No abstract

In patients who failed standard eradicating treatments, a 10-day course of rifabutin with pantoprazole and amoxycillin is more effective and well tolerated than the quadruple therapy.

In cirrhotic patients prothrombotic mutations by themselves are not causative of PVT. Sclerotherapy and previous abdominal surgery favour the development of two-thirds of cases of PVT; in the remaining cases the pathogenesis remains elusive.

Although relatively frequent. diabetic involvement of digestive tract motility has not been investigated extensively in different organs. The authors studied esophageal, gastric, and gallbladder motor function in 35 type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetic patients to determine the extent of gut involvement. Of these patients, 27 (77%) had peripheral neuropathy, 12 (34%) had both peripheral and autonomic neuropathy, and 22 (63%) had gastrointestinal symptoms. Esophageal manometric abnormalities were recorded in 18 patients, and delayed radionuclide emptying of the esophagus was documented in 16 patients, with a 83% concordance between the two tests. Scintigraphic gastric emptying of solids was delayed in 56% of patients, whereas gallbladder emptying after cholecystokinin stimulation was reduced in 69% of them. In 74% of patients at least one of the viscera under investigation showed abnormal motor function; however, only 36% of patients displayed involvement of the three organs. Gastrointestinal symptoms, duration and therapy of diabetes, previous poor glycemic control, and retinopathy did not correlate with the presence or the extent of motor disorders. Neuropathy was not predictive of gastrointestinal involvement and its extent; however, when motor abnormalities were present in patients with neuropathy, these were usually more severe. Gastrointestinal motor disorders are frequent and widespread in type 2 diabetics, regardless of symptoms. Autonomic neuropathy has a poor predictive value on motor disorders (0.75 for the esophagus, 0.5 for the stomach, 0.8 for the gallbladder), thus suggesting the coexistence of other pathophysiologic mechanisms.

Combination of endotherapy with either PPIs or H2RAs is indicated for nonbleeding ulcers at endoscopy with the intent to reduce rebleeding and surgery. Its value may extend to bleeding lesions, but current data are scanty. The benefit appears to be independent from route and doses of PPIs, as oral, bolus, or infusional methods are all effective.

Following endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding ulcers, standard-dose PPIs infusion was as effective as a high-dose regimen in reducing the risk of recurrent bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00374101).

Methods: The efficacy of pancreatic stenting in the prevention of pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was evaluated by a meta-analysis of 6 controlled studies; 12 additional uncontrolled studies were analyzed for rates of associated risk. Results: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) developed in 16.5% of controls, and in 5.1 or 9.6% of the stent group at the per-protocol (PP) or intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses. By analyzing only the 4 randomized trials, PEP developed in 24.1% of controls, and in 6.1 or 12.0% of the stented patients at the PP or ITT analyses. Risk was significantly lower in the stent group when compared with controls: OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.24–0.81). The absolute risk reduction is 12.0 (95% CI 3.0–21.0), the number needed to treat 8 (95% CI 5–34), and the publication bias 2. ORs for mild to moderate PEP were reduced in the stent group (OR = 0.537, 95% CI 0.283–1.021), as were those for severe PEP (OR = 0.123, 95% CI 0.021–0.726). Non-pancreatic complications were 4.2%, and included early stent migration (1.4%), perforations (0.4%), bleeding (1.4%), and infections (1.0%). Conclusion: Available trials show benefit for pancreatic stenting in the prophylaxis of PEP, but more randomized studies are needed before endorsing a routine use of this endoscopic procedure.

In severe attacks of UC, methyl-prednisolone given as a continuous infusion was no better than bolus administration in terms of efficacy and safety.