This article seeks to expand the kinds of questions we ask about the diverse militarized campaigns referred to collectively as the “war on terror,” the grassroots resistance to these wars, and efforts committed to creating a world without destruction and killing. Shifting the focus of this feminist critique of war away from the center of power (the empire) to the everyday lives of feminist and queer activists living the war on terror from the ground up, this article examines a distinct feminist and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) social movement that worked to respond to and resist the US-backed Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006. We argue along with our interlocutors in Lebanon that asymmetrical systems of gender, class, race, ethnicity, sexuality, and family are entangled in the historical conditions of transnational capital, empire, and war, and necessitate an intersectional approach that refuses to impose false binaries or hierarchies on a complex social reality. We conclude by arguing the importance of reframing the war on terror and reimagining feminist and LGBTQ policies as a critique of the post-racial discourse, beyond dominant imperialist and nationalist discourses, which are exclusionary, sexist, and homophobic in different ways.

The RAPD-PCR technique was used to study genetic variation within and among geographical populations of the Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say), from Morocco and Syria, associated with the fly's ability to overcome resistance in three wheat cultivars containing H5, H13 and H22 resistance genes. Variation was detected both for the level of susceptibility of the cultivars and RAPD profiles of M. destructor populations. By the use of RAPD-PCR, high genetic variability was detected among individuals and populations of M. destructor within and between areas separated geographically. The DNA fingerprints of populations of M. destructor were area-specific with Nei's measures of genetic distance ranging from 0.156 (between Abda and Beni Mellal, Morocco) to 1.977 (between Marchouch, Morocco and Lattakia, Syria). Cluster analysis of the genetic distances among the populations, identified the Syrian population as an outlier. A highly significant correlation (r = 0.81) observed between the genetic and geographic distances among the populations, provided genetic support for dispersal of the fly from its presumed origin in West Asia to Morocco.

Hessian fly, Mayetiola destructor (Say), is the most important insect pest of wheat in Morocco, where host plant resistance has been used successfully for control. Our objective was to determine the frequency of Hessian fly virulence on H5, H13 and H22 resistance genes. Five Hessian fly populations from the principal cereal-growing regions in Morocco were studied. The variability in percentage of susceptible plants across Hessian fly populations was highly significant (P < 0.01), indicating differences in virulence frequencies. Plants with the H13 gene had the lowest percentage of susceptible plants, 1.77 and 1.51%, when infested with Hessian flies from Fes and Marchouch, respectively. A low level of virulence to H22 was detected in Fes, Abda and Marchouch populations, 1.87, 1.54 and 1.99% susceptible plants, respectively. The level of virulence to H5 was low in all the five populations. The Beni Mellal population gave the highest percentage of susceptible plants carrying H13 and H22 genes, 6.43 and 7.28%, respectively. The size of live larvae on susceptible plants of the three cultivars carrying H5, H13 and H22 was similar to that of the susceptible check, indicating that a true virulence (biotype) is developing in Hessian fly populations in Morocco. Thus, continuous monitoring of the development of Hessian fly biotypes is essential for optimal deployment of resistance genes.

Focusing on Arab diasporic engagements with the structures of Zionist and US imperial war within the United States, this essay calls for collapsing spatiotemporal distinctions between the Middle East and the United States in Middle East studies, American studies, and Arab American studies. The author reflects on the significance of imperialism and white supremacy to the experience of living a US and Israeli-led military invasion from the distance of the diaspora and to the criminalization of constitutionally protected political speech in support of Palestinian rights. In such cases, she argues, white supremacy conflates Arabness and Islam with “terrorism” transnationally, and the empire and the diaspora coconstitute each other as moving parts of the same imperial present.

No abstract