18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (PET/CT) is the current state-of-the-art in the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and has a high sensitivity for extranodal involvement. Therefore, reassessment of extranodal involvement and the current prognostic indices in the PET/CT era is warranted. We screened patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL seen at the academic centers of Aalborg, Copenhagen, and British Columbia for eligibility. Patients that had been staged with PET/CT and treated with R-CHOP(-like) 1 st line treatment were retrospectively included. In total 443 patients met the inclusion criteria. With a median follow-up of 2.4 years, the 3-year overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 73% and 69%, respectively. The Ann Arbor classification had no prognostic impact in itself with the exception of stage IV disease (HR 2.14 for PFS, P<0.01). Extranodal involvement was associated with a worse outcome in general, and in particular for patients with involvement of >2 extranodal sites, including HR 7.81 (P < 0.001) for PFS for >3 sites. Bone/bone marrow involvement was the most commonly involved extranodal site identified by PET/CT (29%) and was associated with an inferior PFS and OS. The IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI were predictive of PFS and OS, and the two latter could identify a very good prognostic subgroup with 3-year PFS and OS of 100%. PET/CT-ascertained extranodal involvement in DLBCL is common and involvement of >2 extranodal sites is associated with a dismal outcome. The IPI, R-IPI, and NCCN-IPI predict outcome with high accuracy.

In patients with DLBCL, staging PET/CT can miss BM involvement with concordant DLBCL (less common) or discordant iNHL (more common). Routine BMB does not add relevant diagnostic or prognostic value over PET/CT alone in the majority of patients with DLBCL.

In advanced-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the presence of an activated B-cell phenotype or a non–germinal center (GCB) phenotype, coexpression of MYC and BCL2 by immunohistochemistry, and the cooccurrence of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 rearrangements are associated with inferior outcomes. It is unclear whether these variables remain prognostic in stage I/II patients. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the prognostic impact of cell of origin (COO), as well as dual-expressor (DE) status and molecular double-hit (DH) status, in stage I/II DLBCL by positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT). A total of 211 patients treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone)–like regimens, with or without radiotherapy, was included. The median follow-up in the entire cohort was 4 years (range, 0.4-9.4), with estimated 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-89) and 88% (95% CI, 83-92), respectively. By univariable analysis, DE (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.58-2.81, P = .55 and OS: HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.60-3.30; P = .44), DH (PFS: HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.27-5.31; P = .80 and OS: HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.08-4.73; P = .64), and non-GCB status (PFS: HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.83-3.03; P = .16 and OS: HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.89-3.67; P = .10) were associated with poorer outcomes. In patients with PET-CT–defined stage I/II DLBCL treated with R-CHOP–like therapy, with or without radiation, COO and DE and DH status were not significantly associated with inferior PFS or OS.

No abstract

The natural history of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is variable. The Revised International Prognostic Score (IPSS-R) is commonly used in practice to predict outcomes in patients with MDS at both diagnosis and before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the effect of change in the IPSS-R before allogeneic HSCT with chemotherapy or hypomethylating agents on post-transplantation outcomes is currently unknown. We assessed whether improvement in IPSS-R prognostic score pre-HSCT would result in improvement in clinical outcomes post-HSCT. Secondary goals included studying the effect of prognostic factors on post-transplantation survival. All patients with MDS who underwent allogeneic HSCT at the Leukemia/BMT Program of British Columbia between February 1997 and April 2013 were included. Pertinent information was reviewed from the program database. IPSS-R was calculated based on data from the time of MDS diagnosis and before HSCT. Outcomes of patients who had improved IPSS-R pre-HSCT were compared with those with stable or worse IPSS-R. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with P values determined using the log-rank test. Hazard ratios were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models to study the effects of the prognostic variables on OS and EFS. A total of 138 consecutive patients were included. IPSS-R improved in 62 of these patients (45%), worsened in 23 (17%), remained stable in 41 (30%), and was unknown in 12 (9%). OS was not statistically different across the improved, worsened, and stable groups (30% versus 22% versus 40%, respectively; P = .63). The cumulative incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality at 5 years were 28.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1 to 36.1) and 31.6% (95% CI, 23.8 to 39.7), respectively. The rate of relapse was 23% in patients with <5% blasts at the time of HSCT, 69% in those with 5% to 20% blasts, and 66% in those with >20% blasts (P = .0004). In the entire cohort OS was 34% and EFS was 33%. There was no significant difference in outcomes between patients who received myeloablative conditioning and those who received nonmyeloablative conditioning before HSCT (OS, 34% and 39%, respectively; P = .63 and EFS, 34% and 32%, respectively; P = .86). OS was not statistically different among patients with improved, worsened, or stable IPSS-R. On multivariate analysis, only 3 factors were associated with OS: cytogenetic risk group at diagnosis, blast count at transplantation, and the presence or absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Improving IPSS-R before HSCT does not translate into better survival outcomes. Blast count pretransplantation was highly predictive of post-transplantation outcomes.

BackgroundPost-acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) syndrome, also known as long COVID, is a prolonged illness after the acute phase of COVID-19. Hospitalized patients were known to have persisting symptoms of fatigue, headache, dyspnea, and anosmia. There is a need to describe the characteristics of individuals with post-COVID-19 symptoms in comparison to the baseline characteristics.PurposeTo investigate the clinical and biochemical characteristics of people who recovered from COVID-19 after 6 months of discharge from the hospital.MethodsThis was a prospective follow-up investigation of hospitalized and discharged COVID-19 patients. Adult patients admitted to King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and discharged were recruited. The baseline demographic information, comorbidities, vital signs and symptoms, laboratory parameters, COVID-19 therapy, and outcomes were collected from the medical records. Blood samples were collected for cytokines estimation. A detailed interview about signs and symptoms was undertaken during the follow-up.ResultsHalf of the followed-up people reported experiencing at least one of the COVID-19-related symptoms. The mean blood pressure was found higher in follow-up. People with the symptoms were characterized by low lymphocyte count, lower serum calcium levels, and hyperglycemia compared to people without any post-COVID-19 symptoms. Cytokines IL-8, VEGF, and MCP-1 were higher in people with the most frequent symptoms.ConclusionPeople with post-COVID-19 symptoms were characterized by lower lymphocyte count, lower serum calcium levels, and hyperglycemia compared to people without symptoms. Individuals with the most frequent post-COVID-19 symptoms had higher baseline pro-inflammatory, chemotactic, and angiogenic cytokines.

Background COVID-19 is diagnosed using RT-PCR assays of samples from nasal and oropharyngeal swabs. People with negative RT-PCR often presented with clinical manifestations of COVID-19. The data on such patients are lacking. The present study aims to characterize the patients who were suspected COVID-19 cases and tested negative in RT-PCR compared to patients who had been tested RT-PCR positive. Methods This is a retrospective, observational study of adult suspected and confirmed patients of COVID-19 admitted to King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1st March 2020 until 30th November 2020. Laboratory confirmation is done through nasal/pharyngeal swab specimens, tested positive in RT-PCR assay. Patients with initial negative RT-PCR test results were assessed again within 48-72 h to avoid false-negative results. Patient data were extracted from the electronic medical files of each included patient using a predesigned case report form. Results The study included 488 (80.93%) patients with RT-PCR swab results positive, and 115 (19.07%) patients who were negative. Respiratory rate and diastolic blood pressure were higher among the swab-positive cases. More number of swab-negative patients had comorbidities such as coronary heart disease, chronic kidney disease, and carcinoma. Fever, cough, and shortness of breath were reported higher among the swab-positive cases. ALT and AST, and LDH levels were found higher among RT-PCR-positive patients. Serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and troponin were more elevated in RT-PCR-negative patients. Antibiotics, anticoagulants, and corticosteroids were used more by swab-positive patients. Significantly higher number of RT-PCR-positive patients required proning, high-flow nasal cannula, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation. Acute cardiac ischemia and death were found to be similar among the patients. However, deaths occurred significantly earlier among the swab-positive cases when compared to the swab-negative group. Conclusion Distinctive symptoms and markers of COVID-19 are more frequent among patients who had RT-PCR-positive results.

ObjectiveThe aim of this paper is to present the AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance (AIDA) international Registry dedicated to Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic (VEXAS) syndrome, describing its design, construction, and modalities of dissemination.MethodsThis Registry is a clinical, physician-driven, population- and electronic-based instrument designed for the retrospective and prospective collection of real-life data. Data gathering is based on the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool and is intended to obtain real-world evidence for daily patients' management. The Registry may potentially communicate with other on-line tools dedicated to VEXAS syndrome, thus enhancing international collaboration and data sharing for research purposes. The Registry is practical enough to be easily modified to meet future needs regarding VEXAS syndrome.ResultsTo date (April 22nd, 2022), 113 Centers from 23 Countries in 4 continents have been involved; 324 users (114 Principal Investigators, 205 Site Investigators, 2 Lead Investigators, and 3 data managers) are currently able to access the registry for data entry (or data sharing) and collection. The Registry includes 4,952 fields organized into 18 instruments designed to fully describe patient's details about demographics, clinical manifestations, symptoms, histologic details about skin and bone marrow biopsies and aspirate, laboratory features, complications, comorbidities, therapies, and healthcare access.ConclusionThis international Registry for patients with VEXAS syndrome will allow the achievement of a comprehensive knowledge about this new disease, with the final goal to obtain real-world evidence for daily clinical practice, especially in relation to the comprehension of this disease about the natural history and the possible therapeutic approaches. This Project can be found on https://clinicaltrials.gov NCT05200715.