Introduction
COVID-19 is a pandemic that affected humans’ lives and activities through the year 2020 in a way that was not witnessed in recent years. Many governments declared a complete lockdown as a try to stop the transmission of the disease. This lockdown resulted in a good recovery in environmental health, where air pollutants levels dramatically decreased.
Theory
There are two relations between air pollution and COVID-19, one is before the disease spread, and the other is after. Before the disease spread, many areas had high levels of contaminants in the air due to industrial activities, transportation, and human density. These areas had the highest infection rates and death cases. This could be attributed to two reasons, the aerosol could help to spread the virus at a higher rate, and air pollutants could negatively affect peoples’ lungs, which assisted the virus in attacking the patients brutally.
Results
After the disease spread, the lockdown that was applied in the major industrial countries led to a decrease in the pollutants levels and an increase in the ozone level in the air. This lockdown improved the air quality worldwide to a level that all political conferences and agreements could not reach. In this review, we are showing the impact of COVID-19 on air pollutants in different countries.
Summary
This paper provides information about pollutants' influence on human and environmental health that other researchers obtained in different areas of the globe before and after the pandemic. This could give ideas about the impact of humans on the environment and the possible ways of recovering the environment's health.
In this work, the feasibility of using a hybrid forward osmosis (FO)−membrane distillation (MD) process for treating hypersaline produced water was studied. Four draw solutions [i.e., sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl), lithium chloride (LiCl), and magnesium chloride (MgCl 2 )] at concentrations near to their saturation limits were considered. LiCl manifested relatively high FO flux due to its high osmotic pressure (about 1600 atm at 10 M). However, the MD water flux for the 10 M LiCl was relatively low due to the low vapor pressure. NaCl and KCl showed a different behavior of a high MD flux and low or negative FO flux. MgCl 2 at a concentration of 4.8 M showed comparable fluxes for both FO and MD. This work has demonstrated that the FO−MD process has the ability to treat extremely saline solutions that contain hydrocarbons and to produce high-purity water.
Abstract. The forward osmosis (FO) process has been considered to be a viable option for water desalination in comparison to the traditional processes like reverse
osmosis, regarding energy consumption and economical operation. In this
work, a polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber support layer was prepared using the electrospinning process as a modern method. Then, an interfacial
polymerization reaction between m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) was carried out to generate a polyamide selective thin-film composite (TFC) membrane on the support layer. The TFC membrane was tested
in FO mode (feed solution facing the active layer) using the standard
methodology and compared to a commercially available cellulose triacetate
membrane (CTA). The synthesized membrane showed a high performance in terms
of water flux (16 Lm −2 h−1) but traded the salt rejection (4 gm−2 h−1) compared with the commercial CTA membrane (water flux = 13 Lm−2 h−1 and salt rejection = 3 gm−2 h−1) at
no applied pressure and room temperature. Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM), contact angle, mechanical properties, porosity, and performance
characterizations were conducted to examine the membrane.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.