Background There is growing concern about potential overuse of, and toxicity from, opioid analgesics. No nationally representative study has examined inter-state variations in opioid use and impact of policy on opioid use among older adults. Methods We used national Medicare data from 2007-2012 to assess temporal and geographic trends in rates of opioid prescription and relationship to opioid toxicity and different state regulations in Part D Medicare recipients. We excluded those with a cancer diagnosis. Multilevel, multivariable regression analyses evaluated rates of prolonged prescriptions for schedule II, schedule III, and combination II/III opioid for each state, adjusting for patient characteristics. Results The percent of Part D recipients receiving prescriptions for combined schedule II/III opioid more than 90 days in a year increased from 4.62% in 2007 to 7.35% in 2012. Large variations existed among states in rates of opioid prescriptions: from 2.84% in New York to 10.93% in Utah, in 2012 data. The state variation was larger for schedule III than schedule II. Individual characteristics independently associated with prolonged use included older age, female gender, white race, low-income, living in a lower education area, and comorbidity of drug abuse, rheumatoid arthritis, depression. Only state law regulating pain clinic was associated with reduction of schedule II opioid prescriptions. Prolonged opioid prescription use increased the odds of opioid overdose-related emergency room visits or hospitalization by 60%. Conclusions Analyses of Medicare Part D data demonstrated a substantial growth in opioid prescriptions from 2007 to 2011 and large variation in opioid prescriptions across states.

No abstract

The optimal timing of initiating corticosteroid treatment in hospitalized patients is unknown. We aimed to assess the relationship between timing of initial corticosteroid treatment and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. In this observational study through medical record analysis, we quantified the mortality benefit of corticosteroids in two equally matched groups of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. We subsequently evaluated the timing of initiating corticosteroids and its effect on mortality in all patients receiving corticosteroids. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables were collected and employed for multivariable regression analyses. 1461 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 were analyzed. Of these, 760 were also matched into two equal groups based on having received corticosteroid therapy. Patients receiving corticosteroids had a lower risk of death than those who did not (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.67-0.90; p = 0.01). Timing of corticosteroids was assessed for all 615 patients receiving corticosteroids during admission. Patients receiving first dose of corticosteroids > 72 h into hospitalization had a lower risk of death compared to patients with first dose at earlier time intervals (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.82; p = 0.003). There was a mortality benefit in patients with > 7 days of symptom onset to initiation of corticosteroids (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.95; p = 0.03). In patients receiving oxygen therapy, corticosteroids reduced risk of death in mechanically ventilated patients (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.24-0.60; p < 0.001) but not in patients on high-flow or other oxygen therapy (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-1.07; p = 0.07) and (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.35-2.00; p = 0.69), respectively. Timing of corticosteroids initiation was related to in-hospital mortality for COVID-19 patients. Time from symptom onset > 7 days should trigger initiation of corticosteroids. In the absence of invasive mechanical ventilation, corticosteroids should be initiated if the patient remains hospitalized at 72 h. Hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygen therapy should not be a trigger for initiation of corticosteroids unless the timing is appropriate.

Study objective: Ultrasonographically guided intravenous peripheral catheters have dismal dwell time, with most intravenous lines failing before completion of therapy. Catheter length in the vein is directly related to catheter longevity. We investigate the survival of an ultralong ultrasonographically guided intravenous peripheral catheter compared with a standard long one. Methods: We conducted a single-site, nonblinded, randomized trial of catheter survival. Adult patients presenting to the emergency department with difficult vascular access were recruited and randomized to receive either standard long, 4.78-cm, 20gauge ultrasonographically guided intravenous peripheral catheters or ultralong, 6.35-cm, 20-gauge ultrasonographically guided intravenous peripheral catheters. The primary outcome was duration of catheter survival. The secondary outcome was the optimal length of the catheter in the vein to maximize survival. Additional intravenous-related endpoints included first-stick success, time to insertion, number of attempts, thrombosis, and infection. Results: Between October 2018 and March 2019, 257 patients were randomized, with 126 in the standard long ultrasonographically guided intravenous peripheral catheter group and 131 in the ultralong group. Kaplan-Meier estimate of catheter median survival time in the ultralong group was 136 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] 116 to 311 hours) compared with 92 hours (95% CI 71 to 120 hours) in the standard long group, for a difference of 44 hours (95% CI 2 to 218 hours). The optimal catheter length in the vein was 2.75 cm, and intravenous lines with greater than 2.75 cm inserted had a median survival of 129 hours (95% CI 102 to 202 hours) compared with 75 hours (95% CI 52 to 116 hours) for intravenous lines with less than or equal to 2.75 cm, for a difference of 54 hours (95% CI 10 to 134 hours). Insertion characteristics were similar between the groups: 74.1% versus 79.4% first-stick success (95% CI for the difference-2% to 5%), 1.4 versus 1.3 for number of attempts (95% CI for the difference-0.1 to 0.3), and 6.9 versus 5.9 minutes to completion (95% CI for the difference-1.3 to 3.4) with ultralong versus standard long, respectively. There were no cases of infection or thrombosis. Conclusion: This study demonstrated increased catheter survival when the ultralong compared with the standard long ultrasonographically guided intravenous peripheral catheter was used, whereas insertion characteristics and safety appeared similar. [

No abstract