The last two decades have seen the emergence of significant evidence that has altered certain aspects of the management of acute pancreatitis. While most cases of acute pancreatitis are mild, the challenge remains in managing the severe cases and the complications associated with acute pancreatitis. Gallstones are still the most common cause with epidemiological trends indicating a rising incidence. The surgical management of acute gallstone pancreatitis has evolved. In this article, we revisit and review the methods in diagnosing acute pancreatitis. We present the evidence for the supportive management of the condition, and then discuss the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis. Based on the evidence, our local institutional pathways, and clinical experience, we have produced an outline to guide clinicians in the management of acute gallstone pancreatitis.

Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) represents a major cause of graft loss and mortality after liver transplantation. It occurs in up to 9% of adult recipients. The early diagnosis of HAT decreases septic complications, multiorgan failure, and graft loss, and there are better outcomes after treatment. In this study, we reviewed 102 episodes of HAT, which were classified as early hepatic artery thrombosis (E-HAT) when they were diagnosed within the first 21 days after transplantation. The overall incidence of HAT was 7%: 31 episodes (30.4%) were identified as E-HAT, and 71 episodes (69.6%) were identified as late hepatic artery thrombosis (L-HAT). Graft dysfunction was the commonest presentation (30 cases or 29%). Most E-HAT cases were managed with retransplantation (74%), whereas early revascularization was carried out for only 13% with a 75% success rate. The incidence of retransplantation for L-HAT was only 41%, whereas 32% were too ill for relisting and eventually died. Successful conservative management was noted for 13 of the 102 patients (13%) with collateralization and good hepatic perfusion, with biliary complications encountered in 7 cases (54%) subsequently. A multivariate analysis showed that previous episodes of HAT, the number of arterial anastomoses, and a low donor weight were independent risk factors for E-HAT, whereas a history of upper abdominal operations (non-HAT), a previous history of HAT, a low donor weight, and a recipient age < 50 years were independent risk factors for L-HAT. The graft survival rates for HAT patients were 52%, 36.6%, and 27.4% at 1, 3, and 5 years, whereas the corresponding rates were 81.4%, 81.2%, and 76.4% for non-HAT patients. In conclusion, prompt revascularization for E-HAT patients decreases the incidence of serious, irreversible septic complications and graft loss and improves overall outcomes. A significant number of L-HAT patients do not require further intervention despite the high incidence of ischemic cholangiopathy. Liver transplantation (LT) is the ideal therapy for endstage liver disease. Vascular complications after LT are not uncommon despite the marked improvements and innovations in anastomotic vascular techniques; they frequently result in hepatic insufficiency and graft failure and thus the need for retransplantation.

INTRODUCTION The development of pancreatic infection is associated with the development of a deteriorating disease with subsequent high morbidity and mortality. There is agreement that in mild pancreatitis there is no need to use antibiotics; in severe pancreatitis it would appear to be a logical choice to use antibiotics to prevent secondary pancreatic infection and decrease associated mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS A non-systematic review of current evidence, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials was conducted to assess the role of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis and whether it might improve morbidity and mortality in pancreatitis. RESULTS Mixed evidence was found to support and refute the role of prophylactic antibiotics in acute pancreatitis. Most studies have failed to demonstrate much benefit from its routine use. Data from our unit suggested little benefit of their routine use, and showed that the mortality of those treated with antibiotics was significantly higher compared with those not treated with antibiotics (9% vs 0%, respectively, P = 0.043). In addition, the antibiotic group had significantly higher morbidity (36% vs 5%, respectively, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Antibiotics should be used in patients who develop sepsis, infected necrosis-related systemic inflammatory response syndrome, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome or pancreatic and extra-pancreatic infection. Despite the many other factors that should be considered, prompt antibiotic therapy is recommended once inflammatory markers are raised, to prevent secondary pancreatic infection. Unfortunately, there remain many unanswered questions regarding the indications for antibiotic administration and the patients who benefit from antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the best treatment for end-stage hepatic failure, with an excellent survival rates over the last decade. Biliary complications after LT pose a major challenge especially with the increasing number of procured organs after circulatory death. Ischaemic cholangiopathy (IC) is a set of disorders characterized by multiple diffuse strictures affecting the graft biliary system in the absence of hepatic artery thrombosis or stenosis. It commonly presents with cholestasis and cholangitis resulting in higher readmission rates, longer length of stay, repeated therapeutic interventions, and eventually re-transplantation with consequent effects on the patient's quality of life and increased health care costs. The pathogenesis of IC is unclear and exhibits a higher prevalence with prolonged ischaemia time, donation after circulatory death (DCD), rejection, and cytomegalovirus infection. The majority of IC occurs within 12 mo after LT. Prolonged warm ischaemic times predispose to a profound injury with a subsequently higher prevalence of IC. Biliary complications and IC rates are between 16% and 29% in DCD grafts compared to between 3% and 17% in donation after brain death (DBD) grafts. The majority of ischaemic biliary lesions occur within 30 d in DCD compared to 90 d in DBD grafts following transplantation. However, there are many other risk factors for IC that should be considered. The benefits of DCD in expanding the donor pool are hindered by the higher incidence of IC with increased rates of re-transplantation. Careful donor selection and procurement might help to optimize the utilization of DCD grafts.