Sexually dimorphic nociception and opioid antinociception is very pervasive but poorly understood. We had demonstrated that spinal morphine antinociception in females, but not males, requires the concomitant activation of spinal μ-and κ-opioid receptors (MOR and KOR, respectively). This finding suggests an interrelationship between MOR and KOR in females that is not manifest in males. Here, we show that expression of a MOR/KOR heterodimer is vastly more prevalent in the spinal cord of proestrous vs. diestrous females and vs. males. Cross-linking experiments in combination with in vivo pharmacological analyses indicate that heterodimeric MOR/KOR utilizes spinal dynorphin 1-17 as a substrate and is likely to be the molecular transducer for the female-specific KOR component of spinal morphine antinociception. The activation of KOR within the heterodimeric MOR/KOR provides a mechanism for recruiting spinal KOR-mediated antinociception without activating the concomitant pronociceptive functions that monomeric KOR also subserves. Spinal cord MOR/KOR heterodimers represent a unique pharmacological target for female-specific pain control.estrous cycle | sexual dimorphism | sex steroids | signaling complexes | estrogen and progesterone S exual dimorphism in nociception and opioid antinociception has been extensively documented in humans (1-4) and laboratory animals (5-9). Nevertheless, underlying molecular mechanisms causally associated with sex-dependent nociception and opioid antinociception remain enigmatic. For example, there is little mechanistic understanding of why women are more likely than men to experience myriad chronic pain syndromes (1-3) as well as recurrent pain, more severe levels of pain, and pain of longer duration (10). Similarly, reports of more robust κ-opioid receptor (KOR) antinociception in females vs. males (11)(12)(13)(14) are not accompanied by compelling mechanistic rationales.In addition to proposed genetic contributions (15), the milieu of ovarian sex steroids is thought to contribute to sex-dependent nociception (5, 6) and opioid antinociception (5, 16). However, sex steroid molecular targets and their altered functionality that are relevant to sex-dependent nociception and opioid antinociception are not defined. This laboratory reported (17) that the antinociception produced by intrathecal (i.t.) morphine results from the sex-based differential recruitment of spinal analgesic components. In males, spinal morphine antinociception results from the exclusive activation of spinal μ-opioid receptor (MOR). In contrast, in females, spinal morphine antinociception requires the concomitant activation of spinal MOR and KOR (17). The most parsimonious explanation for this sex-dependent dichotomy would be the female-specific recruitment of spinal MOR/KOR heterodimers.We investigated the hypothesized sexually dimorphic expression in spinal cord of MOR/KOR heterodimers by comparing their presence in the spinal cord of male, proestrous and diestrous rats as well as rats subjected to ovariectomy. Here, ...

We previously demonstrated that the spinal cord κ-opioid receptor (KOR) and μ-opioid receptor (MOR) form heterodimers (KOR/MOR). KOR/MOR formation and the associated KOR dependency of spinal morphine antinociception are most robust during proestrus. Using Sprague Dawley rats, we now demonstrate that (1) spinal synthesis of estrogen is critical to these processes, and (2) blockade of either estrogen receptor (ER) α-, β-, or G-protein-coupled ER1 or progesterone receptor (PR) substantially reduces KOR/MOR and eliminates mediation by KOR of spinal morphine antinociception. Effects of blocking ERs were manifest within 15 min, whereas those of PR blockade were manifest after 18 h, indicating the requirement for rapid signaling by estrogen and transcriptional effects of progesterone. Individual or combined blockade of ERs produced the same magnitude of effect, suggesting that they work in tandem as part of a macromolecular complex to regulate KOR/MOR formation. Consistent with this inference, we found that KOR and MOR were coexpressed with ERα and G-protein-coupled ER1 in the spinal dorsal horn. Reduction of KOR/MOR by ER or PR blockade or spinal aromatase inhibition shifts spinal morphine antinociception from KOR dependent to KOR independent. This indicates a sex steroid-dependent plasticity of spinal KOR functionality, which could explain the greater analgesic potency of KOR agonists in women versus men. We suggest that KOR/MOR is a molecular switch that shifts the function of KOR and thereby endogenous dynorphin from pronociceptive to antinociceptive. KOR/MOR could thus serve as a novel molecular target for pain management in women.

Simulation of the pregnancy blood concentration profile of 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) and progesterone (P) in nonpregnant ovariectomized rats has been shown to result in a significant elevation of nociceptive response thresholds. The present report demonstrates that spinal opioid antinociceptive responsiveness to these ovarian steroids is not sex-specific. Treatment of orchidectomized sexually mature males with an analogous regimen of E(2) and P also elicits an antinociception, the robustness and temporal profile of which is comparable with that previously observed in females. Neither E(2) nor P, alone, is sufficient to produce antinociception in male rats, as was previously demonstrated in females. Neurobiological substrates and antinociceptive mechanisms underlying ovarian sex steroid antinociception do, however, exhibit sex specificity. In males, the analgesia resulting from ovarian steroid treatment derives from the independent contributions of spinal kappa and mu, not delta, opioid receptor pathways that are additive, not synergistic. Spinal alpha(2)-noradrenergic receptor activity and its attendant analgesic synergy with spinal opioid systems do not contribute to ovarian sex steroid analgesia in males. This is in contrast to the previous demonstrations that ovarian sex steroid-induced antinociception in females results from antinociceptive synergy between activated spinal kappa/delta opioid as well as alpha(2)-noradrenergic receptor systems. The current data reveal that ovarian steroid-activated multiplicative spinal antinociceptive pathways that had been demonstrated in female rats are not manifest in their male counterparts.

Current evidence for sex-based nociception and antinociception, largely confined to behavioral measures of pain sensitivity, chronic pain syndromes, and analgesic efficacy, provides little mechanistic insights into biological substrates causally associated with sexual dimorphic pain experience. Spinal cord has been shown to be a central nervous system region in which regulation of opioid antinociceptive substrates manifest sexual dimorphism. This site was therefore chosen to explore whether or not differential mechanisms underlie comparable spinal opioid antinociception in male and female rodents. Intrathecal (i.t.) application of morphine to male and female rats produces a thermal antinociception equivalent in magnitude and temporal profile. Nevertheless, it results from the sex-based differential recruitment of spinal analgesic components. As expected, the spinal -opioid receptor is critical for i.t. morphine antinociception in both sexes. However, in females, but not males, activation by i.t. morphine of spinal -opioid receptors is a prerequisite for spinal morphine antinociception. Furthermore, in females, but not males, i.t. application of antidynorphin antibodies substantially attenuates the antinociception produced by i.t. morphine. This indicates that the antinociception that results from the i.t. application of morphine in females requires the functional recruitment of spinal dynorphin. Female-specific recruitment by i.t. morphine of a spinal dynorphin/-opioid receptor pathway results from organizational consequences of ovarian sex steroids and not the absence of testicular hormones. These observations suggest that sexual dimorphic pain and analgesic mechanisms might be far more pervasive than commonly thought and underscore the imperative for including female as well as male subjects in all studies of pain and antinociception.Sexual dimorphism in nociception and opioid antinociception has been well documented in humans (Ellermeier and Westphal, 1995;Unruh, 1996;Berkley, 1997;Fillingim et al., 1998;Walker and Carmody, 1998) and laboratory animals (Mogil et al., 1993;Coyle et al., 1995Coyle et al., , 1996Kayser et al., 1996;Mogil and Chanda, 2005). Previously, evidence for sexbased nociception and antinociception has been largely confined to behavioral measures revealing differential pain sensitivity, frequency and severity of chronic pain syndromes, and divergent analgesic efficacy of opioid receptor-type-selective agonists. Although underscoring the occurrence of sexual dimorphism in pain processing and its regulation, these studies provide little insight into biological substrates and neuronal organizational parameters that might underlie such sexual dimorphism.The spinal cord has been shown to be a central nervous system region in which components of opioid analgesic pathways and their regulation manifest sexual dimorphism. For example, the density of the -opioid receptor (KOR) and its distribution within axon terminals differs between the spinal cord of male and female rodents (Harris et al....

Estrogens have a multitude of effects on opioid systems and are thought to play a key role in sexually dimorphic nociception and opioid antinociception. Heretofore, classical genomic actions of estrogens are largely thought to be responsible for the effects of these steroids on nociception and opioid antinociception. The recent discovery that estrogens can also activate estrogen receptors that are located in the plasma membrane, the effects of which are manifest in seconds to minutes instead of hours to days has revolutionized our thinking concerning the ways in which estrogens are likely to modulate pain responsiveness and the dynamic nature of that modulation. This review summarizes parameters of opioid functionality and nociception that are subject to modulation by estrogens, underscoring the added dimensions of such modulation that accrues from rapid membrane estrogen receptor signaling. Implications of this mode of signaling regarding putative sources of estrogens and its degradation are also discussed.

The gene encoding the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) generates a remarkable diversity of subtypes, the functional significance of which remains largely unknown. The structure of MOR could be a critical determinant of MOR functionality and its adaptations to chronic morphine exposure. Since MOR antinociception has sexually dimorphic dimensions, we determined the influence of sex, stage of estrus cycle and chronic systemic morphine on levels of MOR splice variant mRNA in rat spinal cord. Chronic systemic morphine influenced the spinal expression of mRNA encoding rMOR-1B2 and rMOR-1C1 in a profoundly sex-dependent fashion. In males, chronic morphine resulted in a 2-fold increase in expression levels of rMOR-1B2 and rMOR-1C1 mRNA. This effect of chronic morphine was completely absent in females. Increased density of MOR protein in spinal cord of males accompanied the chronic morphine-induced increase in MOR variant mRNA, suggesting that it reflected an increase in corresponding receptor protein. These results suggest that tolerance/dependence results, at least in part, from different adaptational strategies in males and females. The signaling consequences of the unique composition of the C-terminus tip of rMOR-1C1 and rMOR-1B2 could point the way to defining the molecular components of sex-dependent tolerance and withdrawal mechanisms.

We previously showed that intrathecal application of endomorphin 2 [EM2; the highly specific endogenous μ-opioid receptor (MOR) ligand] induces antinociception that varies with stage of the rat estrous cycle: minimal during diestrus and prominent during proestrus. Earlier studies, however, did not identify proestrus-activated signaling strategies that enable spinal EM2 antinociception. We now report that in female rats, increased spinal dynorphin release and κ-opioid receptor (KOR) signaling, as well as the emergence of glutamate-activated metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR) signaling, are critical to the transition from an EM2 nonresponsive state (during diestrus) to an analgesically responsive state (during proestrus). Differential signaling by mGluR, depending on its activation by membrane estrogen receptor α (mERα; during diestrus) versus glutamate (during proestrus), concomitant with the ebb and flow of spinal dynorphin/KOR signaling, functions as a switch, preventing or promoting, respectively, spinal EM2 antinociception. Importantly, EM2 and glutamate-containing varicosities appose spinal neurons that express MOR along with mGluRs and mERα, suggesting that signaling mechanisms regulating analgesic effectiveness of intrathecally applied EM2 also pertain to endogenous EM2. Regulation of spinal EM2 antinociception by both the nature of the endogenous mGluR activator (i.e., endogenous biased agonism at mGluR) and changes in spinal dynorphin/KOR signaling represent a novel mechanism for modulating analgesic responsiveness to endogenous EM2 (and perhaps other opioids). This points the way for developing noncanonical pharmacological approaches to pain management by harnessing endogenous opioids for pain relief. The current prescription opioid abuse epidemic underscores the urgency to develop alternative pharmacotherapies for managing pain. We find that the magnitude of spinal endomorphin 2 (EM2) antinociception not only varies with stage of reproductive cycle, but is also differentially regulated during diestrus and proestrus. This finding highlights the need for sex-specific and cycle-specific approaches to pain management. Additionally, our finding that spinal EM2 antinociception in female rats is regulated by both the ebb and flow of spinal dynorphin/κ-opioid receptor signaling over the estrous cycle, as well as the nature of the endogenous mGluR activator, could encourage noncanonical pharmacological approaches to pain management, such as harnessing endogenous opioids for pain relief.

Endomorphin 2 (EM2) is the predominant endogenous mu-opioid receptor (MOR) ligand in the spinal cord. Given its endogenous presence, antinociceptive responsiveness to the intrathecal application of EM2 most likely reflects its ability to modulate nociception when released in situ. In order to explore the physiological pliability of sex-dependent differences in spinal MOR-mediated antinociception, we investigated the antinociception produced by intrathecal EM2 in male, proestrus female, and diestrus female rats. Antinociception was reflected by changes in tail flick latency to radiant heat. In females, the spinal EM2 antinociceptive system oscillated between analgesically active and inactive states. During diestrus, when circulating estrogens are low, spinal EM2 antinociceptive responsiveness was minimal. In contrast, during proestrus, when circulating estrogens are high, spinal EM2 antinociception was robust and comparable in magnitude to that manifest by males. Furthermore, in proestrus females, spinal EM2 antinociception required spinal dynorphin and kappaopioid receptor activation, concomitant with MOR activation. This is required for neither spinal EM2 antinociception in males nor the antinociception elicited in proestrus females by spinal sufentanil or [d-Ala2,N-methyl-Phe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin, which are prototypic MOR-selective nonpeptide and peptide agonists, respectively. These results reveal that spinal EM2 antinociception and the signaling mechanisms used to produce it fundamentally differ in males and females. Perspective The inability to mount spinal EM2 antinociception during defined stages of the estrus (and presumably menstrual) cycle and impaired transition from spinal EM2 analgesically nonresponsive to responsive physiological states could be causally associated with the well-documented greater severity and frequency of chronic intractable pain syndromes in women vs men.