Background. Abnormal muscle co-activation contributes to impairment after stroke. We developed a myoelectric computer interface (MyoCI) training paradigm to reduce abnormal co-activation. MyoCI provides intuitive feedback about muscle activation patterns, enabling decoupling of these muscles. Objective. To investigate tolerability and effects of MyoCI training of 3 muscle pairs on arm motor recovery after stroke, including effects of training dose and isometric versus movement-based training. Methods. We randomized chronic stroke survivors with moderate-to-severe arm impairment to 3 groups. Two groups tested different doses of isometric MyoCI (60 vs 90 minutes), and one group tested MyoCI without arm restraint (90 minutes), over 6 weeks. Primary outcome was arm impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment). Secondary outcomes included function, spasticity, and elbow range-of-motion at weeks 6 and 10. Results. Over all 32 subjects, MyoCI training of 3 muscle pairs significantly reduced impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) by 3.3 ± 0.6 and 3.1 ± 0.7 (P < 10 −4) at weeks 6 and 10, respectively. Each group improved significantly from baseline; no significant differences were seen between groups. Participants' lab-based and home-based function also improved at weeks 6 and 10 (P ≤ .01). Spasticity also decreased over all subjects, and elbow range-of-motion improved. Both moderately and severely impaired patients showed significant improvement. No participants had training-related adverse events. MyoCI reduced abnormal co-activation, which appeared to transfer to reaching in the movement group. Conclusions. MyoCI is a well-tolerated, novel rehabilitation tool that enables stroke survivors to reduce abnormal co-activation. It may reduce impairment and spasticity and improve arm function, even in severely impaired patients.
Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are an uncommon vascular anomaly that carry the risk of rupture and hemorrhage. Several factors have been implicated in the propensity of an AVM to bleed. One such factor is stenosis of AVM draining veins, as impairment of the AVM venous drainage system is associated with increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Currently, our understanding of the pathogenesis of AVM venous outf low stenosis is limited, as there is insufficient data on the blood flow patterns and local hemodynamic parameters of these draining veins.The angioarchitecture of AVMs features a nidus lacking a high resistance capillary network. Accordingly, our previous studies on AVM arterial feeders have demonstrated an abnormally high flow volume rate along with low pulsatility and resistance indices on quantitative magnetic resonance angiography. As such, AVM vessels endure high, non-physiologic levels of flow that may partially contribute to ectasia or stenosis depending on whether wall shear stress (WSS) is high or low, respectively.We hypothesize that AVM venous outflow stenosis occurs most commonly near the junction of the draining vein and the dural venous sinus. Increased flow volume rate through the AVM circuit coupled with the variation in compliance and rigidity between the walls of the draining vein and the dural venous sinus likely create turbulence of blood flow. The resulting flow separation, low WSS, and departure from axially aligned, unidirectional flow may create atherogenic conditions that can be implicated in venous intimal hyperplasia and outflow stenosis. We have previously found there to be a significant association between intimal hyperplagia risk factors and venous
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.