Monte Carlo simulations of the radiolysis of neutral liquid water and 0.4 M H(2)SO(4) aqueous solutions at ambient temperature are used to calculate the variations of the primary radical and molecular yields (at 10(-6)s) as a function of linear energy transfer (LET) in the range approximately 0.3 to 6.5 keV/micrometer. The early energy deposition is approximated by considering short (approximately 20-100 micrometer) high-energy (approximately 300-6.6 MeV) proton track segments, over which the LET remains essentially constant. The subsequent nonhomogeneous chemical evolution of the reactive species formed in these tracks is simulated by using the independent reaction times approximation, which has previously been used successfully to model the radiolysis of water under various conditions. The results obtained are in good general agreement with available experimental data over the whole LET range studied. After normalization of our computed yields relative to the standard radical and molecular yields for (60)Co gamma radiation (average LET approximately 0.3 keV/micrometer), we obtain empirical relationships of the primary radiolytic yields as a function of LET over the LET range studied. Such relationships are of practical interest since they allow us to predict a priori values of the radical and molecular yields for any radiation from the knowledge of the average LET of this radiation only. As an application, we determine the corresponding yields for the case of (137)Cs gamma radiation. For this purpose, we use the value of approximately 0.91 keV/micrometer for the average LET of (137)Cs gamma rays, chosen so that our calculated yield G(Fe(3+)) for ferrous-ion oxidation in air-saturated 0.4 M sulfuric acid reproduces the value of 15.3 molecules/100 eV for this radiation recommended by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. The uncertainty range on those primary radical and molecular yields are also determined knowing the experimental error (approximately 2%) for the measured G(Fe(3+)) value. The following values (expressed in molecules/100 eV) are obtained: (1) for neutral water: G(e(-)(aq)) = 2.50 +/- 0.16, G(H(.)) = 0.621 +/- 0.019, G(H(2)) = 0.474 +/- 0.025, G((.)OH) = 2.67 +/- 0.14, G(H(2)O(2)) = 0.713 +/- 0.031, and G(-H(2)O) = 4.08 +/- 0.22; and (2) for 0.4 M H(2)SO(4) aqueous solutions: G(H(.)) = 3.61 +/- 0.09, G(H(2)) = 0.420 +/- 0.019, G((.)OH) = 2.78 +/- 0.12, G(H(2)O(2)) = 0.839 +/- 0.037, and G(-H(2)O) = 4.46 +/- 0.16. These computed values are found to differ from the standard yields for (60)Co gamma rays by up to approximately 6%.
The influence of the energetic gap on the effective distance-decay rate of electronic coupling (beta(eff)) in DNA is investigated in the context of the superexchange mechanism. The DNA double helix is described by a tight-binding electronic Hamiltonian model, in which all orbitals have the same energy and interact with one another through an exponentially decaying function of distance. Our numerical results concerning the beta(eff) values obtained for two different DNA molecules are analyzed within the theoretical framework of the "continuous-medium approximation," previously developed by Lopez-Castillo et al. (J.-M. Lopez-Castillo, A. Filali-Mouhim, I.L. Plante, and J.-P. Jay-Gerin. J. Phys. Chem. 99 : 6864-6875, 1995). We find that the intervening DNA bridge between the donor and acceptor sites is defined by a unique dimensionless control parameter gamma/E, where E is the energy of the orbitals of this medium with respect to those of the redox site orbitals (energetic gap) and gamma is the electronic band width of the bridge considered as a continuous medium. In the narrow-band regime, our "through-space" coupling model predicts beta(eff) values that are in good order of magnitude agreement with those calculated by other theoretical approaches as well as with those obtained from experiment. Moreover, under equivalent energetic conditions, the DNA-mediated transfers of holes and electrons differ considerably. This difference depends upon the sign of the parameter gamma/E.
The influence of the energetic gap on the effective distance-decay rate of electronic coupling (beta(eff)) in DNA is investigated in the context of the superexchange mechanism. The DNA double helix is described by a tight-binding electronic Hamiltonian model, in which all orbitals have the same energy and interact with one another through an exponentially decaying function of distance. Our numerical results concerning the beta(eff) values obtained for two different DNA molecules are analyzed within the theoretical framework of the "continuous-medium approximation," previously developed by Lopez-Castillo et al. (J.-M. Lopez-Castillo, A. Filali-Mouhim, I.L. Plante, and J.-P. Jay-Gerin. J. Phys. Chem. 99 : 6864-6875, 1995). We find that the intervening DNA bridge between the donor and acceptor sites is defined by a unique dimensionless control parameter gamma/E, where E is the energy of the orbitals of this medium with respect to those of the redox site orbitals (energetic gap) and gamma is the electronic band width of the bridge considered as a continuous medium. In the narrow-band regime, our "through-space" coupling model predicts beta(eff) values that are in good order of magnitude agreement with those calculated by other theoretical approaches as well as with those obtained from experiment. Moreover, under equivalent energetic conditions, the DNA-mediated transfers of holes and electrons differ considerably. This difference depends upon the sign of the parameter gamma/E.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.