Objective Wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery offers the opportunity to create a bloodless field without using an arm tourniquet. Lidocaine for anesthesia mixed with epinephrine for hemostasis is frequently used without concerns in the hand and finger. This is a major improvement for the patient and the surgeon in terms of patient comfort and having the opportunity to test the hand and finger function intraoperatively. The movement away from tourniquet surgery, which often requires sedation or general anaesthesia is one of the most significant recent advances in hand surgery. Methods A subcutaneous infiltration of a mixture (1:100’000) of lidocaine (1%) and epinephrine (buffered 10:1 with 8.4% bicarbonate) is done with a 27 G canula. The mixture is infiltrated wherever surgical dissection, k-wire insertion, or manipulation of fractured bones will occur. The local anesthetic results in an extravascular Bier block. The injection is done slowly from proximal to distal to minimize injection pain. After the last injection a minimum time of 30 minutes should be waited for maximal epinephrine vasoconstriction in the finger. Results In the beginning WALANT was only used for small procedures like trigger finger or carpal tunnel release. Meanwhile also major hand surgical procedures like finger fractures, flexor tendon repairs, tendon transfers, arthroscopies, arthroplasties and open triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair are performed in WALANT. Even procedures like trapeziectomy have been described using wide awake hand surgery, which involves numbing the joint itself. Conclusion The use of WALANT is a proven safe technique that can be used in up to 95% of hand surgical procedures. The benefits for patients and surgeons are obvious. Patients prefer the technique because there are no side effects of opiates or sedation. The anesthetic risk is minimized. Time at hospital is reduced. Patients do not have to suffer tourniquet pain. Surgeons prefer the technique because of the bloodless surgical field without tourniquet, the possibility of intraoperative testing of stability of prosthesis or fracture stabilization, strength of a tendon repair, the movement and gliding properties in the flexor tendon sheath after repair or testing the tension of tendon transfers. These are probably the reasons for the continuously growing popularity of this technique worldwide.
Background Irreparable proximal pole fractures of the scaphoid remain a real challenge for the treating handsurgeon. Standard salvage options include 4-corner fusion or proximal row carpectomy. These procedures limit the range of motion and have a high rate of conversion to total wrist fusion. The two current biological reconstructive options are the rib graft or the vascularized femoral trochlea osteocartilaginous free flap. In addition, there is the prosthetic semi-replacement arthroplasty using the pyrocarbon adaptive proximal scaphoid implant (APSI). Aims To present our series of patients with non-reconstructable proximal scaphoid nonunion/fracture (not suitable for conventional bone graft reconstruction) who were treated by the rib graft technique. Methods Our case series of 21 patients treated between March 2013 and January 2019 will been presented (median follow-up 29 months). The surgical technique will be described and crucial technical steps explained. The mean age at surgery was 26 years (SD 5.8) and the median time between injury and rib graft surgery was 2 years (IQR 1.7–3.6). The median postoperative follow-up was 29 months (IQR 19.5–42.4). Results All patients returned to their pre-surgical occupation. Significant differences were found in active wrist movements, grip strength, QuickDASH and PRWE pain scores. Union was seen in all 21 patients. The postoperative capitolunate angles were within normal limits. 17/21 patients showed no progessive postoperative osteoarthritic changes, while 4/21 showed slight progression. Progressive ossification of the graft was noted in 14 /21 patients. No donor site complication occurred. One patient failed and underwent excision of the scaphoid and fourcorner fusion 9 months after the rib graft. At the time of revision, the graft was clinically united. We found statistically significant improvements in QuickDASH and PRWE. Conclusions Our results suggest that reconstruction of the irreparable proximal pole scaphoid nonunion with costo-osteochondral graft reconstruction (rib graft) is a reliable and straightforward procedure in this challenging problem.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.