This study aims to review the evidence regarding the association between peripheral artery disease (PAD) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as well as influential underlying factors and diagnostic options. Eligible literature was searched in PubMed published up to June 1, 2020, in English. Case studies, case series, reviews, and meta-analyses were excluded. We also excluded non-human studies and those 20 years and older. A total of 44 studies were finally incorporated in the narrative review. The results indicated that compared to controls, RA patients are more prone to PAD. Traditional risk factors, disease-characteristics, vitamin D deficiency, therapy used, and other relevant conditions have a variable effect on overall PAD progression. Studies comparing diagnostic options revealed that vascular function and morphology are connected but are still distinctive processes. In early-stage disease, there are functional alterations in the endothelium that can be controlled by anti-inflammatory medications. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) <0.9 might not be quite susceptible to PAD evaluation. Supplemental diagnostic tools could detect vascular disease in the preclinical stage. Most risk factors are adjustable, and the management will have a good impact on vascular health. PAD is mostly subclinical when the therapeutic options have a better impact. Diagnostic modalities should be chosen depending on the features of RA. In addition, multiple diagnostic options increase the accuracy of PAD diagnosis. Future prospective studies with larger populations at different age groups and different disease activity duration are essential to make firm conclusions and better understand the phenomenon of RA and PAD.

The mainstay of treatment for type 1 diabetes is insulin. The use of insulin for tight glycemic control is the key to preventing micro-and macrovascular complications, but it can also lead to hypoglycemic episodes. Therefore, there is a need for the introduction of a drug that can maintain glucose levels within a safe range without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. For this reason, SGLT2 (sodium-glucose co-transporter-2) inhibitors has been a hot topic in the last couple of years. They have been proved very efficient in treating type 2 diabetes. Many trials on the safety and efficacy of SGLT2 inhibitors have been done on type 1 diabetics. Some other studies have also been done that prove their benefits in increasing arterial efficacy and reducing GFR (glomerular filtration rate). This review article discusses the benefits and risks. The literature search was performed using PubMed, and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 published papers were found. All relevant articles on the topic have been included. Our review has shown that the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors outweigh their risks. Their benefits include good glycemic control, HBA1c (glycated haemoglobin) reduction, weight loss, and blood pressure improvement. Furthermore, improvement in GFR and arterial efficacy is also significant. Side effects such as UTI (urinary tract infection) and genital infection have been observed, but their incidence is low. However, DKA (diabetic ketoacidosis) and hypoglycemia are severe side effects that should be highlighted. Hypoglycemia can be prevented by strictly monitoring blood sugar levels. The patient must be educated and counseled about DKA and its symptoms. This will ensure the safety of the patient as euglycemic DKA can prove fatal if not diagnosed earlier. So, SGLT2 inhibitors can be used as an effective drug to control blood sugar levels in type 1 diabetes, especially in patients with a BMI higher than 30. It will not only achieve the treatment goals but can also decrease the morbidity and mortality of the patients. However, more studies need to be done to fully understand DKA caused by SGLT2 inhibitors.

Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) is the most frequently occurring complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). PEP is associated with significant morbidity and mortality; that is why the prevention of PEP is essential. Pharmacoprevention holds a central position in PEP prophylaxis. The current literature explores the efficacy of various pharmacological agents in preventing PEP, their routes of administration, and the correct administration timing. Data was collected on PubMed using regular keywords, the latter yielded 2077 papers. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 218 papers were selected and screened and 28 studies were finally chosen after the removal of duplicate and irrelevant studies. The selected 28 articles comprised 25 randomized clinical trials and three systematic reviews. The study concludes that rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) administered before ERCP are effective in preventing PEP in high-risk patients. The efficacy of rectal NSAIDs in low to medium risk group is not well established. A combination of rectal NSAIDs and intravenous hydration provides improved prophylaxis against PEP in high-risk patients than NSAIDs alone. Nafamostat, sublingual nitrates, and intravenous hydration are potential alternatives in patients with contraindications to NSAIDs.