This study aims to examine and analyze the juridical and victimological correlations to the forms and developments of narcotics crime based on several Decisions of the District Court of Makassar during the Covid-19 pandemic. This study uses normative legal research with a statute approach and a case approach. The collected legal material is analyzed using qualitative analysis techniques to describe the problem and answer study purposes. The results show juridical and victimological correlations: Law No. 8 of 1981, Law No. 35 of 2009, and Rehabilitation. The forms and developments of narcotics crime during the Covid-19 pandemic can be identified based on the application of investigator testimony, victims of abusers, rehabilitation, participation, criminal disparity, special minimum punishment, undercover buying, and the best interest principle for children. Therefore, it is recommended that all law enforcement agencies not abuse their authority in implementing the juridical and victimological correlations. In this case, eradicating narcotics crimes in Indonesia can be more effective in the future.
This research aims to assist the police institution in preventing theft crimes that increased during the Covid-19 period by mapping areas prone to theft crimes based on the incident's location and the level of intensity of theft crimes. This research is empirical, managed quantitatively by collecting data through documentation and literature study. The results showed an increase in the number of theft crimes by 42.65% in Makassar City during the six months of the coronavirus pandemic period. This research also succeeded in mapping the locations prone to theft crimes, mostly in residents' homes rather than in the business center, the central area of money circulation. The research results also show that almost all sub-districts in Makassar City are the places where theft crimes occur, dominated by medium and high categories symbolized by red, yellow, and green color. This study recommends that police institutions pay more attention to residential areas, which are the areas where theft crimes most occur during the pandemic period. Furthermore, this research implies that it can become a reference for the police institution to prepare efforts to prevent theft crimes in Makassar City and other areas during the Covid-19 period.
This study examines the extent to which the implementation of the rights and obligations of Public and Private General Hospitals in Makassar City and the obstacles that make these rights and obligations difficult to implement. The research method used in this study is the empirical method. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of the rights and obligations at the Regional General Hospital (Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah/RSUD) of Makassar City and the Mother and Child Hospital (Rumah Sakit Ibu dan Anak/RSIA) Ananda has carried out the rights and obligations of the hospital simultaneously. However, in the implementation of these rights and obligations, there are still several obstacles, such as community habits, administrative completeness that does not meet minimum service standards, and other supporting infrastructure. Especially for Makassar City Hospital, the data for health personnel has not been updated as mandated by the Government Regulation on the Implementation of the Hospital Sector. Meanwhile, RSIA Ananda must improve the facilities and infrastructure of the hospital parking lot so that health services can be more optimal and effective, and efficient to carry out.
This research aims to provide prescriptions on what is the relevance of the Value of Goods toward Criminal Act of Theft and what should be done. This research is a Normative Research, with the approach was Conceptual, Statute and Case approach. Legal material itself was legislation, court rulings, legal journals, theses, and other official legal publications. The data then were analyzed qualitatively. The result of the researcher indicate that the Value of Goods as the causa prima has relevance to criminal act of theft. Misdriff or not, using regular or quick criminal procedure, both depend on the Value of Goods and the specific situation. On the other hand, the accusation of the public prosecutor has an essential role, especially in determining the loss, the specification of evidence, and the application of the Article which has implications for the consideration of judges' decisions. Finally, the high burden of cases and other problems can be prevented by strengthening the existence of misdriff through the adjustment or reconstruction of the Value of Goods until reconstruction of the Criminal Act of Theft.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.