Background
Although remote dietary counselling practices have increased in the COVID‐19 pandemic, it is not known which method is more effective. This study aimed to determine the effect of diet counselling by phone or video on weight loss and to compare it with the traditional follow‐up method.
Methods
Forty‐six participants living with obesity were randomised into the phone counselling (
n
= 15), video counselling (
n
= 15), and traditional follow‐up groups (
n
= 16), and were followed for 10 weeks. The anthropometric measurements, quality‐of‐life questionnaire (SF‐36) scores and total calorie/macronutrient intakes were recorded and compared at baseline and at the end of the study.
Results
In the phone counselling, video counselling and traditional follow‐up groups body weight (−4.8 ± 0.9, −5.7 ± 1.8 and −3.3 ± 0.8 kg, respectively) and SF‐36 general health scores (14.2 ± 4.2, 15.9 ± 3.6 and 10.2 ± 3.7, respectively) of the participants changed significantly compared to baseline (group × time interaction,
p
< 0.05). The change in the body weight and SF‐36 general health score was more in the phone counselling and video counselling groups relative to the traditional follow‐up group (group × time interaction,
p
< 0.01). The highest decrease in total calorie (−301.4 ± 112.2 kcal) and carbohydrate (−26.6 ± 11.2 g) intake was in the video counselling group compared to the other groups (group × time interaction,
p
< 0.01).
Conclusion
Video counselling and phone counselling were effective in weight loss in the COVID‐19 pandemic. It is important to maintain remote dietary counselling practices to support weight management when face‐to‐face meetings are not possible.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.