Trauma-informed care is a service provision model used across a range of practice settings. Drawing on an extensive body of research on trauma (broadly defined as experiences that produce enduring emotional pain and distress) and health outcomes, we have argued that the principles of trauma-informed care can be extended to social policy. Citing a variety of health-related policy examples, we have described how policy can better reflect 6 core principles of trauma-informed care: safety, trustworthiness and transparency, collaboration, empowerment, choice, and intersectionality. This framework conveys a politicized understanding of trauma, reflecting the reality that trauma and its effects are not equally distributed, and offers a pathway for public health professionals to disrupt trauma-driven health disparities through policy action.

This article examines domestic violence among women who participate in microfinance in Bangladesh. Secondary analysis of survey data from nationally representative Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey was used to investigate the association between microfinance participation and domestic violence of 4,163 ever-married women between the ages of 18 and 49 years. Outcome measure is experience of domestic violence as measured by a modified Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) and predictor variables include microfinance, binary indicator of relatively better economic status, autonomy, decision-making power, and demographic variables. The likelihood of experiencing domestic violence was not found to vary with microfinance participation. However, the interaction effect of microfinance and better economic status was found to be significantly associated with domestic violence (9% increased probability). Experience of domestic violence was negatively associated with older age, higher education of the husband, and autonomy. In Bangladesh, microfinance participation may be associated with a higher probability of experiencing domestic violence for women with relatively better economic status, but not for the poorest of the poor.

Background: African refugee women in the United States are at risk of poor reproductive health outcomes; however, examination of reproductive health outcomes in this population remains inadequate. We compared:(1) prepregnancy health and prenatal behavior; (2) prenatal history and prenatal care utilization; and (3) labor and birth outcomes between African refugee women and U.S.-born Black and White women. Methods: A secondary data analysis of enhanced electronic birth certificate data was used. Univariate comparisons using chi-squared tests for dichotomous variables and analysis of variance and/or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables were conducted for Refugee versus Black versus White women. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: From 2007 to 2016, 789 African refugee, 17,487 Black, and 59,615 White women in our population gave birth. African refugees experienced more favorable health outcomes than U.S.-born groups on variables examined. Compared to U.S.-born women, African refugee women had fewer prepregnancy health risks ( p < 0.001), fewer preterm births ( p < 0.001), fewer low birth weight infants ( p < 0.001), and higher rates of vaginal deliveries ( p < 0.001). These favorable outcomes occurred despite later initiation of prenatal care ( p < 0.001) and lower scores of prenatal care adequacy among refugee women compared to U.S.-born groups ( p < 0.001). Conclusions:The healthy immigrant effect appears to extend to reproductive health outcomes in our studied population of African refugee women. However, based on our data, targeted, culturally-congruent education surrounding family planning and prenatal care is recommended. Insight from reproductive health care experiences of African refugee women can provide understanding of the protective factors contributing to the healthy immigrant effect in reproductive health outcomes, and knowledge gained can be utilized to improve outcomes in other at-risk groups.

Using empowerment theory, the current study examines antecedents of lifetime experience of intimate partner violence, intimate partner violence experienced in the last 12 months, emotional violence, and husbands' controlling behaviors toward their wives in Pakistan. Using data from a subsample of 658 women from the nationally representative Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2012-2013, this study examined whether empowerment variables, such as household decision-making power, economic decision-making power, and adherence to patriarchy, operationalized as justification of wife beating, contribute to intimate partner violence using logistic regression analyses. Results indicate that adherence to patriarchal norms, household decision-making power, and higher education was found to be associated with lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence. Adherence to patriarchal norms, economic decision-making power, and higher education was found significantly associated with intimate partner violence in the past 12 months. Adherence to patriarchal norms was significantly associated with experiencing emotional violence as well as controlling behaviors by husbands. In conclusion, women's adherence to patriarchal norms is a reflection of the patriarchal society in which they live; indeed, this was found to be the most important predictor of women's experience of intimate partner violence, when different types of violence were assessed. Implications for social work practice are discussed.

No abstract