Underwriters Laboratories 94 test
bars have been imaged with X-ray
K-edge tomography between 12 and 32 keV to assess the bromine and
antimony concentration gradient across char layers of partially burnt
samples. Phase contrast tomography on partially burnt samples showed
gas bubbles and dark-field scattering ascribed to residual blend inhomogeneity.
In addition, single-shot grating interferometry was used to record
X-ray movies of test samples during heating (IR and flame) intended
to mimic the UL 94 plastics flammability test. The UL 94 test bars
were formulated with varying concentrations of a brominated flame
retardant, Saytex 8010, and a synergist, Sb2O3, blended into high-impact polystyrene (HIPS). Depending on the sample
composition, samples will pass or fail the UL 94 plastics flammability
test. Tomography and interferometry imaging show differences that
correlate with UL 94 performance. Key features such as char layer,
gas bubble formation, microcracks, and dissolution of the flame retardant
in the char layer regions are used in understanding the efficiency
of the flame retardant and synergist. The samples that pass the UL
94 test have a thick, highly visible char layer as well as an interior
rich in gas bubbles. Growth of gas bubbles from flame-retardant thermal
decomposition is noted in the X-ray phase contrast movies. Also noteworthy
is an absence of bubbles near the burning surface of the polymer;
dark-field images after burning suggest a microcrack structure between
interior bubbles and the surface. The accepted mechanism for flame
retardant activity includes free radical quenching in the flame by
bromine and antimony species. The imaging supports this as well as
provides a fast inspection of other parameters, such as viscosity
and surface tension.
In this work, fire inhibition performance of four flame retardant formulations of brominated flame retardant (BFR: GreenArmor ®), antimony(III) oxide (Sb 2 O 3) and high impact polystyrene (HIPS) is reported. The standard Underwriters Laboratory (UL 94) vertical burn test was applied for assessing the flame retardancy of a variety of polymer blends. A formulation having 13.3 wt% GreenArmor ® , 4 wt% Sb 2 O 3 and 82.7 wt% HIPS, named sample D, successfully passed the flame test and was rated V-0. The other formulations with deficient composition exhibited low flame retardancy, as expected. The X-ray grating interferometry method is introduced for probing the 3D internal structures across the burnt UL 94 flame retarded polymer blend formulations to present the detailed mechanisms of flame retardancy. The X-ray images revealed several features for the formulation (sample D) that passed the UL 94 test: heat-induced dissolution of BFR and Sb 2 O 3 residual particles, formation of gas bubbles inside the burnt polymer test bar, deflation of gas bubbles in a char layer through a microcrack, and thick char layer development, defined by the Br and Sb concentration profile to a depth of 100 to 220 microns. Also, the X-ray images show clear differences between formulations that pass and fail the UL 94 test. X-ray grating interferometry imaging is proposed as a novel technique for assessment of new generation flame retardants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.