At present, the global reliability and accuracy of Precipitable Water Vapor (PWV) from different reanalysis products have not been comprehensively evaluated. In this study, PWV values derived by 268 Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) stations around the world covering the period from 2016 to 2018 are used to evaluate the accuracies of PWV values from five reanalysis products. The temporal and spatial evolution is not taken into account in this analysis, although the temporal and spatial evolution of atmospheric flows is one of the most important information elements available in numerical weather prediction products. The evaluation results present that five reanalysis products with PWV accuracy from high to low are in the order of the fifth generation of European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis (ERA5), ERA-Interim, Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55), National Centers for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR), and NCEP/DOE (Department of Energy) according to root mean square error (RMSE), bias and correlation coefficient. The ERA5 has the smallest RMSE value of 1.84 mm, while NCEP/NCAR and NCEP/DOE have bigger RMSE values of 3.34 mm and 3.51 mm, respectively. The findings demonstrate that ERA5 and two NCEP reanalysis products have the best and worst performance, respectively, among five reanalysis products. The differences in the accuracy of the five reanalysis products are mainly attributed to the differences in the spatial resolution of reanalysis products. There are some large absolute biases greater than 4 mm between GNSS PWV values and the PWV values of five reanalysis products in the southwest of South America and western China due to the limit of terrains and fewer observations. The accuracies of five reanalysis products are compared in different climatic zones. The results indicate that the absolute accuracies of five reanalysis products are highest in the polar regions and lowest in the tropics. Furthermore, the effects of different seasons on the accuracies of five reanalysis products are also analyzed, which indicates that RMSE values of five reanalysis products in summer and in winter are the largest and the smallest in the temperate regions. Evaluation results from five reanalysis products can help us to learn more about the advantages and disadvantages of the five released water vapor products and promote their applications.
In this study, we focus on the kinematic precise point positioning (PPP) solutions at high‐latitudes during the March 2015 great geomagnetic storm. We aim to discover the mechanism behind the positioning degradation from the perspective of the impacts of the storm‐induced ionospheric disturbance on the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) data processing. We observed that the phase scintillation dominated the amplitude scintillation at high‐latitudes and the variation pattern of the rate of total electron content index (ROTI) was consistent with that of the phase scintillation during the storm. The kinematic PPP errors at high‐latitudes were almost three times larger than those at the middle‐ and low‐latitude, which were accompanied by large ROTI variations. From the perspective of GNSS data processing, the large positioning errors were also found to be related to the large number of satellites experiencing cycle slips (CSs). Based on the lock time from the ionospheric scintillation monitoring receiver, we found that a large amount of the CSs was falsely detected under the conventional threshold of the CS detector. By increasing such threshold, the kinematic positioning accuracy at high‐latitudes can be improved to obtain similar magnitude as at middle‐ and low‐latitude. The improved positioning accuracy may suggest that the ionospheric disturbance induced by the geomagnetic storm at high‐latitudes has minor effects on triggering the CSs. Therefore, precise positioning can be achieved at high‐latitudes under geomagnetic storms, given that the CS problem is well addressed.
The Multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System (Multi-GNSS) has become the standard implementation of high accuracy positioning and navigation applications. It is well known that the noise of code and phase measurements depend on GNSS constellation. Then, Helmert variance component estimation (HVCE) is usually used to adjust the contributions of different GNSS constellations by determining their individual variances of unit weight. However, HVCE requires a heavy computation load. In this study, the HVCE posterior weighting was employed to carry out a kinematic relative Multi-GNSS positioning experiment with six short-baselines from day of year (DoY) 171 to 200 in 2019. As a result, the HVCE posterior weighting strategy improved Multi-GNSS positioning accuracy by 20.5%, 15.7% and 13.2% in east-north-up (ENU) components, compared to an elevation-dependent (ED) priori weighting strategy. We observed that the weight proportion of both code and phase observations for each GNSS constellation were consistent during the entire 30 days, which indicates that the weight proportions of both code and phase observations are stable over a long period of time. It was also found that the quality of a phase observation is almost equivalent in each baseline and GNSS constellation, whereas that of a code observation is different. In order to reduce the time consumption of the HVCE method without sacrificing positioning accuracy, the stable variances of unit weights of both phase and code observations obtained over 30 days were averaged and then frozen as a priori information in the positioning experiment. The result demonstrated similar ENU improvements of 20.0%, 14.1% and 11.1% with respect to the ED method but saving 88% of the computation time of the HCVE strategy. Our study concludes with the observations that the frozen variances of unit weight (FVUW) could be applied to the positioning experiment for the next 30 days, that is, from DoY 201 to 230 in 2019, improving the positioning ENU accuracy of the ED method by 18.1%, 13.2% and 10.6%, indicating the effectiveness of the FVUW.
Estimating inter-system biases (ISBs) is important in multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) processing. The present study aims to evaluate and screen out an optimal estimation strategy of ISB for multi-GNSS kinematic precise point positioning (PPP). The candidate strategies considered for ISB estimation are white noise process (ISB-WN), random walk process (ISB-RW), constant (ISB-CT) and eliminated by between-satellite single-differenced observations (ISB-SD). We first present the mathematical model of ISB derived from the observation combination among different GNSSs, and we demonstrate the equivalence between ISB-WN and ISB-SD in the Kalman filter. In order to evaluate the performance of these four ISB solution strategies, we implement kinematic PPP with 1-month static data from 112 International GNSS service stations and two-hour dynamic vehicular data collected in an urban case. For comparison, precise orbit and clock products from the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), GeoForschungsZentrum in Germany (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WHU) are employed in our experiments. The results of static tests show that the positioning accuracy is comparable among the four strategies, but ISB-CT performs slightly better in convergence time. In the kinematic test, there are more cycle slips than static test, and the ISB-CT improves the positioning accuracy by 15.7%, 38.9% and 63.2% in east, north and up components, and reduces the convergence time by 60.1% comparing with the other strategies. Moreover, both the static and kinematic tests prove the consistence among CODE, GFZ and WHU precise products and the equivalence between ISB-WN and ISB-SD strategies. Finally, more, i.e., the same amount of cycle slips as for the dynamic data, are artificially added to the static data to conduct the pseudo-kinematic test. The result shows that ISB-CT improves the positioning accuracy and convergence time by 19.2% and 24.4%, respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.