The sensitivity of duodenal string-capsule culture (DSCC) was compared to that of bone-marrow-aspirate culture (BMAC), single 3-ml blood culture (BC), and rectal-swab culture (RSC) for isolating Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi type A from patients with typhoid and paratyphoid fever. In 36 of 154 patients DSCC could not be used, usually because the patient was too ill to swallow the capsule. In the remaining 118 patients DSCC was positive in 57.6%, RSC in 35.6%, BC in 54.2%, and BMAC in 85.6%. The sensitivity of DSCC was improved by an additional 4.7% if subcultured daily for seven days. The DSCC has no advantage over the combination of RSC and BC and is inferior in sensitivity to the BMAC. However, when a BMAC cannot be obtained, the addition of the DSCC to BC and RSC can be expected to improve the isolation rate by greater than 17%, to at least 85%.
Detection of Salmonella typhi in blood by culture of the mononuclear cell-platelet layer was compared with other methods currently used for the diagnosis of typhoid fever. Colonies of S. typhi were present in all mononuclear cell-platelet layer-positive cultures within 18 h of plating and were identified within an additional 10 min by a coagglutination technique. In contrast, identification of all positive cultures by conventional blood culture required 3 days.
DNA probe was used to detect Salmonella typhi from blood samples from 14 of 33 patients with culture-confirmed typhoid fever, using the equivalent of 2.5 ml of blood. In contrast, S. typhi was detected in 17 of the same 33 patients by culture of 8 ml of blood. The probe hybridized to blood samples of 4 of 47 patients from whom S. typhi was not isolated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.