We have quantified the potentiating effects of 1.7% sevoflurane (n = 12) on vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block and compared the results with those obtained during balanced anaesthesia with propofol (n = 12) or midazolam (n = 12) in 36 patients. Neuromuscular function was monitored using an accelerograph and the train-of-four responses of the adductor pollicis muscle to ulnar nerve stimulation. Vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 was administered as an intubating dose, and maintenance doses of 0.02 mg kg-1 were administered on three occasions when T1/T0 had recovered to 25%. Thereafter, spontaneous recovery was monitored until complete. Times to 25% recovery of T1/T0 (DUR25) after an intubating dose of vecuronium did not differ between groups (mean 44.2 (SD 18.7) min for sevoflurane, 38.3 (7.5) min for propofol and 35.5 (9.5) min for midazolam). DUR25 values after each maintenance dose were 29.8 (9.5) min, 30.3 (10.4) min and 31.6 (10.7) min during sevoflurane anaesthesia, and were significantly longer than values for propofol (21.7 (6.0) min, 21.5 (5.8) min and 21.9 (5.8) min) and midazolam (20.0 (5.9) min, 19.3 (7.7) min and 19.8 (8.0) min) (P< 0.05) in each case). Recovery index25-75% and interval from T1/T0 = 25% to T4/T1 = 0.7 after the final dose of vecuronium were significantly prolonged by sevoflurane (28.3 (13.2) min and 42.7 (16.4) min) compared with propofol (17.6 (6.1) min and 26.6 (9.8) min) or midazolam (16.3 (9.4) min and 26.0 (10.2) min) (P < 0.05 in each case).
This study was performed to evaluate the inhibitory effect on motor nerve terminals by rocuronium using recovery curves of muscle compound action potentials (CAPs) and train-of-four ratios (TOFRs) in anaesthetized cats, and to compare the results with other relaxants reported previously. Recovery curves were derived from the amplitude of the CAP induced in the gastrocnemius muscle by the second of a paired stimulus (test response) to the sciatic nerve and compared with results evoked by the first component (conditioning response). The interval between the paired stimuli was increased stepwise from 7 to 1,000 msec, and the differences in amplitude of the test and conditioning responses were plotted on a graph by relating the changes in paired intervals. The recovery curve after rocuronium was less inhibited than after pancuronium, (100.4 +/- 5.9%, 82.3 +/- 6.7% and 68.5 +/- 6.7% at 60, 100 and 500 msec intervals, compared with 70.3 +/- 3.3%, 59.0 +/- 4.7% and 46.7 +/- 4.3% after pancuronium (P < 0.05). The recovery curves with d-tubocurarine were more depressed than with pancuronium; however, the RC with vecuronium was similar to that of rocuronium. The degree of fade in TOF by rocuronium was also less than those seen with d-tubocurarine and pancuronium. The results obtained suggest that rocuronium has less inhibitory effect on motor nerve terminals than do d-tubocurarine and pancuronium, and has a similar effect to that of vecuronium.
The twitch responses evoked from the abductor hallucis muscle (AHM) and the adductor pollicis muscle (APM) were examined simultaneously in 20 anesthetized patients following a single bolus intravenous administration of 0.04 mg·kg of vecuronium bromide. The mean onset time of vecuronium-induced depression of AHM twitch responses was significantly slower than that of APM twitch responses (4.9±1.5 minvs 3.7±1.2 min, mean±SD,P<0.001), and when the clinical duration times of vecuronium were compared, AHM twitch responses recovered more quickly than APM twitch responses (15.3±4.1 minvs 19.6±6.7 min,P<0.01), although there was no statistically significant difference in the spontaneous recovery time between AHM and APM (9.8±2.9 minvs 10.0±3.6 min). It is concluded that the twitch responses of AHM may be a useful monitor of neuromuscular blockade in anesthetized patients in whom setting the blockade monitor on the patient's arms is difficult, although monitoring of twitch response of AHM is less sensitive than that of APM in case of vecuronium administration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.