PIH was associated with reduced odds of mortality and ROP (all infants), but higher odds for BPD (<29 weeks' gestation). The paradoxical reduction in mortality may be due to survival bias and deserves further exploration in future studies.

Objective: We sought to evaluate physiological cardiorespiratory implications of high pressures (>8 cmH 2 O) on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm neonates. Methods: Fifteen preterm neonates at postmenstrual age ≥32 weeks on CPAP 5 cmH 2 O were enrolled. Pressures were increased by 2 cmH 2 O increments until 13 cmH 2 O. At each increment, cardiac output, electrical diaphragmatic (Edi) activity, and clinical cardiorespiratory parameters were measured. Predefined cut-off values for changes in cardiorespiratory parameters were used as termination criteria. Data, presented as mean (SD), were compared using repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: The mean GA, age at study, and weight of subjects were 27.4 (2.6) weeks, 58.5 (35.5) days, and 2.3 (0.6) kg, respectively. The median (IQR) time at each CPAP increment was 10 (5, 20) min. Cardiac output (mL/kg/min) at 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13 cmH 2 O were not different at 295 (75), 290 (66), 281 (69), 286 (73), and 292 (58), respectively (P = 0.99). Edi values demonstrated a trend towards decline at 9 cmH 2 O before rising again. No other cardiorespiratory parameter was different across CPAP levels; no subject met termination criteria. Conclusion: High CPAP levels were well tolerated for short durations. Further physiological and clinical research is required on safety/efficacy in neonates with more severe lung disease, as well as its impact over longer durations. K E Y W O R D S cardiac output, continuous distending pressure, electrical activity of diaphragm, noninvasive respiratory support, positive end-expiratory pressure

Objective To evaluate the physiological impact of high CPAP (≥9 cmH 2 O) vs. NIPPV at equivalent mean airway pressures. Study design In this cross-over study, preterm neonates on high CPAP or NIPPV were placed on the alternate mode. After 30 min, left and right ventricular cardiac output and work of breathing indices were assessed, following which patients were placed back on the original mode and a similar procedure ensued. Results Fifteen infants with mean (SD) postmenstrual age 32.7 (3.0) weeks, and weight 1569 (564) grams were included. No differences in LVO [320 (63) vs. 331 (86) mL/kg/min, P = 0.46] or RVO [420 (135) vs. 437 (141) mL/kg/min, P = 0.19] were noted during high CPAP vs. NIPPV, along with no differences in work of breathing indices. Conclusion High CPAP pressures did not adversely impact cardiac output or work of breathing compared to NIPPV at equivalent mean airway pressure.

No abstract

Sudden unexpected clinical deterioration or cardiorespiratory instability is common in neonates and is often referred as a “crashing” neonate. The established resuscitation guidelines provide an excellent framework to stabilize and evaluate these infants, but it is primarily based upon clinical assessment only. However, clinical assessment in sick neonates is limited in identifying underlying pathophysiology. The Crashing Neonate Protocol (CNP), utilizing point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), is specifically designed for use in neonatal emergencies. It can be applied both in term and pre-term neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The proposed protocol involves a stepwise systematic assessment with basic ultrasound views which can be easily learnt and reproduced with focused structured training on the use of portable ultrasonography (similar to the FAST and BLUE protocols in adult clinical practice). We conducted a literature review of the evidence-based use of POCUS in neonatal practice. We then applied stepwise voting process with a modified DELPHI strategy (electronic voting) utilizing an international expert group to prioritize recommendations. We also conducted an international survey among a group of neonatologists practicing POCUS. The lead expert authors identified a specific list of recommendations to be included in the proposed CNP. This protocol involves pre-defined steps focused on identifying the underlying etiology of clinical instability and assessing the response to intervention.Conclusion: To conclude, the newly proposed POCUS-based CNP should be used as an adjunct to the current recommendations for neonatal resuscitation and not replace them, especially in infants unresponsive to standard resuscitation steps, or where the underlying cause of deterioration remains unclear. What is known? • Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is helpful in evaluation of the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms in sick infants. What is new? • The Crashing Neonate Protocol (CNP) is proposed as an adjunct to the current recommendations for neonatal resuscitation, with pre-defined steps focused on gaining information regarding the underlying pathophysiology in unexplained “crashing” neonates. • The proposed CNP can help in targeting specific and early therapy based upon the underlying pathophysiology, and it allows assessment of the response to intervention(s) in a timely fashion.

No abstract

BackgroundGrowth of neonatal intensive care units in number and size has raised questions towards ability to maintain continuity and quality of care. Structural organization of intensive care units is known as a key element for maintaining the quality of care of these fragile patients. The reconstruction of megaunits of intensive care to smaller care units within a single operational service might help with provision of safe and effective care.Methods/DesignThe clinical team and patient distribution lay out, admission and discharge criteria and interdisciplinary round model was reorganized to follow the microstructure philosophy. A working group met weekly to formulate the implementation planning, to review the adaptation and adjustment process and to ascertain the quality of implementation following the initiation of the microsystem model.DiscussionIn depth examination of microsystem model of care in this study, provides systematic evaluation of this model on variable aspects of health care. The individual projects of this trial can be source of solid evidence for guidance of future decisions on optimized model of care for the critically ill newborns.Trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov, NCT02912780. Retrospectively registered on 22 September 2016.

No abstract