Over the past 2 weeks numerous states have announced a major shift in coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination programs-from a textured approach that includes individual risk factors for morbidity and mortality (eg, age and highrisk medical conditions), occupational risk factors for exposure (eg, first responders and correctional officers), and other societal priorities (eg, essential workers such as teachers, grocery store employees, and public transportation workers) to an approach focused on vaccinating all individuals aged 65 years and older. Concerns have been raised that the more detailed approach has been difficult to implement, thus slowing the rollout of vaccines, and may leave decisions regarding who gets vaccinated to people not adequately trained to make such a decision.Prioritizing all individuals aged 65 and older in the US, about 55 million people, 1 who account for approximately 80% of the deaths from COVID-19, 2 seems straightforward and an effective way to reduce the number of deaths in the US. However, if this approach is adopted without explicit attention to promoting health equity, it will, once again, exacerbate major health disparities. Why? Because, in most cases thus far, the process of making an appointment to be vaccinated requires substantial time, technology, and trust-3 resources that are unequally distributed in much of the US population. A rapid digital connection, the time to repeatedly refresh the link to the appointment site or hold on the phone for hours, the ability to travel to a vaccination site, often by car, and trust in the safety and efficacy of the vaccine are factors that make it more likely for a person to seek and obtain a COVID-19 vaccine. Many people who have tried to sign up to receive a vaccine in the past week have found it time-consuming and frustrating, with few if any appointments available. At the same time, many people who are at highest risk for severe illness and death from have not yet sought out the vaccine due to lack of awareness, barriers to vaccine access, or concerns about the vaccine.The health disparities laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic have not been surprising in their direction. Likewise, the inequities that are likely to manifest when a limited supply of vaccine is rolled out to a large number of eligible individuals are predictable. As local communities roll out vaccine distribution to those aged 65 and older it is important to consider potential challenges and to proactively plan for ways to mitigate likely disparities.

PURPOSE More effective strategies are needed to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening, particularly among the poor, racial and ethnic minorities, and individuals with limited English profi ciency. We examined whether the direct mailing of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) kits to patients overdue for such screening is an effective way to improve screening in this population. METHODSAll adults aged 50 to 80 years who did not have documentation of being up to date with colorectal cancer screening as of December 31, 2009, and who had had at least 2 visits to the community health center in the prior 18 months were randomized to the outreach intervention or usual care. Patients in the outreach group were mailed a colorectal cancer fact sheet and FOBT kit. Patients in the usual care group could be referred for screening during usual clinician visits. The primary outcome was completion of colorectal cancer screening (by FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy) 4 months after initiation of the outreach protocol. Outcome measures were compared using the Fisher exact test.RESULTS Analyses were based on 104 patients assigned to the outreach intervention and 98 patients assigned to usual care. In all, 30% of patients in the outreach group completed colorectal cancer screening during the study period, compared with 5% of patients in the usual care group (P <.001). Nearly all of the screenings were by FOBT. The groups did not differ signifi cantly with respect to the percentage of patients making a clinician visit or the percentage for whom a clinician placed an order for a screening test. CONCLUSIONSThe mailing of FOBT kits directly to patients was effi cacious for promoting colorectal cancer screening among a population with high levels of poverty, limited English profi ciency, and racial and ethnic diversity. Non-visit-based outreach to patients may be an important strategy to address suboptimal rates of colorectal cancer screening among populations most at risk for not being screened. Appropriate screening and early detection can greatly reduce colorectal cancer-associated morbidity and mortality, and several national guidelines recommend regular screening for colorectal cancer among adults aged 50 years and older with high-sensitivity fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy.2-4 Nearly one-half of eligible adults are not up to date on colorectal cancer screening, however. 5Moreover, despite overall improvements in the rate of colorectal cancer screening, marked disparities persist, with lower rates of colorectal cancer screening among racial and ethnic minorities, individuals with lower income or lower educational attainment, the uninsured, and individuals Muriel Jean-Jacques, MD The direct mailing of FOBT kits to patients who are due for colorectal cancer screening has been shown to be both clinically effective 9-14 and cost-effective 15,16 for increasing colorectal cancer screening rates. The vast majority of studies assessing the effi cacy of this strategy have not included sizable...

BACKGROUND: Despite well-established programs, influenza vaccination rates in U.S. adults are well below federal benchmarks and exhibit well-documented, persistent racial and ethnic disparities. The causes of these disparities are multifactorial and complex, though perceived racial/ethnic discrimination in healthcare is one hypothesized mechanism. OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of perceived discrimination in healthcare in mediating influenza vaccination disparities in chronically-ill U.S. adults (at high-risk for influenza-related complications). RESEARCH DESIGN: We utilized 2011–2012 data from the Aligning Forces for Quality Consumer Survey on health and healthcare (n=8,127), nationally-representative of chronically-ill U.S. adults. Logistic regression marginal effects examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and influenza vaccination, both unadjusted and in multivariate models adjusted for determinants of health service use. We then used binary mediation analysis to calculate and test the significance of the percentage of this relationship mediated by perceived discrimination in healthcare. RESULTS: Respondents reporting perceived discrimination in healthcare had half the uptake as those without discrimination (32% vs. 60%, p=0.009). The change in predicted probability of vaccination given perceived discrimination experiences (vs. none) was large but not significant in the fully-adjusted model (−0.185, 95% CI: −0.385, 0.014). Perceived discrimination significantly mediated 16% of the unadjusted association between race/ethnicity and influenza vaccination, though this dropped to 6% and lost statistical significance in multivariate models. CONCLUSIONS: The causes of persistent racial/ethnic disparities are complex and a single explanation is unlikely to be sufficient. We suggest re-evaluation in a larger cohort as well as potential directions for future research.

T he risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) can be greatly reduced through lifestyle and medical therapies that address diet, overweight and obesity, smoking, dysplipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Irrespective of which factors are contributing on an individual's risk for the development of CVD, treatment with statins safely and effectively reduces morbidity and mortality from CVD. 1,2The recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol treatment guideline emphasizes identifying and treating individuals at risk for developing CVD. 3 However, fewer than half of high-risk individuals are treated with statins. 4,5 Statin use is lower among blacks, 4,6 Hispanics, 5,6 the uninsured, 7 and poorer individuals. 8,9 Reducing the population burden of CVD and decreasing disparities will require maximizing the use of preventive strategies among all individuals likely to benefit from them.Statins may be underused for primary prevention for several reasons. Clinicians and patients may not readily appreciate increased CVD risk, particularly when risk comes from factors other than elevated cholesterol. 10,11 Patients may also Background-Many eligible primary cardiovascular disease prevention candidates are not treated with statins. Electronic health record data can identify patients with increased cardiovascular disease risk. Methods and Results-We performed a pragmatic randomized controlled trial at community health centers in 2 states.Participants were men aged ≥35 years and women ≥45 years, without cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus, and with a 10-year risk of coronary heart disease of at least 10%. The intervention group received telephone and mailed outreach, individualized based on patients' cardiovascular disease risk and uncontrolled risk factors, provided by lay health workers. Main outcomes included: documented discussion of medication treatment for cholesterol with a primary care clinician, receipt of statin prescription within 6 months, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol repeated and at least 30 mg/dL lower than baseline within 1 year. Six hundred forty-six participants (328 and 318 in the intervention and control groups, respectively) were included. At 6 months, 26.8% of intervention and 11.6% of control patients had discussed cholesterol treatment with a primary care clinician (odds ratio, 2.79; [95% confidence interval, 2.25-3.46]). Statin prescribing occurred for 10.1% in the intervention group and 6.0% in the control group (odds ratio, [12][13][14] Outreach interventions focused on addressing this risk could increase the number of high-risk patients who seek out treatment. 15Implementing population health management strategies in settings that serve large numbers of patients from low income and minority populations may be an effective way to reduce disparities. 16,17 In addition, testing strategies in safety net settings will help ensure that the study findings are applicable to low income and minority populations.We hypothesized that m...

Purpose Medical training has traditionally focused on the proximate determinants of disease, with little focus on how social conditions influence health. The authors conducted a scoping review of existing curricula to understand the current programs designed to teach primary care residents about the social determinants of health (SDH). Method In January and March 2017, the authors searched seven databases. Eligible articles focused on primary care residents, described a curriculum related to SDH, were published between January 2007 and January 2017, and were based in the United States. Results Of the initial 5,523 articles identified, 43 met study eligibility criteria. Most programs (29; 67%) were in internal medicine. Sixteen studies (37%) described the curriculum development process. Overall, 20 programs (47%) were short or one-time sessions, and 15 (35%) were longitudinal programs lasting at least 6 months. Thirty-two programs (74%) reported teaching SDH content using didactics, 22 (51%) incorporated experiential learning, and many programs (n = 38; 88%) employed both. Most studies reported satisfaction and/or self-perceived changes in knowledge or attitudes. Conclusions The authors identified wide variation in curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation. They highlight curricula that considered community and resident needs, used conceptual frameworks or engaged multiple stakeholders to select content, used multiple delivery methods, and focused evaluation on changes in skills or behaviors. This review highlights the need not only for systematic, standardized approaches to developing and delivering SDH curricula but also for developing rigorous evaluation of the curricula, particularly effects on resident behavior.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: Up to 60% of preventable mortality is attributable to social determinants of health (SDOH), yet training on SDOH competencies is not widely implemented in residency. The objective of this study was to assess internal and family medicine residents' competence at identifying and addressing SDOH. Methods: Residents' perceived competence at identifying, discussing, and addressing SDOH in outpatient settings was assessed using a single questionnaire administered in March 2017. In this cross-sectional analysis, bivariate associations of resident characteristics with the following outcomes were examined: identifying, discussing, and addressing patients' challenges related to SDOH through referrals. Results: The survey was completed by 129 (84%) residents. Twenty residents (16%) reported an annual income of less than $50,000 during childhood. Overall, 108 residents (84%) reported previous SDOH training. Two-thirds had outpatient practices in Veterans Affairs or safety-net clinics. Thirty-nine (30%) intended to pursue a career in primary care. The following numbers of residents reported high levels of competence for performing these outcomes: identifying patients' challenges related to SDOH: 37 (29%); discussing them with patients: 18 (14%); and addressing these challenges through referrals to internal and external resources: 13 (10%) and 11 (9%), respectively. Factors associated with higher competence included older age, lower childhood household income, prior education about SDOH, primary practice site and intention to practice primary care. Conclusions: Most residents had previous SDOH training, yet only a small proportion of residents reported being highly competent at identifying or addressing SDOH. Providing opportunities for practical training may be a key component in preparing medical residents to identify and address SDOH effectively in outpatient practice.