Fifty native Omanis with vitiligo were studied to compare the incidence of HLA ABC and DR antigens with a control population. HLA Bw6 was found in 82% of patients compared with 49% controls (Pc = 0.0009 RR = 4.56) and HLA DR7 occurred in 40% of patients and 9% in controls (Pc = 0.00075 RR = 6.17). HLA DR7 was significantly increased in those patients with acrofacial, compared to focal disease (57% vs. 24% P = 0.038). Sixty-six per cent of the patients in this study had parents who were consanguineous and a positive family history was only found in this group with an incidence of 32%. HLA Bw4 segregated 100% with patients with a positive family history compared with 48% in consanguineous patients without a positive family history (Pc = 0.011 RR = 23). Vitiligo appears to be associated with different HLA antigens in different ethnic groups.

Ten patients with macular amyloidosis were studied with particular reference to the role of friction. All 10 patients had a history of prolonged rubbing over a period of 2-5 years with various objects, such as bath sponges, brushes, towels, plant sticks and leaves. The presence of amyloid was confirmed by histochemical stains in six cases and by electron microscopy in four cases. The study confirms the role of friction in the causation of macular amyloidosis and hence, the term 'frictional amyloidosis' aptly describes the condition. The study also emphasizes the need for electron microscopy in the diagnosis of frictional amyloidosis.

Skin typing, as proposed by Fitzpatrick, has been used for estimating the initial dose in phototherapy.1 However, several reports have questioned the reliability of the method.2-4 It has been suggested that skin typing should not be the sole basis for starting UV-B phototherapy, and that determining the minimum erythema dose (MED) is a more reliable method of estimating the UV-B dosage.5 There is little published data with respect to skin types and MED values in Arab skin. In this review, we present our experience on the subject with Bahraini patients.

Although DIF is an extremely useful diagnostic tool, it should always be used in conjunction with histopathology and the combination of the two methods yields the best results.