The courier, express, and parcel (CEP) market in Indonesia is growing rapidly in line with the growth of e-commerce. These developments created intense competition among the CEP companies. SBU expresses PT. As a new CEP company, XYZ seeks to avoid the red ocean competition by innovating the Blue Ocean Strategy. The research method used is qualitative research to study social phenomena by processing data in words sourced from interviews and studies of company documents and articles from outside the company. Based on the blue ocean strategy analysis, PT. XYZ formulates the company's strategy by creating B2C (Business to Customer) and C2C (Customer to Customer), and B2B (Business to Business) business models. The formulation of the blue ocean strategy for CEP services for B2C and C2C, is delivery via 3D printing, eco-friendly packaging, drop off drive-thru, mobile outlets and halal logistics services. Meanwhile, for B2B, is special handling for special goods, halal logistics services, environmentally friendly packaging, on-time delivery, and logistics consulting services.
The method for forming omnibus laws and regulations is relatively new to positive law for the formation of laws and regulations in Indonesia, considering overlapping regulations are one of the legal issues for reforming laws and regulations in Indonesia that need serious attention. There is a great number of laws and regulations that overlap each other, both horizontally and vertically, resulting in disharmony and legal uncertainty in the laws and regulations in Indonesia and to increase investment value and the national economy which is still relatively low when compared to other countries. This research discusses how the omnibus law concept is applied in other countries in the formation of laws and regulations; and whether the concept of the omnibus law implemented by the Government of Indonesia is in accordance with the objectives of the law and the legal reform of the formation of statutory regulations. This study uses normative research methods. The results of this study conclude that first, other countries, namely Canada, the United States, the Philippines and Vietnam have different legal reasoning, namely as a consolidated norm; increase the investment sector; and the many laws and regulations that overlap with each other and the process of forming laws and regulations is lengthy. Second, the omnibus law method in Indonesia is through Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation which has been revoked by Government Regulation in lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022 does not reflect the objectives of the law (fairness, public benefit and legal certainty) and there are no principles for forming good statutory regulations.
In the context of positive law in Indonesia, interfaith marriage is not recognized, because according to Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, it is explained that a valid marriage is based on the laws of each religion and belief. However, this is not enough to accommodate the development of marriage law in Indonesia, such as in the case of Judgement Number 508/Pdt.P/2022/PN JKT.SEL whose gives permission to applicants who are bound by marriage but of different religions to register their marriage at South Jakarta Department Population and Civil Registration Agency. So based on this, this research aims to find out how the concept of universalism and cultural relativism is in the context of interfaith marriage and how is the legalization of interfaith marriage in Indonesia in the context of marriage as one of the non-derogable human rights. This research uses legal research methods. So that the results of this research found that, first, interfaith marriages in Indonesia still do not have clear and firm regulations, giving rise to legal uncertainty and legal vacuum, the principle of universalism is more relevant in the context of interfaith marriages in Indonesia than the cultural relativism concept. Second, the state can issue an Interfaith Marriage Book as a form of legalizing interfaith marriages in Indonesia and providing legal certainty.
The Covid-19 pandemic has been spread throughout the world, which has caused the governments of each country to implement a restriction on human rights, which is freedom of movement. This is a step and a response from the government to overcome the spread of Covid-19, as well as the Indonesian government. As a state of law (rechtstaat), of course the Indonesian government has its own specialty to respond and to enforce a regulation to deal with di Covid-19 pandemic, in accordance with the provisions of the emergency constitutional law and the limitation on human rights. The limitation on freedom of movement throughout the implementation of limitation on human rights that have been implemented by the Indonesian government, if it traced, they are PSBB, Transitional PSBB, Emergency PPKM and 4-Level PPKM. These are all of the responses and steps that have been taken by the government to cope and to overcome the Covid-19 pandemic. However, of course, the implementation is not always in accordance with what is expected, so it is worth questioning the legal effectiveness, whether it is in accordance with the sense of justice as the law is implemented, or not in accordance and far-reached from the sense of justice as one of the objectives of the law.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.