To identify the knowledge gap and misconceptions about osteoarthritis)OA(and its risk factors among the general population of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 11-13 April, 2019. The study was approved by King Abdullah International Medical Research Center. A representative sample of the public in well-known mall was asked to complete the questionnaire to assess their knowledge regarding OA. The questionnaire consisted of 3 parts: 1(demographic data, 2(general knowledge regarding OA, and 3(a quiz of 20 questions. A descriptive Original Article analysis was carried out with t-test and F-test-based method. Results: The study had 1238 respondents. Approximately 55% of them were females, with 51.8% between the ages of 18 to 29. Approximately 62% held a bachelor's degree and 63% had a family member or a friend afflicted with OA. Relatives and friends were the main source of information regarding OA. Only 37% correctly identified the mechanism behind OA. The mean score for the 20-item quiz was 9.84. No significant differences were found when comparing scores of males and females or those of age groups. However, significant differences in scores were identified between respondents of varying educational levels)p<0.001(, participants' knowledge of the mechanism leading to OA)p<0.001(, information sources)p<0.001(, and knowing someone with it)p<0.001(. Conclusion: The results of our study suggest a low level of knowledge regarding OA among Jeddah population. Many misconceptions regarding OA were identified, so more information be brought to the public.

Background Physically active individuals are susceptible to sports injuries, one of which is anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. ACL injury can be managed conservatively or by surgical reconstruction. Returning to sport (RTS) after ACL injury is one of the main goals of ACL reconstruction (ACLR). However, rates of return vary and can be affected by several factors. The objectives of this study were to estimate the rate of return and to identify the factors that might affect RTS after ACLR. Methods This was a cross-sectional study, including individuals who had an ACLR. Participants were sent an online survey included questions about their injury, sport participation, International Knee Documentation Committee form (IKDC), and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). Participants who had their surgery in the period between January 2011 to December 2018 and participated in sports regularly were included. Descriptive statistics were performed. Chisquare and student t-tests were performed to explore the differences between participants who returned and the ones that did not.

No abstract

No abstract

Background and Objective: Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been investigated and shown excellent short- and long-term outcomes. In this paper, we describe a new MIS-TLIF technique and pedicle screw insertion using a marker screw as a guidance method. Moreover, we report perioperative, postoperative, and patient-related outcomes. In addition, this paper outlines major differences in radiation exposure, cost effectiveness and accuracy of Marker Screw Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (MS-MIS TLIF) compared to other techniques. We report our technique to share our knowledge and experience with the aim of achieving a better MIS-TLIF that would help both surgeons and patients. Materials and Methods: A prospective case series was conducted between October 2018 and February 2021. Patients undergoing MS-MIS TLIF with marker screws were consecutively included. The surgery did not exceed two levels. The patients’ medical records were reviewed, and the included patients were asked to complete two outcome-questionnaires before surgery and at the six-month visit. The surgical technique is described in this paper. Results: A total of 37 patients were recruited. The mean age was 57.35 ± 12.8 years, and more than half of the patients were females. The most common indications for surgery were degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis, with the typical level at L4–5. The operative time was 3.02 ± 0.83 h, while the estimated blood loss was 127.7 ± 71.1 mL. The average time for ambulation and hospitalization was 1 ± 1.1 and 2.84 ± 1.4 days, respectively. The patients described significant improvement in both questionnaires. No screw-related complications or screw revisions were needed up to two years of follow-up. Conclusions: The use of marker screws for pedicle screw placement through a minimally invasive fashion is shown to be a promising technique that can overcome many drawbacks, including cost, operative time, and radiation exposure. Performing MS-MIS TLIF can achieve a 360- degree fusion compared to percutaneous MIS-TLIF.

BackgroundIn the management of lumbar spine diseases, various techniques have been described for minimizing intraoperative blood loss. Soft tissue extravasation and hemolysis have been referred to as hidden blood loss (HBL). By acknowledging HBL and accounting for it in our postoperative care, strategies of fluid infusion and blood transfusion may be altered. Our study aims to estimate HBL in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgeries and to analyze associated factors. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. Records of patients who underwent TLIF between January 2016 and December 2020 were reviewed. Patients with both minimally invasive (MIS) and open TLIF were included. Patients with infection, tumors, or fractures being the indication for surgery were excluded. Moreover, patients with known blood-related diseases, aged younger than 18 years, patients requiring blood transfusion, or patients with estimated intra-operative blood loss greater than 1.5 L were excluded. HBL was calculated according to the formulae depending on patients' weight, height, and hematocrit. Statistical analyses were performed to determine associations between HBL and other factors. ResultsA total of 95 patients were included. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 231 mL, whereas the mean HBL was 265 mL, and the mean total blood loss is 629.7 ml with HBL accounting for 42% of it. Significant associated factors with HBL were the type of surgery, patient's total blood volume, preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, and decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit. ConclusionSignificant HBL may occur after TLIF, which was shown to be more than EBL. Although MIS had less EBL, it was associated with more HBL. Patients' preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit, and a decrease in them, have been shown to be associated with HBL. All these factors should be considered for postoperative management of blood loss.

Cranio-cervical connection is a well-established biomechanical concept. However, literature of this connection and its impact on cervical alignment is scarce. Chin incidence (CI) is defined as a complementary to the angle between chin tilt (CHT) and C2 slope (C2S) axes. This study aims to investigate the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment parameters and CI with its derivatives.A retrospective cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary center. CT-neck radiographs of non-orthopedics patients were included. They had no history of spine related symptoms or fractures in cranium or pelvis. Images’ reports were reviewed to exclude those with tumors in the c-spine or anterior triangle of the neck.A total of 80 patients was included with 54% of them were males. The mean of age was 30.96± 6.03. Models of predictability for c2-c7 cobb's angle (CA) and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) using C2S, CHT, and CI were significant and consistent r20.585 (f(df3,76) =35.65, P ≤0.0001, r=0.764), r20.474 (f(df2,77) =32.98, P ≤0.0001, r=-0.550), respectively. In addition, several positive significant correlations were detected in our model in relation to sagittal alignment parameters. Nonetheless, models of predictability for CA and SVA in relation to neck tilt (NT), T1 slope (T1S) and thoracic inlet axis (TIA) were less consistent and had a significant marginally weaker attributable effect on CA, however, no significant effect was found on SVA r20.406 (f(df1,78) =53.39, P ≤0.0001, r=0.620), r20.070 (f(df3,76) =1.904, P 0.19), respectively. Also, this study shows that obesity and aging are linked to decreased CI which will result in increasing SVA and ultimately decreasing CA.CI model has a more valid attributable effect on the sagittal alignment in comparison to TIA model. Future investigations factoring this parameter might enlighten its linkage to many cervical spine diseases or post-op complications (i.e., trismus).

No abstract