after a successful insertion was achieved. Other outcomes included overall hemodynamic response and complications. The differences in characteristics among groups were tested with Fisher's exact test for categorical data and the Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variables (Cp50 of propofol) while median and range were displayed. Multiple linear regression and general estimating equation were used to determine factors associated with the change in systolic, diastolic, mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.