Iron deficiency anemia is a cause of reactive thrombocytosis. A moderate increase in platelet numbers is common but sometimes counts may exceed 1,000 × 10⁹/l. The mechanisms causing reactive thrombocytosis are unclear. In this study, we evaluated 15 women with iron deficiency anemia and thrombocytosis (platelets >450 × 10⁹/l) and 16 women with iron deficiency anemia with normal platelet counts. Serum samples were taken before oral iron replacement therapy, after 1 and 3 months and at the end of replacement therapy. Thrombopoietin, erythropoietin (EPO), leukemia inhibitory factor, interleukin-6 and interleukin-11 levels were assayed. There was no change in the levels of thrombopoietic cytokines except for EPO. The correlation between high EPO levels and high platelet counts may suggest that EPO increases platelet counts, but the same EPO level changes can also be demonstrated in women with iron deficiency anemia but normal initial platelet counts. The fact that the levels of other cytokines remained unchanged during treatment suggests that either these cytokines have no effect on reactive thrombocytosis or the change in platelet counts in our patients is in a narrow range and is thus not affected by the cytokine levels.

Background Non-T-cell depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HaploSCT) is being increasingly used in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with improving patient outcomes. We have recently reported that outcomes of adult patients (pts) with ALL in complete remission (CR) receiving HaploSCT are comparable to unrelated donor transplants. We now compared HaploSCT and matched sibling donor (MSD) transplants in pts with ALL. Aim To assess transplantation outcomes of HaploSCT and MSD transplants in pts with ALL in CR. Methods We retrospectively analyzed adult patients (≥ 18 years) with ALL who underwent their first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in first or second CR between 2012 and 2018, either from a T cell replete Haplo or MSD donor, and whose data were reported to the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Multivariate analysis (MVA) adjusting for differences between the groups was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Propensity score matching was also performed to reduce confounding effects. Results The analysis comprised 2304 patients: HaploSCT-413; MSD-1891. Median follow-up was 25 months. Median age was 37 (range 18–75) and 38 (18–76) years in HaploSCT and MSD, respectively. HaploSCT patients were transplanted more recently than those transplanted from MSD (2016 vs 2015, p < 0.0001). A higher rate of HaploSCT was in CR2 (33.4% vs 16.7%, p < 0.0001), respectively, and fewer received myeloablative conditioning (68% vs 83.2%, p < 0.0001). Cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity was lower in HaploSCT patients (22% vs 28%, p = 0.01) and donors (27.1% vs 33%, p < 0.02), and a higher proportion of the HaploSCTs were performed using a bone marrow (BM) graft (46.2% vs 18.6%, p < 0.0001). The 2 groups did not differ with regard to gender, Karnofsky performance status score, ALL phenotype, Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positivity and pre-alloSCT measurable residual disease (MRD). Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was mainly post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based (92.7%) in the HaploSCT setting, while it was mostly pharmacologic in the setting of MSD (18.7% received ATG). Cumulative incidence of engraftment at day 60 was higher in MSD transplants compared to HaploSCT (98.7% vs 96.3%, p = 0.001), respectively. Day 180 incidence of acute (a) GVHD II-IV and III-IV was higher in HaploSCT vs. MSD: 36.3% vs 28.9% (p = 0.002 and 15.2% vs 10.5% (p = 0.005), respectively. Conversely, the 2-year chronic (c) GVHD and extensive cGVHD were 32% vs 38.8% (p = 0.009) and 11.9% vs 19.5% (p = 0.001) in HaploSCT vs MSD, respectively. Main causes of death were leukemia (31.8% vs 45%), infection (33.1% vs 19.7%) and GVHD (16.6% vs 19.7%) for HaploSCT and MSD, respectively. Two-year relapse incidence (RI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 26% vs 31.6%, 22.9% vs 13%, 51% vs 55.4%, 58.8% vs 67.4% and 40.6% vs 39% for HaploSCT and MSD, respectively. In the MVA, RI was significantly lower in HaploSCT in comparison with MSD, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66 (95% CI 0.52–0.83, p = 0.004), while NRM was significantly higher, HR = 1.9 (95% CI 1.43–2.53, p < 0.0001). aGVHD grade II-IV and grade III-IV were higher in HaploSCT than in MSD HR = 1.53 (95% CI 1.23–1.9, p = 0.0002) and HR = 1.54 (95% CI 1.1–2.15, p = 0.011), respectively. Extensive cGVHD was lower in HaploSCT compared with MSD, HR = 0.61 (95% CI 0.43–0.88, p = 0.007), while total cGVHD did not differ significantly, HR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.74–1.18, p = 0.58). LFS, OS and GRFS did not differ significantly between the 2 transplant groups, HR = 0.96 (95% CI 0.81–1.14, p = 0.66); HR = 1.18 (95% CI 0.96–1.43, p = 0.11) and HR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.79–1.09, p = 0.37), respectively. These results were confirmed in a matched-pair analysis. Conclusions Outcomes of adult patients with ALL in CR receiving alloSCT from haploidentical donors are not significantly different from those receiving transplants from MSD in terms of LFS, OS and GRFS.

Summary:The risk and outcome of infection in febrile neutropenic patients is mainly determined by the duration of neutropenia, the underlying disease or the treatment. This study was undertaken to compare infections and the outcome after conventional chemotherapy (CCT), allogeneic PBSC transplantation (alloPBSCT) or autologous PBSC transplantation (autoPBSCT), during the period of neutropenia, in a single center. A total of 145 patients (50 in CCT group, 50 in alloPBSCT and 45 in autoPBSCT) were evaluated. In the alloPBSCT group, 86% of the patients (43/50), in the autoPBSCT group 93% of the patients (42/45) and in the CCT group 92% (46/50) of the patients had at least one febrile episode during their neutropenic period (P Ͼ 0.05). Microbiologically and/or clinically documented infection rates were 50% (25/50), 42% (19/45) and 48% (24/50) respectively. Gram-positive pathogens, mostly coagulase-negative staphylococci were the most frequent cause of bacteremias in all groups. The frequency of CNS infections was significantly higher in the alloPBSCT and autoPBSCT groups compared to the CCT group (P Ͻ 0.008 and P Ͻ 0.04, respectively). Catheter infections were frequent in the PBSCT groups and pulmonary infections were more frequent in the CCT group (P Ͻ 0.05). The CCT group needed longer antibiotic usage compared to the alloPBSCT group (P Ͻ 0.006). The duration of neutropenia and the type of treatment given, does not affect the rate of febrile episodes, but affects the type of infections in febrile neutropenic patients. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 211-214. Keywords: febrile neutropenia; allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; chemotherapy Infectious complications are associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancies. Currently, this complication occurs more frequently and is related to the increased use of high-dose treatment modalities, and stem

Background There is no information on the impact of donor type in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) using homogeneous graft-versus-host (GVHD) prophylaxis with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Methods We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of adult patients with ALL in CR1 that had received HCT with PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis from HLA-matched sibling (MSD) (n = 78), matched unrelated (MUD) (n = 94) and haploidentical family (Haplo) (n = 297) donors registered in the EBMT database between 2010 and 2018. The median follow-up period of the entire cohort was 2.2 years. Results Median age of patients was 38 years (range 18–76). Compared to MSD and MUD, Haplo patients received peripheral blood less frequently. For Haplo, MUD, and MSD, the cumulative incidence of 100-day acute GVHD grade II–IV and III–IV, and 2-year chronic and extensive chronic GVHD were 32%, 41%, and 34% (p = 0.4); 13%, 15%, and 15% (p = 0.8); 35%, 50%, and 42% (p = 0.01); and 11%, 17%, and 21% (p = 0.2), respectively. At 2 years, the cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 20%, 20%, and 28% (p = 0.8); and 21%, 18%, and 21% (p = 0.8) for Haplo, MUD, and MSD, respectively. The leukemia-free survival, overall survival and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival for Haplo, MUD, and MSD was 59%, 62%, and 51% (p = 0.8); 66%, 69%, and 62% (p = 0.8); and 46%, 44%, and 35% (p = 0.9), respectively. On multivariable analysis, transplant outcomes did not differ significantly between donor types. TBI-based conditioning was associated with better LFS. Conclusions Donor type did not significantly affect transplant outcome in patient with ALL receiving SCT with PTCy.

Summary:A 46-year-old white male with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) limited to the thorax developed autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (AITP), following a cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel and G-CSF-containing regimen for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. AITP associated with small or non-small cell lung cancer has been reported. We considered that the AITP in this case may be a part of paraneoplastic syndrome, which is frequently seen in patients with SCLC. The patient received HDC and autologous PBSC transplantation (APBSCT) for SCLC and the AITP resolved following transplantation, thus supporting the concept of HDC + APBSCT for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.