No abstract

These data suggest that the combination of MRT+GMIMPR might be better than MRT only for unifocal CNS tumors, particularly in infants and young children.

The central nervous system of vertebrates, even when immature, displays extraordinary resistance to damage by microscopically narrow, multiple, parallel, planar beams of x rays. Imminently lethal gliosarcomas in the brains of mature rats can be inhibited and ablated by such microbeams with little of no harm to mature brain tissues and neurological function. Potentially palliative, conventional wide-beam radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors in human infants under three years of age is so fraught with the danger of disrupting the functional maturation of immature brain tissues around the targeted tumor that it is implemented infrequently. Other kinds of therapy for such tumors are often inadequate. We suggest that microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) might help to alleviate the situation. Wiggler-generated synchrotron x rays were first used for experimental microplanar beam (microbeam) radiation therapy (MRT) at Brookhaven National Laboratory's National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) in the early 1990s. We now describe the progress achieved in MRT research to date using immature and adult rats irradiated at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) in Grenoble, France, and investigated thereafter at the Institute ofPathology ofthe University of Bern.

Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a currently experimental method of radiotherapy which is mediated by an array of parallel microbeams of synchrotron-wiggler-generated x-rays. Suitably selected, nominally supralethal doses of x-rays delivered to parallel microslices of tumor-bearing tissues in rats can be either palliative or curative while causing little or no serious damage to contiguous normal tissues. Although the pathogenesis of MRT-mediated tumor regression is not understood, as in all radiotherapy such understanding will be based ultimately on our understanding of the relationships among the following three factors: (1) microdosimetry, (2) damage to normal tissues, and (3) therapeutic efficacy. Although physical microdosimetry is feasible, published information on MRT microdosimetry to date is computational. This report describes Monte Carlo-based computational MRT microdosimetry using photon and/or electron scattering and photoionization cross-section data in the 1 eV through 100 GeV range distributed publicly by the U.S. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in the 1990s. These are compared with Monte Carlo-based microdosimetric computations using a code and physical data available in the 1980s. With the aim of using the PSI-version of GEANT Monte Carlo code for future macro- and micro/nano-dosimetric studies of Microbeam Radiation Therapy (MRT) a comparison of this code is made with the INHOM(EGS4) (version 1990), Dilmanian-CPE and Persliden-CPE Monte Carlo photon-electron codes (both version 1990) with which the absorbed dose distributions were calculated in 1990 and 1991 considering, (a) a single cylindrical microbeam, (b) multiple cylindrical microbeams in an orthogonal square bundle, and (c) multiple planar microbeams. It is shown that the PSI-version of GEANT can potentially deliver more accurate results (a) using presently the most advanced atomic data, and especially (b) employing "Single-collision" electron transport instead of only the "Condensed-history" electron transport as in code INHOM(EGS4). In contrast Dilmanian-CPE and Persliden-CPE codes deposit the electron energy locally instead of transporting it to the correct position.