We evaluated the potential utility of occult circulating tumor DNA as a molecular marker of disease in subjects previously diagnosed with breast cancer. Using 24 microsatellite markers located at sites of frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or allele imbalance in breast cancer, we analyzed DNA from 16 primary tumors (Stage IIA or more advanced) and 30 longitudinally collected plasma specimens. Clinical data at the time of plasma collection were obtained. All 16 tumors were characterized by an individual pattern of LOH. LOH was detected in 12 of 30 (40%) plasma samples, taken from 8 of 14 (57%) subjects. However, the number of LOH in plasma was small (n ؍ 15), and the mean proportion of LOH was much lower than in the tumors (0.05 vs. 0.52). Although infrequent, 12 of 15 (80%) plasma LOH were concordant with abnormalities in the paired tumors, and the mean percent LOH was higher than in normal plasmas, suggesting that they were authentic tumor-derived abnormalities. We found, despite this, no association, between plasma LOH and tumor stage or clinical status at time of blood collection (i.e., LOH was as common in subjects with no evident disease as in those with evident disease). In addition, detection of LOH was not consistent between serial samples from 5 of 11 subjects (45%), despite stable clinical conditions. No association with clinical outcome was evident, although the sample size was small. Microsatellite instability in plasma was infrequent, nonconcordant with paired tumor and inconsistent in serial samples. This pilot study suggests that identifying tumor-specific LOH in the plasma of breast cancer subjects may not be useful for detecting occult metastases or for monitoring disease. Other detection techniques may be more promising, but circulating tumor DNA may not be a sufficiently accurate reflection of breast cancer clinical status or tumor activity.
Background Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, affecting over 1.5 million women every year, which accounts for the highest number of cancer-related deaths in women globally. Hereditary breast cancer (HBC), an important subset of breast cancer, accounts for 5–10% of total cases. However, in Low Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), the population-specific risk of HBC in different ethnicities and the correlation with certain clinical characteristics remain unexplored. Methods Retrospective chart review of patients who visited the HBC clinic and proceeded with multi-gene panel testing from May 2017 to April 2020. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze clinical characteristics of patients. Fisher’s exact, Pearson’s chi-squared tests and Logistic regression analysis were used for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for quantitative variables. For comparison between two independent groups, Mann-Whitney test was performed. Results were considered significant at a p value of < 0.05. Results Out of 273 patients, 22% tested positive, 37% had a VUS and 41% had a negative genetic test result. Fifty-five percent of the positive patients had pathogenic variants in either BRCA1 or BRCA2, while the remaining positive results were attributed to other genes. Patients with a positive result had a younger age at diagnosis compared to those having a VUS and a negative result; median age 37.5 years, IQR (Interquartile range) (31.5–48). Additionally, patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) were almost 3 times more likely to have a positive result (OR = 2.79, CI = 1.42–5.48 p = 0.003). Of all patients with positive results, 25% of patients had a negative family history of breast and/or related cancers. Conclusions In our HBC clinic, we observed that our rate of positive results is comparable, yet at the higher end of the range which is reported in other populations. The importance of expanded, multi-gene panel testing is highlighted by the fact that almost half of the patients had pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in genes other than BRCA1/2, and that our test positivity rate would have only been 12.8% if only BRCA1/2 testing was done. As the database expands and protocol-driven referrals are made across the country, our insight about the genetic architecture of HBC in our population will continue to increase.
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES), first introduced in 1996, is a neurotoxic state characterised by seizures, headache, vision change, paresis, nausea and altered mental status. Risk factors include hypertension, eclampsia/pre-eclampsia, infection/sepsis and cancer chemotherapy. Although exposure to toxic agents is a common occurrence in patients who develop PRES, oxaliplatin has rarely been associated with it, with only 10 cases reported worldwide. We present the case of an oxaliplatin-induced PRES in a 23-year-old male patient who was started on oxaliplatin/capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for anal canal adenocarcinoma. The patient developed symptoms of headache, slurred speech and left-sided facial weakness on the ninth day after the first dose of oxaliplatin that lasted for 6-8 hours. The patient experienced another episode next day with similar symptoms that lasted for 8 hours. Oxaliplatin was withheld and the patient was discharged on capecitabine only. The patient had no new episodes since discharge on follow-up.
Malignancies of gastro-intestinal tract cause stricture formation that leads to intestinal obstruction. In such cases, either surgery or placement of self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) are options of palliation. For left sided colorectal obstruction, SEMS have been widely used and reported. Luminal stenting is not always an easy task to perform because of altered anatomy of the surrounding structures, specially in the right side of colon and terminal ileum. SEMS placement, particularly in the ileocecal region, is technically difficult. Few studies on SEMS deployment in right sided colon have been reported till now. We report a case of metastatic signet ring cell carcinoma of rectosigmoid junction with malignant terminal ileal stricture palliation done with placement of SEMS.
Background: Systemic chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic breast cancer, with an undecided role in surgery. Limited data is available for the role of surgery on the overall survival of stage 4 breast cancer regarding luminal subtypes of patients. This is a retrospective data analysis comparing overall survival benefit and disease-free survival in stage IV breast cancer after systemic treatment and systemic disease control concerning luminal classification in the last five years. Method: Patients who had surgery and no surgery after systemic treatment and disease control were compared for 5 years overall survival as the primary endpoint and disease-free survival as the secondary endpoint. The survival benefit was also compared regarding tumor biology (ER/PR, HER2 status). Results: Data included 421 patients, 237 in surgery and 184 in no surgery group. At one year survival for surgery performed and not performed was not significant. Five-year overall survival for surgery performed and not performed was 84.4% and 74.5%. A statistically significant difference in survival rates was observed (p<0.0001). The mortality rate was 15.6% in surgery performed and 25.5% in the no-surgery group which showed a significant difference among the two study groups (p=0.011). We found statistically significant differences in luminal B (p=0.004) and triple-negative breast cancer patients (p=0.001) for survival rates in surgery performed and not performed groups. Disease-free survival has shown no significant difference in surgery performed and not performed group in 1, 2, and 5 years follow-up. Conclusion: Surgery has a positive impact on overall survival in Stage 4 patients with systemic disease control even in high-risk luminal B, Her 2 Positive, and triple-negative breast cancer patients. There was no significant difference observed in disease-free survival who were operated on or not. However, there was no local recurrence in the operated group.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.