Latar Belakang: Adanya satu kasus difteri terkonfirmasi laboratorium secara klinis menjadi dasar suatu daerah dinyatakan sebagai KLB. Awal tahun 2018, kasus difteri dikatakan berakhir pada 85 dari 170 Kabupaten/ Kota (termasuk DKI Jakarta, Banten, dan Jawa Barat). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan kejadian difteri pada pasien anak di RSPI Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso tahun 2018. Metode: penelitian ini menggunakan desain case control. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 60 sampel, yaitu 20 kasus pasien difteri klinis dan terkonfirmasi laboratorium, serta 40 kontrol pasien PD3I tidak difteri. Pengambilan sampel kasus menggunakan sampling jenuh, sedangkan kontrol dengan quota sampling. Adapun kriteria inklusi kasus yaitu tercatat sebagai pasien rawat inap atau rawat jalan dan memiliki catatan rekam medis, sedangkan kriteria ekslusi kasus yaitu tidak terdapatnya catatan imunisasi. Data sekunder tentang kasus difteri diperoleh dari data surveilans dan rekam medis tahun 2018. Data dianalisis secara univariat, bivariat, dan multivariat. Hasil: berdasarkan hasil analisis diketahui bahwa variabel status imunisasi berhubungan secara bermakna (p-value = 0.002) dan paling dominan berpengaruh (OR = 5.060) terhadap kejadian difteri pada pasien anak di RSPI Prof. Dr. Sulianti Saroso tahun 2018. Variabel konfounding dalam penelitian ini yaitu jenis kelamin (OR = 1.851) dan sosial ekonomi (OR = 1.923). Kesimpulan: status Imunisasi merupakan faktor risiko difteri pada anak. Saran: penyuluhan tentang pentingnya imunisasi lengkap kepada individu keluarga dan advokasi terhadap stakeholder dilakukan secara lebih optimal.
Legal events, one of which is the death of a person, will cause legal consequences on how to follow up the management of the rights and obligations of someone who has died. Islam teaches a set of shari’ah laws regarding inheritance and will. The Medan Religious Court had determined the compulsory heir but it was sued by another heir. On the other hand, based on the Decision of the Supreme Court Number: 485K/Ag/2013, the plaintiff was declared as the compulsory heir and decided that the defendants were not. This certainly can lead to legal uncertainty. Regarding to this case, the author discusses the settlement of will in inheritance dispute because it raises several problems regarding the factor of inheritance dispute, settlement of inheritance dispute, and implementation of the will. The research in this thesis applies a normative juridical method which is an approach through legal research by examining the principles of law and law comparison. Based on the research results, the conclusion that can be drawn is that the factor causing inheritance dispute is the determination of inheritance to adopted child. Settlement of inheritance dispute, against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 485K/Ag/2013, invalidates the determination of heirs and states that the Decision of the Religious Courts has no legal force. In addition, related to the settlement of the testament to the inheritance dispute against the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 485K/Ag/2013, the judge has determined to give a wasiyah waajibah (binding will) to the adopted child a maximum of 1/3 of the testator’s inheritance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.