The optimal management of hematologic malignancy-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia is unclear. This is a retrospective study of 128 adult patients with hematologic malignancies who were diagnosed with VTE. The outcome of patients with significant thrombocytopenia (≤50,000/µL) was compared with those without. Forty-seven patients (36.7%) had a platelet count ≤50,000/µL during a period of time of perceived need for new or continued anticoagulation. The median nadir platelet count in those with significant thrombocytopenia was 10,000/µL (range 2,000-45,000/µL) versus 165,000/µL (50,000-429,000/µL) in those without (P < 0.001). The median duration of significant thrombocytopenia in the first group was 10 days (1-35 days). Therapy during the period of significant thrombocytopenia included prophylactic-dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (47%), therapeutic-dose LMWH or heparin (30%), warfarin (2%), inferior vena cava filter (2%), and observation (17%). Patients without thrombocytopenia were managed with the standard of care therapy. At a median follow-up of more than 2 years, the risk of clinically significant bleeding (11% vs 6%, P = 0.22) including major bleeding (6% vs 2%) and clot progression or recurrence (21% vs 22%, P = 1.00) were similar in patients with or without significant thrombocytopenia. In a multivariate analysis, the risk of recurrence/progression (hazard ratio, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.21-1.66, P = 0.31) and hemorrhage rate (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.05-1.56, P = 0.15) did not differ based on the presence of significant thrombocytopenia. Within the limits of this retrospective study, cautious use of prophylactic-dose LMWH may be safe in thrombocytopenic patients with hematologic malignancy-associated VTE. Am. J. Hematol. 91:E468-E472, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Objectives: Malignant hypertension can cause thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) and the overall presentation may mimic thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). This presents a dilemma of whether or not to initiate plasma exchange. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical and laboratory manifestations of malignant hypertension-induced TMA, and its outcomes. Methods: Using several search terms, we reviewed English language articles on malignant hypertension-induced TMA, indexed in MEDLINE by 31 December 2013. We also report a new case. All these cases were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 19 patients, with 10 males, had a median age of 38 years at diagnosis; 58% had a history of hypertension. Mean arterial pressure at presentation was 159 mmHg (range 123-190 mmHg). All had prominent renal dysfunction (mean creatinine of 5.2 mg/dl, range 1.7-13 mg/dl) but relatively modest thrombocytopenia (mean platelet count of 60 × 103/µl, range 12-131 × 10 3 /µl). Reported cases (n = 9) mostly had preserved ADAMTS-13 activity (mean 64%, range 18-96%). Following blood pressure control, the majority had improvement in presenting symptoms (100%) and platelet counts (84%); however, only 58% had significant improvement in creatinine. More than half (53%) needed hemodialysis. One patient died of cardiac arrest during pacemaker insertion. Conclusion: Prior history of hypertension, high mean arterial pressure, significant renal impairment but relatively modest thrombocytopenia and lack of severe ADAMTS-13 deficiency (activity <10%) at diagnosis are clues to diagnose malignant hypertension-induced TMA. Patients with malignant hypertension respond well to antihypertensive agents and have favorable nonrenal outcomes.

Background: Although adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer improves overall survival, prior studies have shown that it is underused. We analyzed different factors that may influence its use. Methods: This is a retrospective study of stage III colon cancer patients (n = 207,718)

Background: Pancreatic cancer accounts for approximately 7% of all cancer deaths. More than half of all pancreatic cancers are stage IV at diagnosis, where systemic chemotherapy is used with the goal of life prolongation as well as palliation. The patient characteristics and health system factors that drive the use of systemic therapy are unknown. Method: This is a retrospective study of stage IV pancreatic cancer patients (n = 140,210) diagnosed between 2000 and 2011 in the NCDB. NCDB contains approximately 70% of new cancer diagnosis from more than 1500 accredited cancer programs in the United States and Puerto Rico. Chi-squared test was used to determine any differences in characteristics of patients who did or did not receive systemic therapy. Results: Our study demonstrated that only 49.1% of stage IV pancreatic cancer patients received systemic therapy. The use of systemic therapy is significantly lower in female, African American/Hispanic, patients older than 40 years, those without insurance or with Medicare and Medicaid, higher Charlson Comorbidity Score, poor economic and educational status and in nonacademic centers. Conclusions: This is the largest study to evaluate the determinants of systemic therapy use in stage IV pancreatic cancer. The use of systemic therapy was significantly lower in patients older than 40 years, lower educational status, nonprivate insurance and with higher Charlson Comorbidity Scores. In addition, the use of systemic therapy was lower with female sex, African Americans/Hispanic, and lower socio-economic status. Understanding the barriers in the use of systemic therapy as well as appropriate utilization of systemic therapy can both optimize cancer care.

Although the median survival in polycythemia vera (PV) is 14 years, mortality is higher than in an age- and sex-matched population. This study included 3941 PV patients diagnosed between 2000-2012 from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 13 registry to determine 5-year survival and the incidence of second primary malignancies (SPM). The actuarial 5 year survival in the overall cohort was 79.5%. The cumulative incidence of SPM was 13.1% at 10 years. SPMs occurred at a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 1.29 (95% CI = 1.16-1.43; p < 0.001) with an absolute excess risk (AER) of 42.49 per 10 000 population. A significantly higher risk was noted for acute myeloid leukemia (SIR = 12.24; 95% CI = 8.17-17.8; p-value < 0.001) and chronic myeloid leukemia (SIR = 10.66; 95% CI = 3.75-19.6; p-value < 0.001). Patients with PV are at a high risk of SPM and leukemic transformation, which may compromise long-term survival.

No abstract

Confirmed cases of HIT in pregnant patients appear to be rare. Within the limits of retrospective analysis, the use of argatroban, danaparoid, fondaparinux and lepirudin may be effective in preventing the thrombotic complications of HIT in pregnancy. The effect of HIT or its therapy on obstetrical complications cannot be determined based on this study since many of the obstetrical complications are common in otherwise healthy pregnancies. Although this study did not identify any fetal teratogenicity except hypoplastic lung related to preterm delivery, small number of cases treated with various therapies precludes any definite conclusion.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease marked by the presence of several driver mutations and molecular subgroups even in a single patient. The genetic and molecular heterogeneity is also reflected by a progressive shift from a morphologic classification to one informed by causative genomic changes. Cytogenetic results and somatic mutations are increasingly being utilized to guide use of intensive chemotherapy and low‐intensity chemotherapy, particularly among older adults. Utilization of next‐generation sequencing in AML has led to increasing use of targeted treatments for actionable mutations. Quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction‐based mutational analysis and multicolor flow cytometry offer sensitive assays that can detect minimal residual disease (MRD). Several studies have shown that MRD negativity, as defined by specified cutoff values, is highly prognostic with potential therapeutic implications. The last 3 years mark an unprecedented history in the drug development in AML with approval of 8 new drugs and large portfolio of ongoing early and late‐phase trials of several promising drugs. Multiple combinatorial trials of approved agents and approval of newer agents in the future will continue to change the therapeutic landscape of AML.