Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Long-term survivors of Hodgkin (HL) and non-Hodgkin (NHL) lymphomas experience late adverse effects of mediastinal radiotherapy and/or anthracycline containing chemotherapy, which lead to premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is unknown whether early stages of myocardial dysfunction and heart failure in these survivors can be detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Purpose To identify early sensitive markers for the detection of subclinical late cardiotoxicity using CMR in asymptomatic survivors of HL and (primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma) NHL. Methods For this prospective observational study, we included 80 HL or selected NHL survivors, who have been free of disease for ≥5 years and were treated with mediastinal radiotherapy (RT) with/without chemotherapy. Patients with known cardiac disease were excluded. Included patients were compared to 40 age- and sex matched healthy controls. CMR included 1) cine imaging for assessment of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) dimensions, systolic function and strain; 2) 2-dimensional late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging; 3) T2 mapping and 4) pre- and post-contrast T1 mapping (MOLLI) for assessment of native T1 values and extracellular volume (ECV). Results Of the 80 patients, 78 (98%) had a history of HL and 2 (2%) of NHL with a mean age of 47 ± 11 years (46% male). All patients were treated with mediastinal RT which was combined with anthracycline containing chemotherapy in 68 (85%) patients. The median interval between diagnosis and CMR was 20 [14 – 26] years. Differences in CMR characteristics between patients and healthy controls are shown in the table. LV end-systolic volume was statistically significantly higher, but LV ejection fraction and mass were significantly lower in patients compared to healthy controls. RV volumes were significantly lower in patients, but RV ejection fraction was preserved. Strain parameters of the LV, i.e. global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain and global radial strain, were slightly but significantly reduced in patients. No significant differences were found in myocardial T2 times and ECV; however, native myocardial T1 time was significantly higher in patients compared to healthy controls. LGE was detected in 25% of the patients and in the majority of patients with LGE this was classified as hinge point fibrosis. Conclusion Asymptomatic survivors of HL and NHL are not exempt of late cardiotoxicity, which can be detected by subtle changes in LV myocardial function, strain and native T1 value with CMR. Furthermore, late gadolinium enhancement was present in 25% of the patients. Further longitudinal studies are needed to assess the implication of these changes in relation to clinical outcome.
Key points Right ventricle (RV) function is the most important determinant of survival and quality of life in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).The changes in right and left ventricle gene expression that contribute to ventricular remodelling are incompletely investigated.RV remodelling in our CTEPH swine model is associated with increased expression of the genes involved in inflammation (TGFβ), oxidative stress (ROCK2, NOX1 and NOX4), and apoptosis (BCL2 and caspase‐3).Alterations in ROCK2 expression correlated inversely with RV contractile reserve during exercise.Since ROCK2 has been shown to be involved in hypertrophy, oxidative stress, fibrosis and endothelial dysfunction, ROCK2 inhibition may present a viable therapeutic target in CTEPH. AbstractRight ventricle (RV) function is the most important determinant of survival and quality of life in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). The present study investigated whether the increased cardiac afterload is associated with (i) cardiac remodelling and hypertrophic signalling; (ii) changes in angiogenic factors and capillary density; and (iii) inflammatory changes associated with oxidative stress and interstitial fibrosis. CTEPH was induced in eight chronically instrumented swine by chronic nitric oxide synthase inhibition and up to five weekly pulmonary embolizations. Nine healthy swine served as a control. After 9 weeks, RV function was assessed by single beat analysis of RV–pulmonary artery (PA) coupling at rest and during exercise, as well as by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, the heart was excised and RV and left ventricle (LV) tissues were processed for molecular and histological analyses. Swine with CTEPH exhibited significant RV hypertrophy in response to the elevated PA pressure. RV–PA coupling was significantly reduced, correlated inversely with pulmonary vascular resistance and did not increase during exercise in CTEPH swine. Expression of genes associated with hypertrophy (BNP), inflammation (TGFβ), oxidative stress (ROCK2, NOX1 and NOX4), apoptosis (BCL2 and caspase‐3) and angiogenesis (VEGFA) were increased in the RV of CTEPH swine and correlated inversely with RV–PA coupling during exercise. In the LV, only significant changes in ROCK2 gene‐expression occurred. In conclusion, RV remodelling in our CTEPH swine model is associated with increased expression of genes involved in inflammation and oxidative stress, suggesting that these processes contribute to RV remodelling and dysfunction in CTEPH and hence represent potential therapeutic targets.
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a deep learning (DL)–based reconstruction algorithm on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) image quality and to evaluate its influence on scar quantification. Methods Sixty patients (46 ± 17 years, 50% male) with suspected or known cardiomyopathy underwent CMR. Short-axis LGE images were reconstructed using the conventional reconstruction and a DL network (DLRecon) with tunable noise reduction (NR) levels from 0 to 100%. Image quality of standard LGE images and DLRecon images with 75% NR was scored using a 5-point scale (poor to excellent). In 30 patients with LGE, scar size was quantified using thresholding techniques with different standard deviations (SD) above remote myocardium, and using full width at half maximum (FWHM) technique in images with varying NR levels. Results DLRecon images were of higher quality than standard LGE images (subjective quality score 3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.001). Scar size increased with increasing NR levels using the SD methods. With 100% NR level, scar size increased 36%, 87%, and 138% using 2SD, 4SD, and 6SD quantification method, respectively, compared to standard LGE images (all p values < 0.001). However, with the FWHM method, no differences in scar size were found (p = 0.06). Conclusions LGE image quality improved significantly using a DL-based reconstruction algorithm. However, this algorithm has an important impact on scar quantification depending on which quantification technique is used. The FWHM method is preferred because of its independency of NR. Clinicians should be aware of this impact on scar quantification, as DL-based reconstruction algorithms are being used. Key Points • The image quality based on (subjective) visual assessment and image sharpness of late gadolinium enhancement images improved significantly using a deep learning–based reconstruction algorithm that aims to reconstruct high signal-to-noise images using a denoising technique. • Special care should be taken when scar size is quantified using thresholding techniques with different standard deviations above remote myocardium because of the large impact of these advanced image enhancement algorithms. • The full width at half maximum method is recommended to quantify scar size when deep learning algorithms based on noise reduction are used, as this method is the least sensitive to the level of noise and showed the best agreement with visual late gadolinium enhancement assessment.
The purpose of this study was to compare invasively measured aorta flow with 2D phase contrast flow and 4D flow measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in a large animal model. Nine swine (mean weight 63 ± 4 kg) were included in the study. 4D flow CMR exams were performed on a 1.5T MRI scanner. Flow measurements were performed on 4D flow images at the aortic valve level, in the ascending aorta, and main pulmonary artery. Simultaneously, flow was measured using an invasive flow probe, placed around the ascending aorta. Additionally, standard 2D phase contrast flow and 2D left ventricular (LV) volumetric data were used for comparison. The correlations of cardiac output (CO) between the invasive flow probe, and CMR modalities were strong to very strong. CO measured by 4D flow CMR correlated better with the CO measured by the invasive flow probe than 2D flow CMR flow and volumetric LV data (4D flow CMR: Spearman’s rho = 0.86 at the aortic valve level and 0.90 at the ascending aorta level; 2D flow CMR: 0.67 at aortic valve level; LV measurements: 0.77). In addition, there tended to be a correlation between mean pulmonary artery flow and aorta flow with 4D flow (Spearman’s rho = 0.65, P = 0.07), which was absent in measurements obtained with 2D flow CMR (Spearman’s rho = 0.40, P = 0.33). This study shows that aorta flow can be accurately measured by 4D flow CMR compared to simultaneously measured invasive flow. This helps to further validate the quantitative reliability of this technique. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s10554-019-01593-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.