During floods, the riparian vegetation in a watercourse significantly changes the velocity distribution and the turbulence structures of the flow. However, a certain influence on them is always exerted by the bed sediments. The aim of the present work is to study the bed roughness effects on the turbulence characteristics in an open-channel flow with rigid and emergent vegetation. Toward this end, an experimental campaign was conducted and consisted of three runs with different bed roughness conditions. The study is based on the analysis of the velocity, Reynolds shear stress, and viscous stress distributions. The results show that, in the region below the free surface region, the flow is strongly influenced by the vegetation. However, moving toward the bed, the flow is affected by a combined effect of vegetation, firstly, and bed roughness, secondly. This flow zone becomes more extended, as the size of the bed sediments increases. The shear stress distributions confirm the distinction between the two flow regions. In fact, the shear stresses are practically negligible in the upper zone of the water depth influenced by vegetation, whereas, owing to the bed roughness, they reach the maximum value near the bed surface. Finally, the analysis of the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) revealed high values below the crest level and in the near-bed flow zone in the streamwise direction, whereas a strong lateral variation of TKE from the flume centerline to the cylinder occurred in the intermediate region.

The turbulence characteristics within flows over water-worked gravel beds (WGBs) and screeded gravel beds (SGBs) were examined by measuring the instantaneous flow velocity field using a two-dimensional particle image velocimetry system. To compare the responses of a WGB and an SGB to velocity and various turbulence characteristics, the flow Froude number was kept identical for both the beds that remained immobile. The roughness structures of both the beds were measured using a laser scanner. The results showed that the bed surface roughness was higher in the WGB than in the SGB. However, the longest axis of the gravels of WGBs was oriented streamwise owing to the action of water work, but the gravels of SGBs were randomly poised. The distribution of bed roughness fluctuations was negatively skewed in the WGB and positively skewed in the SGB. Double averaging methodology was applied to analyze the flow parameters. In this paper, the vertical profiles of the double-averaged streamwise velocity and the turbulence parameters, specifically the spatially averaged (SA) Reynolds shear and normal stresses, form-induced shear and normal stresses, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) and form-induced TKE fluxes, quadrant analysis of SA Reynolds shear stress, etc., are presented and analyzed critically by focusing on comparisons between a WGB and an SGB. A comparative study reveals that in the near-bed flow zone, the SGB underestimates the turbulence parameters compared to the WGB. Therefore, in order to represent the prototypical flow in laboratory, the experiments should be performed in a WGB.

Despite the existing knowledge concerning the hydrodynamic processes at river junctions, there is still a lack of information regarding the particular case of low width and discharge ratios, which are the typical conditions of mountain river confluences. Aiming at filling this gap, laboratory and numerical experiments were conducted, comparing the results with literature findings. Ten different confluences from 45 • to 90 • were simulated to study the effects of the junction angle on the flow structure, using a numerical code that solves the 3D Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with the k-turbulence closure model. The results showed that the higher the junction angle, the wider and longer the retardation zone at the upstream junction corner and the separation zone, and the greater the flow deflection at the entrance of the tributary into the post-confluence channel. Furthermore, it was shown that the maximum streamwise velocity does not necessarily increase with the junction angle and that it is not always located in the contraction section.

No abstract

No abstract