The cranial anatomy of Orlovichthys limnatis, a Famennian, Late Devonian dipnoan from the Orel region of central Russia, is described on the basis of an almost completely preserved skull, a mandible, and numerous elements of the dentition. Orlovichthys is distinguished from other tooth-plated Devonian dipnoans by its relatively narrow skull and its predatory type of tooth-plate morphology on the pterygoid and prearticular. The marginal dentition of Orlovichthys, which extends transversely across the edge of the ossified ethmoid (upper lip) and along the anterior and lateral edges of the dentary, also appears to be organized as tooth plates. The distribution of marginal dentition among Devonian dipnoans and their probable organization as tooth plates prompts us to suggest that an important developmental constraint may have been associated with the dipnoan dentition throughout the long history of this group.
Although the 3 genera of living lungfish have different‐shaped adult tooth plates, their larval stages have similar patterns of development. The sequence in the pattern of initiation of teeth and their modification through ontogeny in Neoceratodus hatchlings provides a developmental model for fossil hatchling tooth plates (smallest 1–2 mm) recovered as 3‐dimensional dentitions from Andreyevichthys. This Late Devonian lungfish demonstrates that these also have a similar dentition pattern and suggests strongly conserved developmental processes. We postulate that a specific pattern of development, derived within lungfish, has been conserved in extant forms through evolution from the earliest known lungfish. The most basal early dipnoan, Diabolepis speratus, is also known from juveniles with tooth plates formed in this pattern.
The lungfish pattern is in marked contrast to the typical linear rows of teeth with lingual replacement for each tooth position, characteristic of most osteichthyan and chondrichthyan dentitions. Uniquely for lungfish, teeth are only added to the lateral ends of the radial rows in the palatal and lingual dentition and are consolidated into dental plates without loss through shedding. It is proposed that this tooth pattern is set up from primordial teeth at the patterning stage of the dentition, one in each dentate region of the larval jaws. Although in post‐Devonian lungfish marginal dentate bones are absent in the adult, in both the fossil and extant hatchling, teeth are present and function on some of the marginal bones. This pattern of development and loss is described and we conclude that in both forms it is also based on a radial pattern of successive tooth initiation. We propose that this ontogenetic pattern constrained the phylogenetic pattern of adult form, through evolution of dipnoan dentitions from 360 MYBP until the present. The universality amongst dipnoans and the implications for such a conserved constraint in the developmental module for the dentition is discussed.
The lungfish dentition is different from other osteichthyan fish because it has a characteristic and unique pattern of teeth arranged as toothplates. Growth, addition of teeth, and retention as part of a statodont dentition are determined by the initiation pattern. In adult lungfish new teeth are only added laterally to each radial row in the dentition. This is in marked contrast to marginal rows of teeth with regular, alternating replacement in most osteichthyans. We analyze development from fossil hatchling forms of the Late Devonian dipnoan Andreyevichthys and compare with those of Neoceratodus, the Australian lungfish. The specific pattern of development, unique within lungfish, is also present in the transitory, marginal, anterior dentition in both, reflecting a strongly conserved developmental pattern. These marginal teeth form but are then lost in both, so that also this program of development is conserved within lungfish for 360 million years, from the earliest known form.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.