White society's reduced and otherized representation of the African American has always presented a challenge to African-American writers, historians, and intellectuals who wanted to write Black people into existence, present their repressed, excluded, or subordinated history, culture, and social milieu, and re-tell their many other stories. Frantz Fanon was a theorist who framed the issue of race in 'sociogenic' rather than 'biocentric' terms. His contribution lies in showing how such arbitrary constructs as 'White' and 'Black' predetermine our way of seeing but not truly seeing one another. When Blacks are seen solely in terms of racial stereotypes, they become "flat" images based only on ideologized 'epidermal inscriptions' whose actual humanity is denied, potentially leading to a lack of self-esteem and an 'inferiority complex.' This paper examines one of Amiri Baraka's famous plays, Dutchman (1967), from a Fanonian perspective to explore the troubled relationship between the colonizer (White) and the colonized (Black). In Dutchman, Baraka espoused his unapologetic blackness together with his determination to identify, call out, and wage a battle against racial injustices. Both Baraka and Fanon examine violence, sexual exploitation, and discrimination that Whites have perpetuated on blacks, and the two writers' intention was to awaken audiences and inspire change thereby ending the cycle of prejudice and discrimination against Blacks.
Literary criticism has long been concerned primarily with the analysis of human stories. When the natural environment has featured in texts, it has been treated primarily as a backdrop or setting-as nothing more than a stage on which a human drama is enacted. Conversely, an "earthcentered literary criticism" begins with the assumption that the natural environment is foundational not only to human survival and flourishing, but also to our cultural and individual identities. To study literature without a close attention to issues of place and environment is to behave as if humans exist in a void, when in fact we are defined by our relationship to a rich matrix of physical geography, weather phenomena, plants, and nonhuman beings. Ecocriticism takes seriously that these natural forces have stories of their own, and that our own stories cannot be told well or fully understood without attention to ecology. This paper explores one of Conor McPherson's most famous plays, The Birds (2009), from an ecocritical perspective. The work is a bold adaptation of Daphne du Maurier's short story of the same title, and can be read as a commentary on the woeful circumstances humans encounter if we find ourselves in tension with the natural world. In other words, the play deals with the human condition pushed to its limits, and questions what humans are capable of doing to each other in an "apocalyptic" situation. The present paper attempts to answer the following questions: how is nature represented in The Birds and which ecological terms can be applied? In this paper, I argue that, by undertaking an ecocritical reading of how McPherson represents nonhuman beings within stage directions, it is possible to better understand the ways in which humans' disconnect from the natural world both caused, and affects the outcome of, an apocalyptic situation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.