A series of experiments was conducted where a range of injuries due to rice pests (pathogens, insects, and weeds) was manipulated simultaneously with a range of production factors (fertilizer input, water supply, crop establishment method, variety) in different seasons and years. These factors were chosen to represent lowland rice production situations characterized in surveys conducted in tropical Asia and their corresponding range of attainable yield. Experiments complemented one another in exploring the response surface of rice yields to yield-limiting and yield-reducing factors. The resulting experimental data base consisted of 445 individual plots and involved 11 manipulated injuries in a range of attainable yields of 2 to 11 t ha-1. A first, nonparametric, multivariate analysis led to a hierarchy of potential injuries, from marginally (e.g., bacterial leaf blight) to extremely harmful (e.g., rice tungro disease). A second, parametric, multivariate approach resulted in a multiple regression model involving factors generated by principal component analysis on injuries that adequately described the variation in actual yield. One major finding was that some (attainable yield × injury factors) interactions significantly contributed to the description of variation in actual yield, indicating that some injuries (or their combinations) had a stronger or weaker yield-reducing effect, depending on the level of attainable yield. For instance, yield losses due to sheath blight, weed infestation, and rice tungro disease tend to increase, remain stable, and decrease, respectively, with increasing attainable yields. Back-computations using the principal component regression model estimated yield losses caused by individual injuries, using the mean injury levels in a population of farmers' fields surveyed across tropical Asia. The results indicate that sheath blight, brown spot, and leaf blast are diseases that cause important losses (between 1 and 10%) regionally. Among the insect injuries, only white heads caused by stem borers appear of relevance (2.3% yield losses). These injuries, however, do not match in importance those caused by weeds, whether outgrowing the rice crop canopy (WA) or not (WB), both types of injuries causing about 20% yield losses when considered individually. When all mean injuries were combined into one mean injury profile occurring at a regional attainable yield of 5.5 t ha-1, a mean yield loss of 37.2% was estimated, indicating that injuries were less than additive in their yield-reducing effects. Scenario analyses were conducted in a set of (production situations × injury profiles) combinations characterized from surveys in farmers' fields in tropical Asia. Depending on the scenario chosen, losses ranging from 24 to 41% were found.

This bibliography on rice leaffolders contains 886 published and unpublished references for the period 1854 to June 1987. References are arranged alphabetically by the name of author and also classified by subjects. A distribution map, tables of alternate host plants, outbreaks, resistant rice varieties, resistant wild rices, natural enemies and developmental stages, and a brief description of current status of the leaffolders are also provided.Resume-Cette bibliographique sur la chenille tordeuse des feuille du riz (rice leaffolders) contient 886 references, publiees et non publiees, couvrant la periode de 1854 a Juin 1987. Les references sont classees par ordre alphabetique suivant le nom des auteurs et egalement par sujet. Une carte de la distribution du ravageur, des tableaux sur l'apparition des hautes densites de population du ravageur, sur les varietes resistantes de riz cultivees et sauvages, sur les ennemis naturels et les tables de vie plantes hotes ainsi qu'une description a jour du statut de la chenille tordeuse des feuilles sont egalement presentees. Mots Clefs: Bibliographie, Bradina admixtalis, Brachmia arotraea, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Marasmia bilinealis, M. exigua, M. palnalis, M. ruralis, M. suspicalis, M. trapezalis, M. venilialis, Oryza saliva, riz, chenille tordeuse des feuilles du riz INTRODUCTION

No abstract

The literature on the importance of plant pathogens sometimes emphasizes their possible role in historical food shortages and even in famines. Aside from such major crises, plant pathogens should also be seen as important reducers of crop performances, with impacts on system sustainability, from the ecological, agronomical, social, and economic standpoints – all contributing ultimately to affecting food security. These views need reconciliation in order to produce a clearer picture of the multidimensional effects of plant disease epidemics. Such a picture is needed for disease management today, but would also be useful for future policies. This article attempts to develop a framework that would enable assessment of the impacts of plant diseases, referred collectively to as crop health, on food security via its components. We have combined three different existing definitions of food security in order to develop a framework consisting of the following six components: (1) Availability. Primary production; (2) Availability. Import - Stockpiles; (3) Access. Physical and supply chain; (4) Access. Economic; (5) Stability of food availability; (6) Utility-Safety-Quality-Nutritive value. In this framework, components of food security are combined with three attributes of production situations: the nature of the considered crop (i.e. food- or non-food), the structure of farms (i.e. subsistence or commercial), and the structure of markets (i.e. weakly organized and local, to strongly organized and globalized). The resulting matrix: [Food security components] × [Attributes of production situations] provides a framework where the impacts of chronic, acute, and emerging plant disease epidemics on food security can be examined. We propose that, given the number of components and interactions at play, a systems modelling approach is required to address the functioning of food systems exposed to plant disease risks. This approach would have application in both the management of the current attrition of crop performances by plant diseases, and also of possible disease-induced shocks. Such an approach would also enable quantifying shifts in disease vulnerability of production situations, and therefore, of food systems, as a result of climate change, globalization, and evolving crop health. (Résumé d'auteur

A simulation study was conducted to assess the current and prospective efficiency of rice pest management and develop research priorities for lowland production situations in tropical Asia. Simulation modeling with the RICEPEST model provided the flexibility required to address varying production situations and diverse pest profiles (bacterial leaf blight, sheath blight, brown spot, leaf blast, neck blast, sheath rot, white heads, dead hearts, brown plant-hoppers, insect defoliators, and weeds). Operational definitions for management efficacy (injury reduction) and management efficiency (yield gain) were developed. This approach enabled the modeling of scenarios pertaining to different pest management strategies within the agroecological contexts of rice production and their associated pest injuries. Rice pests could be classified into two broad research priority-setting categories with respect to simulated yield losses and management efficiencies. One group, including weeds, sheath blight, and brown spot, consists of pests for which effective pest management tools need to be developed. The second group consists of leaf blast, neck blast, bacterial leaf blight, and brown plant-hoppers, for which the efficiency of current management methods is to be maintained. Simulated yield losses in future production situations indicated that a new type of rice plant with high-harvest index and high-biomass production ("New Plant Type") was more vulnerable to pests than hybrid rice. Simulations also indicated that the impact of deployment of host resistance (e.g., through genetic engineering) was much larger when targeted against sheath blight than when targeted against stem borers. Simulated yield losses for combinations of production situations and injury profiles that dominate current lowland rice production in tropical Asia ranged from 140 to 230 g m(-2). For these combinations, the simulated efficiency of current pest management methods, expressed in terms of relative yield gains, ranged from 0.38 to 0.74. Overall, the analyses indicated that 120 to 200 x 10(6) tons of grain yield are lost yearly to pests over the 87 x 10(6) ha of lowland rice in tropical Asia. This also amounts to the potential gain that future pest management strategies could achieve, if deployed.