Purpose: To compare the complication rates, surgical time and learning curve using the 3-D Heads up display system in comparison with the conventional microscope for routine cataract surgery. Methods: Consecutive consenting adults with uncomplicated cataract were offered phacoemulsification using the 3-D Heads up display system (ARTEVO 800 Carl Zeiss Meditec) or the conventional microscope (Zeiss Lumera 700) by two experienced surgeons. Surgical time, measured from start of corneal incision to removal of microscope from the surgical field and complication rates were compared between the groups. Results: Of the 343 eyes enrolled, 100 (29%) underwent surgery using the 3-D Heads up display system. The surgical time for 3-D Heads up display system was significantly higher in the 3-D group (8.4 ± 2.1 vs. 6.5 ± 1.8 minutes, P < 0.001). There were no group differences in surgical complications (2% in 3-D vs. 2.5% in conventional microscope, P = 0.28). Comparing across 4 quartiles within the 3-D group, the mean surgical time was slightly higher during the 1st quartile (n = 25, 9.1 ± 1.9 minutes) compared to the last quartile (n = 25, 8.2 ± 1.9 minutes) (p = 0.17). Complications in the 3-D group occurred only in the initial 50% of cases. Seven (7%) cases in the 3-D group were converted to conventional binocular microscope of which 3 each were due to difficulty in depth perception and low illumination while one was due to intraoperative pupillary constriction. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification with the 3-D Heads up display system takes longer time but offers excellent visualization, ergonomics and safety compared to conventional microscopes. Experienced surgeons should be able to adapt easily after their first 50 surgeries.
Purpose To compare the surgical workload, complications, and visual outcomes using the three-dimensional visualization system with the conventional microscope in phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Design Prospective, non-randomized, open-label interventional study. Methods All patients underwent phacoemulsification cataract surgery using the three-dimensional visualization system or conventional microscope. Results Of the 203 eyes, 80 underwent surgery with the three-dimensional system while 123 underwent with the conventional microscope. No difference was noted in the total surgical duration, complication rates, and visual outcomes between the two groups. However, capsulorhexis was significantly faster using the conventional microscope while posterior chamber intraocular lens insertion was quicker using the three-dimensional system. In terms of cognitive workload comparison, no difference was seen in the surgeons’ heart rate, oxygen saturation levels, and surgery task load index total workload score and workload score for all six dimensions of the questionnaire, between the three-dimensional system and conventional microscope groups. As compared to baseline, the heart rate increased significantly during all surgical steps and at the end in both groups. When compared to baseline, the oxygen saturation levels were significantly raised during capsulorhexis, irrigation, and aspiration and posterior chamber intraocular lens insertion and at the end of the surgery in the three-dimensional group and during incision and at the end of the surgery in the conventional microscope group. Conclusions The duration of surgery, complications, and visual acuity outcomes remain unaffected while performing phacoemulsification cataract surgeries with the three-dimensional viewing system when compared to the conventional microscopes. Moreover, the surgeons’ cognitive workload too remains unaffected while utilizing this revolutionary three-dimensional surgical technology.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and morphological response of intravitreal ranibizumab biosimilar (Razumab) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (n-AMD) up to 12 weeks. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 20 eyes of n-AMD receiving 4 weekly intravitreal Razumab. Main outcome measures were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraretinal-fluid (IRF), subretinal-fluid (SRF), central-subfield thickness (CSFT), maximum central-retinal thickness (CRT), and dimensions of pigment epithelial detachment (PED) from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 12. Results: Improvement in BCVA was seen at all visits, although not significantly (4 weeks: P = 0.18; 8 weeks: P = 0.4; 12 weeks: P = 0. 06). At 12 weeks, 90% of eyes either maintained or had an improvement in BCVA, with 40% of them showing an improvement of ≥3-lines and only 5% of them losing ≥3-lines of visual acuity. The median PED height and PED width reduced by 20.5 µm ( P = 0.03) and 557.5 µm ( P = 0.14), respectively, along with a mean reduction of 57.26 µmin CSFT ( P < 0.001) and 44.15 µm in CRT ( P = 0.004), respectively, at 12 weeks. On qualitative analysis, resolution of SRF and IRF was observed in 45% and 25% of eyes ‘ at 12 weeks. There were no serious ocular or systemic side effects identified. Conclusion: In real-world scenario, Razumab is an efficacious and economical anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent for optimal management of n-AMD. The therapeutic outcomes demonstrated reasonable stabilization and improvement in visual acuity, favorable anatomical outcomes pertaining to OCT-biomarkers with an acceptable safety profile.
A 13 years old previously operated with 25-G pars plana vitrectomy with double internal limiting membrane peel and juxtapapillary endolaser with SF 6 gas tamponade for optic disc pit-associated maculopathy (ODP-M), presented with recurrence after 9 months of successful primary surgery. Three 25-G sclerotomies were made and Human Amniotic Membrane Graft was tucked into the optic disc pit (ODP), the position of the graft was confirmed with intraoperative ocular coherence tomography. Subretinal fluid rapidly resolved within 48 h and best-corrected visual acuity improved to 0.5 LogMAR after 1 week. During the follow-up period of 12 months, no episodes of recurrence or reduction vision or adverse reactions were noted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.