In order to plan for the wide-scale introduction of meningococcal C conjugate (MCC) vaccine for United Kingdom children up to 18 years old, phase II trials were undertaken to investigate whether there was any interaction between MCC vaccines conjugated to tetanus toxoid (TT) or a derivative of diphtheria toxin (CRM 197 ) and diphtheria-tetanus vaccines given for boosting at school entry or leaving. Children (n ؍ 1,766) received a diphtheria-tetanus booster either 1 month before, 1 month after, or concurrently with one of three MCC vaccines conjugated to CRM 197 or TT. All of the MCC vaccines induced high antibody responses to the serogroup C polysaccharide that were indicative of protection. The immune response to the MCC-TT vaccine was reduced as a result of prior immunization with a tetanus-containing vaccine, but antibody levels were still well above the lower threshold for protection. Prior or simultaneous administration of a diphtheria-containing vaccine did not affect the response to MCC-CRM 197 vaccines. The immune responses to the carrier proteins were similar to those induced by a comparable dose of diphtheria or tetanus vaccine. The results also demonstrate that, for these conjugate vaccines in these age groups, both standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and those that measure high-avidity antibodies to meningococcal C polysaccharide correlated equally well with assays that measure serum bactericidal antibodies, the established serological correlate of protection for MCC vaccines.In November 1999, the United Kingdom introduced conjugate vaccines against meningococcal serogroup C disease (MCC vaccines) into its immunization schedule for infants, with promising early reports of efficacy (18). The vaccines were also offered to all children between 1 and 17 years of age as a catch-up program that started in November 1999 and was completed within a year. The evidence of safety and immunogenicity of the MCC vaccines in these age groups was obtained from phase II trials conducted in the United Kingdom and sponsored by the Department of Health. Following promising results of early trials using the 2-, 3-, and 4-month schedule in United Kingdom infants (16), the Department of Health sponsored a comprehensive clinical trials program to evaluate the performance of candidate MCC vaccines in toddlers, children starting school, children leaving school, and young adults (12).One concern was the potential for interaction between the MCC vaccines, which contained either tetanus toxoid (TT) or the CRM 197 derivative of diphtheria toxin as the protein carrier, and the diphtheria and tetanus vaccines given as booster doses at school entry (DT) or school leaving (Td). To address these concerns, trials were conducted in which children received MCC vaccine a month before or after, or at the same time as, their DT or Td booster vaccine. Humoral immune responses against DT and MCC antigens were assessed following each vaccination.Since it was anticipated that licensure of the MCC vaccines would be based on immunogenic...
To determine the immune response of premature infants to meningococcal serogroup C capsular polysaccharide (MCC) and combined diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-acellular pertussis-Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP-Hib) conjugate vaccines, 105 infants born at <32 weeks' gestation had Hib IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and MCC serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) geometric mean titers (GMTs) measured 1 month after the third immunization. Term infants served as control subjects. Premature infants had Hib GMCs of 0.27 microg/mL, with 21% achieving GMCs>1.0 microg/mL, compared with 0.81 microg/mL and 46% in term infants (P<.001 and P=.003, respectively). The MCC SBA GMT was 398, with 99% achieving an SBA > or =8, compared with 380 and 98% in term infants (P=.84 and P=1.0, respectively). Hib IgG was associated with age at third immunization (P<.001). When combined with the DTaP vaccine used in this study, the Hib GMC of premature infants was extremely low. The SBA GMT to MCC was similar to that of term infants.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.