Purpose: To investigate the efficiency of a new method (TT-Upslope) for transit time (Dt) estimation from cardiovascular MR (CMR) velocity curves. Materials and Methods:Fifty healthy volunteers (40 6 15 years) underwent applanation tonometry to estimate carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) and carotid pressure measurements, and CMR to estimate aortic arch-PWV and ascending aorta distensibility (AAD). The Dt was calculated with TT-Upslope by minimizing the area delimited by two sigmoid curves fitted to the systolic upslope of the ascending (AAC) and descending (DAC) aorta velocity curves, and compared with previously described methods: TT-Point using the half maximum of AAC and DAC, TT-Foot using AAC and DAC feet, and TTWave by minimizing the area between AAC and DAC curves using cross correlation. Conclusion: Arch-PWV estimated with CMR using the TT-Upslope method was found to be reproducible and accurate, providing strong correlations with age and aortic stiffness indices.
Purpose: To assess if segmentation of the aorta can be accurately achieved using the modulus image of phase contrast (PC) magnetic resonance (MR) acquisitions.Materials and Methods: PC image sequences containing both the ascending and descending aorta of 52 subjects were acquired using three different MR scanners. An automated segmentation technique, based on a 2Dþt deformable surface that takes into account the features of PC aortic images, such as flow-related effects, was developed. The study was designed to: 1) assess the variability of our approach and its robustness to the type of MR scanner, and 2) determine its sensitivity to aortic dilation and its accuracy against an expert manual tracing.Results: Interobserver variability in the lumen area was 0.59 6 0.92% for the automated approach versus 10.09 6 8.29% for manual segmentation. The mean Dice overlap measure was 0.945 6 0.014. The method was robust to the aortic size and highly correlated (r ¼ 0.99) with the manual tracing in terms of aortic area and diameter.Conclusion: A fast and robust automated segmentation of the aortic lumen was developed and successfully tested on images provided by various MR scanners and acquired on healthy volunteers as well as on patients with a dilated aorta.
BackgroundEarly detection of diastolic dysfunction is crucial for patients with incipient heart failure. Although this evaluation could be performed from phase-contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data, its usefulness in clinical routine is not yet established, mainly because the interpretation of such data remains mostly based on manual post-processing. Accordingly, our goal was to develop a robust process to automatically estimate velocity and flow rate-related diastolic parameters from PC-CMR data and to test the consistency of these parameters against echocardiography as well as their ability to characterize left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction.ResultsWe studied 35 controls and 18 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and preserved LV ejection fraction who had PC-CMR and Doppler echocardiography exams on the same day. PC-CMR mitral flow and myocardial velocity data were analyzed using custom software for semi-automated extraction of diastolic parameters. Inter-operator reproducibility of flow pattern segmentation and functional parameters was assessed on a sub-group of 30 subjects. The mean percentage of overlap between the transmitral flow segmentations performed by two independent operators was 99.7 ± 1.6%, resulting in a small variability (<1.96 ± 2.95%) in functional parameter measurement. For maximal myocardial longitudinal velocities, the inter-operator variability was 4.25 ± 5.89%. The MR diastolic parameters varied significantly in patients as opposed to controls (p < 0.0002). Both velocity and flow rate diastolic parameters were consistent with echocardiographic values (r > 0.71) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed their ability to separate patients from controls, with sensitivity > 0.80, specificity > 0.80 and accuracy > 0.85. Slight superiority in terms of correlation with echocardiography (r = 0.81) and accuracy to detect LV abnormalities (sensitivity > 0.83, specificity > 0.91 and accuracy > 0.89) was found for the PC-CMR flow-rate related parameters.ConclusionsA fast and reproducible technique for flow and myocardial PC-CMR data analysis was successfully used on controls and patients to extract consistent velocity-related diastolic parameters, as well as flow rate-related parameters. This technique provides a valuable addition to established CMR tools in the evaluation and the management of patients with diastolic dysfunction.
BackgroundArterial stiffness is considered as an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality, and is increasingly used in clinical practice. This study aimed at evaluating the consistency of the automated estimation of regional and local aortic stiffness indices from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) data.ResultsForty-six healthy subjects underwent carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements (CF_PWV) by applanation tonometry and CMR with steady-state free-precession and phase contrast acquisitions at the level of the aortic arch. These data were used for the automated evaluation of the aortic arch pulse wave velocity (Arch_PWV), and the ascending aorta distensibility (AA_Distc, AA_Distb), which were estimated from ascending aorta strain (AA_Strain) combined with either carotid or brachial pulse pressure. The local ascending aorta pulse wave velocity AA_PWVc and AA_PWVb were estimated respectively from these carotid and brachial derived distensibility indices according to the Bramwell-Hill theoretical model, and were compared with the Arch_PWV. In addition, a reproducibility analysis of AA_PWV measurement and its comparison with the standard CF_PWV was performed. Characterization according to the Bramwell-Hill equation resulted in good correlations between Arch_PWV and both local distensibility indices AA_Distc (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) and AA_Distb (r = 0.60, p < 0.001); and between Arch_PWV and both theoretical local indices AA_PWVc (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and AA_PWVb (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the Arch_PWV was well related to CF_PWV (r = 0.69, p < 0.001) and its estimation was highly reproducible (inter-operator variability: 7.1%).ConclusionsThe present work confirmed the consistency and robustness of the regional index Arch_PWV and the local indices AA_Distc and AA_Distb according to the theoretical model, as well as to the well established measurement of CF_PWV, demonstrating the relevance of the regional and local CMR indices.
Despite high elasticity values in classic PTC variants, conventional SWE indexes failed to discriminate between benign and malignant tumors in thyroid nodules with IC.
The aim of this study is to quantify aortic backward flow (BF) using phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (PC-CMR) and to study its associations with age, indexes of arterial stiffness, and geometry. Although PC-CMR blood flow studies showed a simultaneous presence of BF and forward flow (FF) in the ascending aorta (AA), the relationship between aortic flows and aging as well as arterial stiffness and geometry in healthy volunteers has never been reported. We studied 96 healthy subjects [47 women, 39 ± 15 yr old (19-79 yr)]. Aortic stiffness [arch pulse wave velocity (PWVAO), AA distensibility], geometry (AA diameter and arch length), and parameters related to AA BF and FF (volumes, peaks, and onset times) were estimated from CMR. Applanation tonometry carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity (PWVCF), carotid augmentation index, and time to return of the reflected pressure wave were assessed. Whereas FF parameters remained unchanged, BF onset time shortened significantly (R(2) = 0.18, P < 0.0001) and BF volume and BF-to-FF peaks ratio increased significantly (R(2) = 0.38 and R(2) = 0.44, respectively, P < 0.0001) with aging. These two latter BF indexes were also related to stiffness indexes (PWVCF, R(2) > 0.30; PWVAO, R(2) > 0.24; and distensibility, R(2) > 0.20, P < 0.001), augmentation index (R(2) > 0.20, P < 0.001), and aortic geometry (AA diameter, R(2) > 0.58; and arch length, R(2) > 0.31, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, aortic diameter was the strongest independent correlate of BF beyond age effect. In conclusion, AA BF estimated using PC-CMR increased significantly in terms of magnitude and volume and appeared earlier with aging and was mostly determined by aortic geometry. Thus BF indexes could be relevant markers of subclinical arterial wall alterations.
Abstract-A statistical methodology is proposed to rank several estimation methods of a relevant clinical parameter when no gold standard is available. Based on a regression without truth method, the proposed approach was appliedtorankeightmethodswithout using any ap riori information regarding the reliability of each method and its degree of automation. It was only based on a prior concerning the statistical distribution of the parameter of interest in the database. The ranking of the methods relies on figures of merit derived from the regression and computed using a bootstrap process. The methodology was applied to the estimation of the left ventricular ejection fraction derived from cardiac magnetic resonance images segmented using eight approaches with different degrees of automation: three segmentations were entirely manually performed and the others were variously automated. The ranking of methods was consistent with the expected performance of the estimation methods: the most accurate estimates of the *J. Lebenberg is with the LIF, INSERM UMR_S 678, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75013 Paris, France, and also with the PRIAM, ESME-Sudria, 94200 Ivry-sur-Seine, France (e-mail: jessica.lebenberg@gmail.com).C. Constantinidès is with the LIF, INSERM UMR_S 678, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75013 Paris, France, and also with the PRIAM, ESME-Sudria, 94200 Ivry-sur-Seine, France.A .d eC e s a r e ,M .L e f o r t ,a n dF .F r o u i na r ew i t ht h eL I F ,I N S E R M UMR_S
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.