Background Recent advances in the treatment algorithms of early breast cancer have markedly improved overall survival. However, anthracycline- and trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity may lead to dose-reduction or halt in potentially life-saving adjuvant cancer therapy. Early initiated neurohormonal blockade may prevent or attenuate the cardiotoxicity-induced reduction in cardiac function, but prior studies have been inconclusive. The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril/valsartan has been shown to be superior to traditional treatment in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but its cardioprotective effects in the cardio-oncology setting remains to be tested. Objective To assess if sacubitril/valsartan given concomitantly with early breast cancer treatment regimens including anthracyclines, with or without trastuzumab, may prevent cardiac dysfunction. Methods PRADA II is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, multi-center, investigator-initiated clinical trial. Breast cancer patients from four university hospitals in Norway, scheduled to receive (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin independently of additional trastuzumab/pertuzumab treatment, will be randomized 1:1 to sacubitril/valsartan or placebo. The target dose is 97/103 mg b.i.d. The patients will be examined with cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), echocardiography, circulating cardiovascular biomarkers and functional testing at baseline, at end of anthracycline treatment and following 18 months after enrolment. The primary outcome measure of the PRADA II trial is the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by CMR from baseline to 18 months. Secondary outcomes include change in LV function by global longitudinal strain by CMR and echocardiography and change in circulating cardiac troponin concentrations. Results The study is ongoing. Results will be published when the study is completed. Conclusion PRADA II is the first randomized, placebo-controlled study of sacubitril/valsartan in a cardioprotective setting during (neo-)adjuvant breast cancer therapy. It may provide new insight in prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving adjuvant or neo-adjuvant therapy containing anthracyclines. Furthermore, it may enable identification of patients at higher risk of developing cardiotoxicity and identification of those most likely to respond to cardioprotective therapy. Trial registration The trial is registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry (identifier NCT03760588). Registered 30 November 2018.
ObjectivesGonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulates immune responses; therefore, antagonizing GnRH with cetrorelix may have anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of this study was to assess short-term cetrorelix therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.MethodIn this proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind study involving 99 patients with active, long-standing RA, 48 patients received subcutaneous cetrorelix (5 mg/day on days 1 and 2; 3 mg/day on days 3–5) and 51 received placebo. The primary end-point was the change in the 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) by day 5, when the greatest GnRH suppression was anticipated. Secondary end-points included the change in tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and achievement of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses and DAS28-CRP < 2.6 by day 5. Patients were followed up on days 10 and 15.ResultsBy day 5, DAS28-CRP was non-significantly reduced by 0.82 in the cetrorelix group compared to a 0.57 reduction in the placebo group (p = 0.091), TNF-α (log pg/mL) was significantly reduced in the cetrorelix group compared with the placebo group [0.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08–1.01, p = 0.023], and more patients on cetrorelix achieved ACR20 responses (40% vs. 18%, p = 0.015) and DAS28-CRP < 2.6 (13% vs. 0%, p = 0.009). Inflammatory markers increased towards baseline levels after withdrawal of treatment. Rates of adverse events were similar in both groups.ConclusionsAlthough there was no significant difference in the primary end-point between groups, antagonizing GnRH led to significant improvements in key secondary end-points. Thus, GnRH antagonists may have rapid anti-inflammatory effects in RA, already occurring within 5 days. The data suggest a novel mode of action for TNF-α inhibition in RA, and potentially in other autoimmune diseases.
IRD was associated with higher levels of both 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)D. These findings argue against the hypothesis that patients with high systemic inflammatory burden (CAD+IRD) should have lower vitamin D levels than those with less inflammation (CAD only). Of note, when controlled for potential confounders, low 1,25(OH)D levels were associated with adventitial aortic inflammation.
Background: Results from studies with bevacizumab in addition to traditional neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) indicate a need for predictive biomarkers. As a sub-study of the NeoAva study (a neoadjuvant study), the aim was to investigate the potential association between the presence of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in peripheral blood (PB), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in PB and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in bone marrow (BM) at different time points during NAT +/- bevacizumab and at one year follow-up, and therapy response. Patients and methods: A total of 150 HER2-negative patients with cT2-4 (≥ 2.5cm) N0-3 M0 status were randomized to receive NAT with or without bevacizumab. In this sub-study, 90 patients have so far been analyzed. Of these, 82 received chemotherapy (FEC100→taxane) and 8 received endocrine therapy (letrozole) + / - bevacizumab. Therapy response was evaluated according to the RECIST criteria and achievement of pathological complete response (pCR). Number of CECs, CTCs and DTCs were assessed at baseline after 12 weeks, at surgery (after 24 weeks) and at one year follow-up. Blood samples were analyzed by CellSearch® to assess CEC and CTC counts. The detection of DTCs was performed by immunocytochemical analysis of 2 × 106 BM mononuclear cells. Results: The pathological complete response rate was 10 out of 90 (11.1%), eight of these patients received bevacizumab. For bevacizumab-treated patients with a change in CEC counts from baseline to time of surgery below median change (27 CECs), 35% (6/17) achieved pCR compared to 6% (1/18) in the group with a CEC count-increase above median change (p = 0.035). The corresponding pCR rates for patients not receiving bevacizumab (median CEC change 131 CECs) were 0% (0/15) and 13% (2/14), respectively. Stepwise testing of thresholds for CEC changes in the bevacizumab-arm revealed significant associations to pCR for change-values between 20 and 40. CTC- and DTC-status or -changes were not associated with tumor response or CEC changes. Conclusion: The presented results indicate that the level of change in the number of circulating endothelial cells during neoadjuvant therapy including bevacizumab is associated with the pathological complete response rate in breast cancer patients. This supports additional testing of CECs as a surrogate marker for response to this treatment. The analyses will be up-dated with results from the rest of the included patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-08-21.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.