BackgroundMyocardial T1-mapping recently emerged as a promising quantitative method for non-invasive tissue characterization in numerous cardiomyopathies. Commonly performed with an inversion-recovery (IR) magnetization preparation at 1.5T, the application at 3T has gained due to increased quantification precision. Alternatively, saturation-recovery (SR) T1-mapping has recently been introduced at 1.5T for improved accuracy.Thus, the purpose of this study is to investigate the robustness and precision of SR T1-mapping at 3T and to establish accurate reference values for native T1-times and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) of healthy myocardium.MethodsBalanced Steady-State Free-Precession (bSSFP) Saturation-Pulse Prepared Heart-rate independent Inversion-REcovery (SAPPHIRE) and Saturation-recovery Single-SHot Acquisition (SASHA) T1-mapping were compared with the Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence at 3T. Accuracy and precision were studied in phantom. Native and post-contrast T1-times and regional ECV were determined in 20 healthy subjects (10 men, 27 ± 5 years). Subjective image quality, susceptibility artifact rating, in-vivo precision and reproducibility were analyzed.ResultsSR T1-mapping showed <4 % deviation from the spin-echo reference in phantom in the range of T1 = 100–2300 ms. The average quality and artifact scores of the T1-mapping methods were: MOLLI:3.4/3.6, SAPPHIRE:3.1/3.4, SASHA:2.9/3.2; (1: poor - 4: excellent/1: strong - 4: none). SAPPHIRE and SASHA yielded significantly higher T1-times (SAPPHIRE: 1578 ± 42 ms, SASHA: 1523 ± 46 ms), in-vivo T1-time variation (SAPPHIRE: 60.1 ± 8.7 ms, SASHA: 70.0 ± 9.3 ms) and lower ECV-values (SAPPHIRE: 0.20 ± 0.02, SASHA: 0.21 ± 0.03) compared with MOLLI (T1: 1181 ± 47 ms, ECV: 0.26 ± 0.03, Precision: 53.7 ± 8.1 ms). No significant difference was found in the inter-subject variability of T1-times or ECV-values (T1: p = 0.90, ECV: p = 0.78), the observer agreement (inter: p > 0.19; intra: p > 0.09) or consistency (inter: p > 0.07; intra: p > 0.17) between the three methods.ConclusionsSaturation-recovery T1-mapping at 3T yields higher accuracy, comparable inter-subject, inter- and intra-observer variability and less than 30 % precision-loss compared to MOLLI.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0302-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Myocardial T1-mapping, a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging technique, facilitates a quantitative measure of fibrosis which is linked to numerous cardiovascular symptoms. To overcome the problems of common techniques, including lack of accuracy and robustness against partial-voluming and heart-rate variability, we introduce a systolic saturation-recovery T1-mapping method. The Saturation-Pulse Prepared Heart-rate independent Inversion-Recovery (SAPPHIRE) T1-mapping method was modified to enable imaging during systole. Phantom measurements were used to evaluate the insensitivity of systolic T1-mapping towards heart-rate variability. In-vivo feasibility and accuracy were demonstrated in ten healthy volunteers with native and post-contrast T1-mappping during systole and diastole. To show benefits in the presence of RR-variability, six arrhythmic patients underwent native T1-mapping. Resulting systolic SAPPHIRE T1-values showed no dependence on arrhythmia in phantom (CoV < 1%). In-vivo, significantly lower T1 (1563 ± 56 ms, precision: 84.8 ms) and ECV-values (0.20 ± 0.03) than during diastole (T1 = 1580 ± 62 ms, p = 0.0124; precision: 60.2 ms, p = 0.03; ECV = 0.21 ± 0.03, p = 0.0098) were measured, with a strong correlation of systolic and diastolic T1 (r = 0.89). In patients, mis-triggering-induced motion caused significant imaging artifacts in diastolic T1-maps, whereas systolic T1-maps displayed resilience to arrythmia. In conclusion, the proposed method enables saturation-recovery T1-mapping during systole, providing increased robustness against partial-voluming compared to diastolic imaging, for the benefit of T1-measurements in arrhythmic patients.