Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive effect of preoperative CEA and CA 19-9 levels on the prognosis of colorectal and gastric cancer patients. Materials and Methods: CEA and CA 19-9 were evaluated preoperatively in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (n=116) and gastric cancer (n=49). Patients with CEA levels <5 ng/mL were classified as CEA Group 1, 5-30 ng/mL as CEA Group 2 and >30 ng/ mL were classified as CEA Group 3. Similarly the patients with a CA 19-9 level <35 U/mL were classified as CA 19-9 Group 1, with 35-100 U/mL as Group 2 and with >100 U/mL as Group and 3. TNM stages and histologic grades were noted according to histopathological reports. Patients with a TNM grade 0 or 1 were classified as Group A, TNM grade 2 patients constituted Group B and TNM grade 3 and 4 patients constituted Group C. Demographic characteristics, tumor locations and blood types of the patients were all recorded and these data were compared with the preoperative CEA and CA19-9 values. Results: A significant correlation between CA 19-9 levels (>100 U/mL) and TNM stage (in advanced stages) was determined. We also determined a significant correlation between TNM stages and positive vlaues for both CEA and CA 19-9 in colorectal and gastric cancer patients. In comparison between CEA and CA 19-9 levels and age, gender, tumor location, ABO blood group, and tumor histologic grade, no significant correlation was found. Conclusions: Positive levels of both CEA and CA 19-9 can be considered to indicate an advanced stage in colorectal and gastric cancer patients.

Background: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the main leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for about 85% of lung cancer diagnoses and more than 50% of all lung cancer cases are diagnosed at an advanced stage; hence have poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to diagnose NSCLC patients reliably and as early as possible in order to reduce the risk of mortality.Methods: We identified blood-based gene markers for early NSCLC by performing a multi-omics approach utilizing integrated analysis of global gene expression and copy number alterations of NSCLC patients using array-based techniques. We also validated the diagnostic and the prognostic potential of the gene signature using independent datasets with detailed clinical information.Results: We identified 12 genes that are significantly expressed in NSCLC patients’ blood, at the earliest stages of the disease, and associated with a poor disease outcome. We then validated 12-gene signature’s diagnostic and prognostic value using independent datasets of gene expression profiling of over 1000 NSCLC patients. Indeed, 12-gene signature predicted disease outcome independently of other clinical factors in multivariate regression analysis (HR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.72–4.07; p = 1.3 × 10−8). Significantly altered functions, pathways, and gene networks revealed alterations in several key genes and cancer-related pathways that may have importance for NSCLC transformation, including FAM83A, ZNF696, UBE2C, RECK, TIMM50, GEMIN7, and XPO5.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that integrated genomic and network analyses may provide a reliable approach to identify genes that are associated with NSCLC, and lead to improved diagnosis detecting the disease in early stages in patients’ blood instead of using invasive techniques and also have prognostic potential for discriminating high-risk patients from the low-risk ones.

Objective: Gastric cancer is among the most common human cancers with high mortality rates. ADAM10, a member of the ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) family has also been found to be associated with gastric carcinoma and has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target. Here, we investigated the association of ADAM10 expression with prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma patients that underwent gastric resection with D2 lymph node dissection. Methods: Total 86 consecutive patients that underwent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma were included. Immunohistochemical ADAM10 expression and its association with clinicopathological parameters were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses and survival analyses were performed using SPSS ver.22. Results: High grade tumors, advanced stage tumors and diffuse type tumors showed significantly worse prognosis. A statistically significant association between ADAM10 expression and overall survival (OS) was observed in the univariate analysis, however, this association did not maintain its significance in the multivariate analysis. No statistically significant association was found ADAM-10 expression and clinicopathological parameters. Conclusion: Immunohistochemical ADAM10 expression may be used as a prognostic marker in gastric adenocarcinoma, however, introduction of a standardized immunohistochemical scoring system seems to be necessary for evaluation of ADAM10 staining. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3613 How to cite this:Alakus H, Kaya M, Ozer H, Egilmez HR, Karadayi K. ADAM10 expression in gastric adenocarcinoma: Results of a curative gastrectomy cohort. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3613 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The MSI scoring systems, MsPath, and PathScore, are reliable systems and effectively correlated with BG for predicting patients who need advanced analysis techniques because of the risk of HNPCC.

No abstract