ObjectiveTo compare mechanical properties of intact feline medial collateral ligaments and three techniques for treatment of feline medial tarsal instability.Study designControlled laboratory study.Sample populationForty‐eight normal, adult feline tarsi.MethodsThree repairs were tested: a bone tunnel with polypropylene (PP) suture, a bone tunnel with polyethylene (PE) cord, and a knotless anchor technique with PE cord. A cyclic (6‐N preload; 5‐N amplitude; 2‐Hz frequency) tensile test (600 cycles) was performed on feline tarsi with either the long or the short medial tarsal ligament intact, with each reconstruction technique followed by a single‐cycle load‐to‐failure test (0.5 mm/s) with a failure point at 2 mm of displacement. Total elongation, peak‐to‐peak elongation, stiffness, and maximum load to failure point were compared with the intact condition.ResultsNo differences in stiffness, total elongation, or peak‐to‐peak elongation were found between specimens repaired with the knotless technique and intact controls (P > .04), whereas tarsi repaired with the tunnel technique and PP were weaker (P < .008). Total and conditioning elongation were greater after tunnel reconstruction with PP than after knotless reconstruction (P = .005). Mean load to 2 mm of displacement tended (P = .03) to be higher after knotless than after knotted PP repairs and did not differ (P = .47) between tarsi repaired with the tunnel or anchor repairs with PE.ConclusionThe mechanical properties of intact tarsi were superior to those of tarsi repaired with tunnel techniques and PP but were similar to those of tarsi repaired with knotless techniques with PE.Clinical significanceFeline tarsal stabilization with the knotless technique for tarsal medial collateral ligament insufficiency may reduce the requirement for or duration of postoperative coaptation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.