After severe brain trauma, blood-brain barrier disruption and alteration of cerebral arteriolar vasoreactive properties may modify the cerebral response to catecholamines. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to compare the effects of dopamine and norepinephrine in a model of brain injury that consisted of a weight-drop model of injury complicated by a 15-min hypoxic-hypotensive insult (HH). Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 7 in each group) received, after brain injury, an infusion of either norepinephrine (TNE group) or dopamine (TDA group) in order to increase cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) above 70 mm Hg. In addition, a control group (C group, no trauma) and a trauma group (T group, brain injury, no catecholamine infusion) were studied. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), intracranial pressure (ICP, intraparenchymal fiberoptic device), and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF, extradural laser-Doppler fiber) were measured throughout the protocol. In T group, brain injury and HH induced a decrease in CPP (by an increase of ICP and a decrease of MAP), and a decrease of LCBF. Both norepinephrine and dopamine failed to increase CPP, and ICP was significantly higher in TNE and TDA groups than in T group. Interestingly, norepinephrine was not able to alleviate the decrease in MAP. Neither norepinephrine or dopamine could induce an increase of MAP. LCBF decreased similarly in T, TNE and TDA groups. In conclusion, norepinephrine and dopamine are not able to restore values of CPP above 70 mm Hg in a model of severe brain trauma. Furthermore, their systemic vasopressor properties are altered.
We investigated the spatiotemporal GFAP mRNA expression over a period of 11 days following brain injury in rats caused by impact acceleration, which is known to produce diffuse axonal injury (DAI). We observed widespread GFAP mRNA expression throughout the brain, which was more rapid and intense in the hippocampus. This expression was obvious in most animals 2 days after injury and appeared maximal at day 6. Although it decreased by day 11, the level of expression remained high compared with control levels. We noted slight differences in time of onset and the magnitude of the response between hippocampus and white matter structures or cortical areas. The different mechanisms able to trigger this response are discussed in regard to histopathological changes observed in DAI models.
Intraspinal implantation of a collagen guidance channel (CGC) to promote axon regeneration was investigated in marmosets with brachial plexus injury. After avulsion of the right C5, C6 and C7 spinal roots, a CGC containing (group B) or not (group A) a nerve segment, or a nerve graft (group C), was ventro-laterally implanted into the cord to bridge the ventral horn and the avulsed C6 roots. No spinal cord dysfunction was observed following surgery. Two months later, the postoperative flaccid paralysis of the lesioned arm improved. In five months, a normal electromyogram of the affected biceps muscle was recorded in all repaired animals. Motor evoked potentials were obtained with a mean amplitude of 13.37 +/- 13.66 microV in group A, 13.21 +/- 5.16 microV in group B and 37.14 +/- 35.16 microV in group C. The force of biceps muscle contraction was 27.33 +/- 20.03 g (group A), 24.33 +/- 17.03 g (group B) and 37.38 +/- 21.70 g (group C). Retrograde tracing by horseradish peroxidase showed labelled motoneurons ipsilaterally located in the C5 and C6 ventral horn, nearby the implantation site. The mean labelled neurons was 32.33 +/- 21.13, 219.33 +/- 176.29 and 64.33 +/- 23.54 in group A, B and C respectively. Histological analysis presented numerous myelinated and unmyelinated regenerating axons in the implant of these animals. Statistical analysis did not show significant difference among the three repaired groups. Our results indicate that spinal neurons can regenerate through a CGC to avulsed nerve roots and induce motor recovery in primates.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.